Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Buddybuild

47
61
+ 1
41
Docker

174.8K
140.5K
+ 1
3.9K
Add tool

Buddybuild vs Docker: What are the differences?

Developers describe Buddybuild as "A continuous integration, continuous deployment and user feedback platform for iOS and Android development teams". Buddybuild ties together continuous integration, continuous delivery and an iterative feedback solution into a single, seamless platform. On the other hand, Docker is detailed as "Enterprise Container Platform for High-Velocity Innovation". The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere.

Buddybuild can be classified as a tool in the "Mobile Continuous Integration" category, while Docker is grouped under "Virtual Machine Platforms & Containers".

Some of the features offered by Buddybuild are:

  • Frictionless Setup: set up a comprehensive CI system for your iOS and Android apps in just minutes.
  • Customizable Workflow: use and extend buddybuild to meet the needs of your mobile development workflow.
  • Test with Confidence: maintain and improve the quality of your code base with automated Unit and UI testing

On the other hand, Docker provides the following key features:

  • Integrated developer tools
  • open, portable images
  • shareable, reusable apps

"Easy setup" is the primary reason why developers consider Buddybuild over the competitors, whereas "Rapid integration and build up" was stated as the key factor in picking Docker.

Docker is an open source tool with 54K GitHub stars and 15.6K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Docker's open source repository on GitHub.

Spotify, Pinterest, and Twitter are some of the popular companies that use Docker, whereas Buddybuild is used by Hilenium, Perch, and Getaway GmbH. Docker has a broader approval, being mentioned in 3527 company stacks & 3449 developers stacks; compared to Buddybuild, which is listed in 18 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.

Decisions about Buddybuild and Docker
Florian Sager
IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH · | 3 upvotes · 456.5K views
Chose
LXDLXD
over
DockerDocker

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Buddybuild
Pros of Docker
  • 12
    Easy setup
  • 8
    Beta testing
  • 8
    Crazy easy
  • 7
    GitHub Integration
  • 3
    Crash reporting
  • 2
    Cause it's just great
  • 1
    Good support team
  • 823
    Rapid integration and build up
  • 692
    Isolation
  • 521
    Open source
  • 505
    Testa­bil­i­ty and re­pro­ducibil­i­ty
  • 460
    Lightweight
  • 218
    Standardization
  • 185
    Scalable
  • 106
    Upgrading / down­grad­ing / ap­pli­ca­tion versions
  • 88
    Security
  • 85
    Private paas environments
  • 34
    Portability
  • 26
    Limit resource usage
  • 17
    Game changer
  • 16
    I love the way docker has changed virtualization
  • 14
    Fast
  • 12
    Concurrency
  • 8
    Docker's Compose tools
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 6
    Fast and Portable
  • 5
    Because its fun
  • 4
    Makes shipping to production very simple
  • 3
    Highly useful
  • 3
    It's dope
  • 2
    Package the environment with the application
  • 2
    Super
  • 2
    Open source and highly configurable
  • 2
    Simplicity, isolation, resource effective
  • 2
    MacOS support FAKE
  • 2
    Its cool
  • 2
    Does a nice job hogging memory
  • 2
    Docker hub for the FTW
  • 2
    HIgh Throughput
  • 2
    Very easy to setup integrate and build
  • 0
    Asdfd

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Buddybuild
Cons of Docker
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 8
      New versions == broken features
    • 6
      Unreliable networking
    • 6
      Documentation not always in sync
    • 4
      Moves quickly
    • 3
      Not Secure

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Buddybuild?

    Buddybuild ties together continuous integration, continuous delivery and an iterative feedback solution into a single, seamless platform.

    What is Docker?

    The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Buddybuild?
    What companies use Docker?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Buddybuild?
    What tools integrate with Docker?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    PythonDockerKubernetes+7
    3
    1161
    PythonDockerKubernetes+14
    12
    2658
    Jul 9 2019 at 7:22PM

    Blue Medora

    DockerPostgreSQLNew Relic+8
    11
    2380
    DockerAmazon EC2Scala+8
    6
    2764
    GitHubDockerReact+17
    41
    37418
    What are some alternatives to Buddybuild and Docker?
    Jenkins
    In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
    fastlane
    fastlane lets you define and run your deployment pipelines for different environments. It helps you unify your app’s release process and automate the whole process. fastlane connects all fastlane tools and third party tools, like CocoaPods.
    Bitrise
    It is a Continous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) Platform as a Service (PaaS) with a main focus on mobile app development (iOS, Android). You can automate the testing and deployment of your apps with just a few clicks. When you trigger a build a Virtual Machine is assigned to host your build and your defined Workflow (series of Steps scripts) will be executed, step by step.
    CircleCI
    Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.
    Nevercode
    It is a cloud-based continuous integration & delivery platform for iOS, Android, Cordova, Ionic and React Native. It helps you to release defect-free mobile apps and to save countless hours of manual work every week.
    See all alternatives