StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Citus vs Hadoop

Citus vs Hadoop

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hadoop
Hadoop
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.3K
Votes56
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks9.1K
Citus
Citus
Stacks60
Followers124
Votes11
GitHub Stars12.0K
Forks736

Citus vs Hadoop: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of big data processing, Citus and Hadoop are two popular solutions that offer distributed computing capabilities for handling large volumes of data. However, there are key differences between these two technologies. In this article, we will explore and compare those differences.

  1. Architecture: The fundamental difference lies in their architecture design. Hadoop follows the distributed file system (HDFS) model, where data is stored in a distributed manner across multiple nodes, and processing is performed by MapReduce jobs. On the other hand, Citus is an extension to the Postgres database that distributes and parallelizes data across multiple nodes, enabling distributed query processing.

  2. Data Processing Paradigm: While Hadoop is primarily designed for batch processing of data, Citus provides real-time performance by leveraging the massively parallel processing (MPP) capabilities of Postgres. Citus allows for concurrent reads and writes, making it suitable for online transaction processing (OLTP) workloads.

  3. Query Language Support: Hadoop uses its own query language called HiveQL, which is based on SQL but has some variations. In contrast, Citus leverages the full power of SQL as it is built as an extension to Postgres. This allows users to leverage their existing SQL skills and tools while working with Citus.

  4. Data Storage: Hadoop utilizes a distributed file system where data is stored across multiple nodes. Data is typically stored in a schemaless format, such as Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) or Apache Parquet. In Citus, data is stored in a traditional relational database format, following the table-based structure of Postgres.

  5. Ease of Deployment and Administration: Hadoop clusters require complex setup and configuration, involving various components like HDFS, YARN, and MapReduce. Additionally, Hadoop clusters often involve managing multiple specialized machines. In contrast, Citus can be easily deployed as an extension to an existing Postgres database, reducing the need for separate cluster management and simplifying administration.

  6. Maturity and Ecosystem: Hadoop has been around for a longer time and has a more mature ecosystem with a wide range of tools and technologies built around it, such as Hive, Pig, and Spark. Citus, being an extension to Postgres, benefits from the extensive ecosystem and tooling that exists for Postgres, including various SQL extensions, connectors, and integration options.

In summary, Citus and Hadoop differ in their architecture, data processing paradigms, query language support, data storage models, ease of deployment, administration, and the maturity of their ecosystems. These differences allow organizations to choose the right technology based on their specific requirements and use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Hadoop, Citus

Mr
Mr

SVP CTO

Apr 22, 2021

Needs adviceonMarkLogicMarkLogicHadoopHadoopSnowflakeSnowflake

For a property and casualty insurance company, we currently use MarkLogic and Hadoop for our raw data lake. Trying to figure out how snowflake fits in the picture. Does anybody have some good suggestions/best practices for when to use and what data to store in Mark logic versus Snowflake versus a hadoop or all three of these platforms redundant with one another?

136k views136k
Comments
Mr
Mr

SVP CTO

Apr 22, 2021

Needs advice

for property and casualty insurance company we current Use marklogic and Hadoop for our raw data lake. Trying to figure out how snowflake fits in the picture. Does anybody have some good suggestions/best practices for when to use and what data to store in Mark logic versus snowflake versus a hadoop or all three of these platforms redundant with one another?

23.6k views23.6k
Comments
Masked
Masked

Jun 29, 2021

Needs advice

There'd be a couple of thousands of customers with a similar data structure and a medium number of transactions per day, but the data volume is pretty high (Each customer has around 1 or 2 GB so it would sum up to roughly 2TB). The usage pattern is both read and write-heavy (writes are mostly made through a Windows app, but read operations are made by the user), and I need the historical data for analysis and aggregation. The data model is not join-heavy as is not join-free. If the solution is fully ACID, the better, but must be Highly Available and Horizontally Scalable.

Also, the budget is not so high, and I'd rather be using a handful (at most 5) of cheap to medium-sized servers (2 CPU cores and 4GB RAM).

7.65k views7.65k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Hadoop
Hadoop
Citus
Citus

The Apache Hadoop software library is a framework that allows for the distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers using simple programming models. It is designed to scale up from single servers to thousands of machines, each offering local computation and storage.

It's an extension to Postgres that distributes data and queries in a cluster of multiple machines. Its query engine parallelizes incoming SQL queries across these servers to enable human real-time (less than a second) responses on large datasets.

-
Multi-Node Scalable PostgreSQL;Built-in Replication and High Availability;Real-time Reads/Writes On Multiple Nodes;Multi-core Parallel Processing of Queries;Tenant isolation
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
12.0K
GitHub Forks
9.1K
GitHub Forks
736
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
60
Followers
2.3K
Followers
124
Votes
56
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 39
    Great ecosystem
  • 11
    One stack to rule them all
  • 4
    Great load balancer
  • 1
    Java syntax
  • 1
    Amazon aws
Pros
  • 6
    Multi-core Parallel Processing
  • 3
    Drop-in PostgreSQL replacement
  • 2
    Distributed with Auto-Sharding
Integrations
No integrations available
.NET
.NET
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Loggly
Loggly
Java
Java
Rails
Rails
Datadog
Datadog
Logentries
Logentries
Heroku
Heroku
Papertrail
Papertrail
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL

What are some alternatives to Hadoop, Citus?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase