StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. CDN
  4. CDN
  5. CarrierWave vs CloudFlare

CarrierWave vs CloudFlare

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CloudFlare
CloudFlare
Stacks77.2K
Followers23.1K
Votes1.8K
CarrierWave
CarrierWave
Stacks160
Followers93
Votes3
GitHub Stars8.8K
Forks1.7K

CarrierWave vs CloudFlare: What are the differences?

Key Differences between CarrierWave and CloudFlare

  1. Functionality: CarrierWave is a Ruby gem that provides a simple and flexible way to upload files in Ruby applications, offering features like image processing and storage backends. In contrast, CloudFlare is a content delivery network that focuses on optimizing website performance, improving security, and providing DDoS protection.

  2. Primary Use Case: CarrierWave is typically used for managing file uploads and storage within a Ruby on Rails application, allowing users to upload images, documents, and other files. On the other hand, CloudFlare is used as a CDN and security solution to cache website content, reduce latency, block malicious traffic, and enhance website security.

  3. Deployment: CarrierWave is integrated into Ruby on Rails applications as a library, making it easy to use for developers working on Rails projects. Conversely, CloudFlare is a separate service that requires website owners to configure their domain's DNS settings to route traffic through CloudFlare's network for optimization and security features.

  4. Cost Structure: CarrierWave is an open-source Ruby gem that is free to use and can be easily integrated into projects without additional costs. In contrast, CloudFlare offers both free and paid plans based on the level of service required, with additional features and support available in higher-tier plans.

  5. Performance Optimization: CarrierWave focuses on file uploads and storage management within the application, providing tools for image resizing, storage backends, and file processing. In contrast, CloudFlare's primary focus is on improving website performance through content caching, network optimization, and security features like DDoS protection and Web Application Firewall (WAF) capabilities.

  6. Data Center Network: CarrierWave does not have its own data center network but relies on the storage backend chosen by the developer, such as Amazon S3 or local storage. On the other hand, CloudFlare operates a global network of data centers that cache website content and deliver it to users from the nearest server location for faster loading times.

In Summary, CarrierWave is a Ruby gem for file uploads in Rails applications, while CloudFlare is a CDN and security solution for optimizing website performance and enhancing security.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CloudFlare
CloudFlare
CarrierWave
CarrierWave

Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet.

This gem provides a simple and extremely flexible way to upload files from Ruby applications. It works well with Rack based web applications, such as Ruby on Rails.

CDN;WAF (Web Application Firewall);DDOS Protection;
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
77.2K
Stacks
160
Followers
23.1K
Followers
93
Votes
1.8K
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 426
    Easy setup, great cdn
  • 278
    Free ssl
  • 200
    Easy setup
  • 191
    Security
  • 181
    Ssl
Cons
  • 2
    Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits
  • 2
    No support for SSHFP records
Pros
  • 2
    Sophisticated and Easy file uploading
  • 1
    Easty setup
Integrations
CodeGuard
CodeGuard
Google Analytics
Google Analytics
GoSquared
GoSquared
Clicky
Clicky
UserVoice
UserVoice
SnapEngage
SnapEngage
Blitz
Blitz
Pingdom
Pingdom
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Rackspace Cloud Files
Rackspace Cloud Files
Rails
Rails
Sinatra
Sinatra
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to CloudFlare, CarrierWave?

Amazon CloudFront

Amazon CloudFront

Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance.

KeyCDN

KeyCDN

KeyCDN offers super fast and secure content delivery for minimal loading time. In addition to the CDN, it also offers advanced image processing and many other features such as live logs and Let's Encrypt SSL.

Fastly

Fastly

Fastly's real-time content delivery network gives you total control over your content, unprecedented access to performance analytics, and the ability to instantly update content in 150 milliseconds.

MaxCDN

MaxCDN

The MaxCDN Content Delivery Network efficiently delivers your site’s static file through hundreds of servers instead of slogging through a single host. This "smart route" technology distributes your content to your visitors via the city closest to them.

jsDelivr

jsDelivr

jsDelivr is a free CDN for open source developers, with advanced features for javascript projects with access to NPM and Github It uses multiple CDN providers, resulting in the best possible uptime and performance.

Uploadcare

Uploadcare

Uploadcare is file management platform and a CDN for user-generated content. It is a robust file API for uploading, managing, processing, rendering, optimizing, and delivering users’ content.

Transloadit

Transloadit

Transloadit handles file uploading & file processing for your websites and mobile apps. We can process video, audio, images and documents.

Moovweb XDN

Moovweb XDN

All-in-one platform to develop, deploy, preview, experiment on, monitor, and run your frontend.

Bytescale

Bytescale

Bytescale is the best way to serve images, videos, and audio for web apps. Includes: Fast CDN, Storage, and Media Processing APIs.

Limelight CDN

Limelight CDN

Whether it’s your website, mobile applications, videos, music, software, games, or APIs, your content needs to reach customers quickly, reliably, and securely. It provides the capacity, coverage, and performance to cost-effectively deliver a better experience for you and your customers.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase