Checkmarx vs WhiteSource

Overview

WhiteSource

Stacks25

Followers67

Votes0

Checkmarx

Stacks84

Followers135

Votes0

Checkmarx vs WhiteSource: What are the differences?

This is a comparison between Checkmarx and WhiteSource. Both tools are commonly used for security testing and code analysis in software development.

Deployment: Checkmarx requires an on-premise deployment, while WhiteSource can be deployed both on-premise and in the cloud. This difference allows for more flexibility in choosing the deployment option that best suits the organization's needs.
Scalability: Checkmarx is known for its scalability, being able to accommodate large enterprise environments with thousands of applications. WhiteSource, on the other hand, is better suited for smaller to medium-sized organizations with fewer applications to manage.
Supported languages: Checkmarx supports a wide range of programming languages, including but not limited to Java, C/C++, .NET, and JavaScript. WhiteSource, although it also supports various languages, does not have the same extensive language coverage as Checkmarx.
Integration: Checkmarx provides integrations with popular development tools like IDEs (Integrated Development Environments) and CI/CD (Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment) systems, allowing for seamless integration into the development workflow. WhiteSource, while also offering similar integrations, may have limitations in terms of the number of integrations available.
Vulnerability detection: Checkmarx focuses on identifying security vulnerabilities in the source code, providing detailed and actionable vulnerability reports. WhiteSource, on the other hand, not only identifies security vulnerabilities but also tracks open-source components for known security vulnerabilities, providing a more holistic approach to vulnerability management.
Pricing model: Checkmarx typically follows a licensing-based pricing model, where the cost is based on factors like the number of applications and users. WhiteSource takes a slightly different approach and follows a usage-based pricing model, where the cost is determined by the number of scans performed or the number of lines of code analyzed.

In summary, Checkmarx offers on-premise deployment, scalability for large enterprise environments, extensive language support, seamless integration, detailed vulnerability detection, and a licensing-based pricing model. WhiteSource, on the other hand, provides both on-premise and cloud deployment options, better suited for smaller to medium-sized organizations, supports various languages, has integration capabilities, offers holistic vulnerability management, and follows a usage-based pricing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on WhiteSource, Checkmarx

Bryan

SRE Manager at Subsplash

Apr 1, 2020

Needs adviceon

WhiteSource

Snyk

Sonatype Nexus

I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.

461k views461k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

WhiteSource	Checkmarx
The leading solution for agile open source security and license compliance management, WhiteSource integrates with the DevOps pipeline to detect vulnerable open source libraries in real-time.	It is a provider of state-of-the-art application security solution: static code analysis software, seamlessly integrated into development process.
Open source components identification; Open source security management; Open source licensees management Open source policies enforcement; Due diligence report;	Evaluate Your Exposure with a Holistic Platform; Gain Full Visibility; Secure Your Entire SDLC; Empower Your Developers; Determine Your Acceptable Risk
Statistics
Stacks 25	Stacks 84
Followers 67	Followers 135
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Apache Ant Docker AWS CodeBuild Apache Maven PHP Google Cloud Build .NET Core CocoaPods npm TeamCity	Jenkins Gradle Bitbucket Travis CI TeamCity Bamboo

What are some alternatives to WhiteSource, Checkmarx?

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Snyk

Automatically find & fix vulnerabilities in your code, containers, Kubernetes, and Terraform

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

FOSSA

Stop vulnerabilities, automate compliance, and mitigate third-party risk in your applications

Related Comparisons

Checkmarx vs WhiteSource: What are the differences?

This is a comparison between Checkmarx and WhiteSource. Both tools are commonly used for security testing and code analysis in software development.

Deployment: Checkmarx requires an on-premise deployment, while WhiteSource can be deployed both on-premise and in the cloud. This difference allows for more flexibility in choosing the deployment option that best suits the organization's needs.
Scalability: Checkmarx is known for its scalability, being able to accommodate large enterprise environments with thousands of applications. WhiteSource, on the other hand, is better suited for smaller to medium-sized organizations with fewer applications to manage.
Supported languages: Checkmarx supports a wide range of programming languages, including but not limited to Java, C/C++, .NET, and JavaScript. WhiteSource, although it also supports various languages, does not have the same extensive language coverage as Checkmarx.
Integration: Checkmarx provides integrations with popular development tools like IDEs (Integrated Development Environments) and CI/CD (Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment) systems, allowing for seamless integration into the development workflow. WhiteSource, while also offering similar integrations, may have limitations in terms of the number of integrations available.
Vulnerability detection: Checkmarx focuses on identifying security vulnerabilities in the source code, providing detailed and actionable vulnerability reports. WhiteSource, on the other hand, not only identifies security vulnerabilities but also tracks open-source components for known security vulnerabilities, providing a more holistic approach to vulnerability management.
Pricing model: Checkmarx typically follows a licensing-based pricing model, where the cost is based on factors like the number of applications and users. WhiteSource takes a slightly different approach and follows a usage-based pricing model, where the cost is determined by the number of scans performed or the number of lines of code analyzed.

Checkmarx vs WhiteSource

Overview