StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Continuous Deployment
  5. Buildkite vs DeployBot

Buildkite vs DeployBot

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

DeployBot
DeployBot
Stacks90
Followers92
Votes74
Buildkite
Buildkite
Stacks210
Followers231
Votes115

Buildkite vs DeployBot: What are the differences?

1. **Integration Options**: Buildkite offers native integrations with popular tools like GitHub, Slack, and Docker, allowing for seamless automation and collaboration. DeployBot, on the other hand, provides integration with various cloud platforms like AWS, Azure, and DigitalOcean for smooth deployment workflows. 2. **Pipeline Configuration**: Buildkite allows users to configure pipelines using a YAML file, providing flexibility and control over the build process. DeployBot utilizes a visual interface for creating deployment workflows, simplifying the setup for users without extensive technical knowledge. 3. **Cost Structure**: Buildkite operates on a per-user pricing model, making it cost-effective for smaller teams with limited members. In contrast, DeployBot's pricing is based on the number of deployment targets, making it suitable for organizations with multiple projects and environments. 4. **Support and Documentation**: Buildkite offers extensive documentation and responsive support options, ensuring users have access to resources for troubleshooting and guidance. DeployBot provides personalized support and onboarding assistance, catering to users who may require more hands-on help with the platform. 5. **Deployment Flexibility**: Buildkite focuses primarily on continuous integration and delivery processes, offering a high degree of customization for build pipelines. DeployBot emphasizes deployment automation and rollback features, streamlining the deployment process for applications in various environments. 6. **Security Features**: Buildkite prioritizes security through customizable permissions and audit logs, allowing teams to control access to sensitive information and track changes within the platform. DeployBot emphasizes secure connections and deployment strategies, ensuring data integrity during the deployment process.

In Summary, Buildkite and DeployBot offer distinct features such as integration options, pipeline configuration methods, cost structures, support resources, deployment flexibility, and security measures, catering to the specific needs of users based on their requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

DeployBot
DeployBot
Buildkite
Buildkite

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Manually deploy with a click in the app, automatically deploy on each push, or use deploy tags in a commit [deploy:production].;DeployBot gathers new and changed files from your repositories since the last deployment. You can even preview the changes first.;Files are uploaded, SSH commands are executed and deployment hooks are triggered. Everything is logged for you.;Your entire team can view release notes and optionally receive an email notification with details about the deployment status.;Environments overview;Deployments timeline;Deployment details: tickets, revisions & files
Fast and stable builds; Open source agent runs on almost any machine and architecture; Freedom to use your own internal or pre-release tools and services; Powerful distributed build tools; Key/value targeting of agents; Dynamic job allocation allows adding and removing build machines; Shared key/value and binary artifact stores for easily distributing build jobs regardless of machine or network; Integration with pull requests, deployments and releases; GitHub, Github Enterprise, Bitbucket, Gitlab or your own SCM; Slack, Hipchat, Webhooks, and LIFX notifications; Extensible per-project with agent hooks, webhooks and the rest API; GitHub Enterprise is supported standard; SSO
Statistics
Stacks
90
Stacks
210
Followers
92
Followers
231
Votes
74
Votes
115
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 26
    Easy setup
  • 20
    Seamless integrations
  • 17
    Free
  • 10
    Rocks
  • 1
    Docker
Cons
  • 1
    Not reliable
Pros
  • 18
    Great customer support
  • 17
    Github integration
  • 16
    Easy to use
  • 16
    Easy setup
  • 12
    Simplicity
Integrations
Slack
Slack
HipChat
HipChat
New Relic
New Relic
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Slack
Slack
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
GitLab
GitLab
Heroku
Heroku
HipChat
HipChat
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Git
Git
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
TestFlight
TestFlight

What are some alternatives to DeployBot, Buildkite?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Buddy

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana