StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Cloud Foundry vs Google App Engine

Cloud Foundry vs Google App Engine

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Stacks10.5K
Followers8.1K
Votes611
Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry
Stacks188
Followers346
Votes5

Cloud Foundry vs Google App Engine: What are the differences?

  1. Deployment Flexibility: Cloud Foundry allows users to run their applications on any cloud infrastructure, whereas Google App Engine restricts users to run their applications only on Google's infrastructure.

  2. Programming Language Support: Cloud Foundry supports a wide range of programming languages, enabling developers to use their preferred language, while Google App Engine has limited support for languages such as Java, Python, Go, and PHP.

  3. Container Management: Cloud Foundry uses containers to isolate applications, providing more control over the environment, while Google App Engine abstracts the container management, making it simpler for developers but limiting customization options.

  4. Pricing Model: Cloud Foundry typically follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, allowing users to pay only for the resources they use, while Google App Engine offers a free tier for low-resource usage and a pricing model based on resources consumed.

  5. Service Integrations: Cloud Foundry provides integrations with various third-party services and databases, giving users more options for extending their applications, whereas Google App Engine offers a more streamlined integration with Google Cloud Platform services.

  6. Scaling Options: Cloud Foundry offers more fine-grained control over scaling options, allowing users to scale individual components of an application independently, while Google App Engine focuses on automatic scaling based on incoming traffic.

In Summary, Cloud Foundry provides more deployment flexibility, extensive language support, customizable container management, dynamic pricing, diverse service integrations, and advanced scaling options compared to Google App Engine.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.

Zero to sixty: Scale your app automatically without worrying about managing machines.;Supercharged APIs: Supercharge your app with services such as Task Queue, XMPP, and Cloud SQL, all powered by the same infrastructure that powers the Google services you use every day.;You're in control: Manage your application with a simple, web-based dashboard allowing you to customize your app's performance.
Application and services centric lifecycle API;High performance dynamic routing;Buildpack support;Data and web services brokers;Linux Container management;Role Based Access and Teams;Active application health management;Standards based user authentication and authorization;Integrated real time logging API;Multi-provider ecosystem
Statistics
Stacks
10.5K
Stacks
188
Followers
8.1K
Followers
346
Votes
611
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 145
    Easy to deploy
  • 106
    Auto scaling
  • 80
    Good free plan
  • 62
    Easy management
  • 56
    Scalability
Pros
  • 2
    Perfectly aligned with springboot
  • 1
    Application health management
  • 1
    Free service discovery (Eureka)
  • 1
    Free distributed tracing (zipkin)
Integrations
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Twilio
Twilio
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Logentries
Logentries
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
OpenStack
OpenStack
Papertrail
Papertrail
Amazon VPC
Amazon VPC
Splunk Cloud
Splunk Cloud
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic

What are some alternatives to Google App Engine, Cloud Foundry?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase