Cloud Foundry vs OpenStack

Overview

OpenStack

Stacks790

Followers1.2K

Votes138

Cloud Foundry

Stacks188

Followers346

Votes5

Cloud Foundry vs OpenStack: What are the differences?

Introduction

Cloud Foundry and OpenStack are two widely used open-source cloud computing platforms. While both platforms offer cloud infrastructure and services, there are several key differences between them.

Architecture: Cloud Foundry is a Platform as a Service (PaaS) that provides a fully managed application runtime environment. It abstracts the underlying infrastructure and automates the deployment and scaling of applications. On the other hand, OpenStack is Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) software that offers a suite of components for managing and controlling cloud infrastructure resources like compute, storage, and networking.
Focus: Cloud Foundry primarily focuses on simplifying application development and deployment. It provides developers with a higher level of abstraction, allowing them to focus on writing code rather than managing infrastructure. OpenStack, on the other hand, emphasizes the management and orchestration of infrastructure resources.
Multi-Tenancy: Cloud Foundry natively supports multi-tenancy, allowing multiple users or organizations to operate within a shared environment while keeping their applications and data isolated. OpenStack also provides multi-tenancy through the concept of projects and tenants, allowing different users to have their own virtual resources within the same infrastructure.
Deployment Models: Cloud Foundry typically runs on public or private cloud infrastructure, providing a ready-to-use application platform. OpenStack, on the other hand, offers more flexibility in terms of deployment models. It can be used to build private clouds, public clouds, hybrid clouds, or even edge computing environments.
Abstraction Level: Cloud Foundry abstracts away the infrastructure and provides a higher level of abstraction to developers, allowing them to focus on application development and deployment. OpenStack, while providing infrastructure abstraction, still requires users to have a good understanding of the underlying compute, storage, and networking components.
Community Support: Both Cloud Foundry and OpenStack have active and thriving open-source communities. However, Cloud Foundry has a more focused community of application developers and operators, while OpenStack has a broader community that includes infrastructure engineers, operators, and developers working on various aspects of cloud infrastructure.

In summary, Cloud Foundry and OpenStack differ in their architecture, focus, multi-tenancy support, deployment models, abstraction level, and the nature of their respective open-source communities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenStack	Cloud Foundry
OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.	Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.
Compute;Storage;Networking;Dashboard;Shared Services	Application and services centric lifecycle API;High performance dynamic routing;Buildpack support;Data and web services brokers;Linux Container management;Role Based Access and Teams;Active application health management;Standards based user authentication and authorization;Integrated real time logging API;Multi-provider ecosystem
Statistics
Stacks 790	Stacks 188
Followers 1.2K	Followers 346
Votes 138	Votes 5
Pros & Cons
Pros 60 Private cloud 39 Avoid vendor lock-in 23 Flexible in use 7 Industry leader 5 Robust architecture	Pros 2 Perfectly aligned with springboot 1 Free distributed tracing (zipkin) 1 Free service discovery (Eureka) 1 Application health management
Integrations
No integrations available	VMware vSphere Logentries Amazon EC2 Papertrail Amazon VPC Splunk Cloud Sumo Logic

What are some alternatives to OpenStack, Cloud Foundry?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Apache CloudStack

CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Cloud Foundry vs OpenStack: What are the differences?

Introduction

Cloud Foundry and OpenStack are two widely used open-source cloud computing platforms. While both platforms offer cloud infrastructure and services, there are several key differences between them.

Architecture: Cloud Foundry is a Platform as a Service (PaaS) that provides a fully managed application runtime environment. It abstracts the underlying infrastructure and automates the deployment and scaling of applications. On the other hand, OpenStack is Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) software that offers a suite of components for managing and controlling cloud infrastructure resources like compute, storage, and networking.
Focus: Cloud Foundry primarily focuses on simplifying application development and deployment. It provides developers with a higher level of abstraction, allowing them to focus on writing code rather than managing infrastructure. OpenStack, on the other hand, emphasizes the management and orchestration of infrastructure resources.
Multi-Tenancy: Cloud Foundry natively supports multi-tenancy, allowing multiple users or organizations to operate within a shared environment while keeping their applications and data isolated. OpenStack also provides multi-tenancy through the concept of projects and tenants, allowing different users to have their own virtual resources within the same infrastructure.
Deployment Models: Cloud Foundry typically runs on public or private cloud infrastructure, providing a ready-to-use application platform. OpenStack, on the other hand, offers more flexibility in terms of deployment models. It can be used to build private clouds, public clouds, hybrid clouds, or even edge computing environments.
Abstraction Level: Cloud Foundry abstracts away the infrastructure and provides a higher level of abstraction to developers, allowing them to focus on application development and deployment. OpenStack, while providing infrastructure abstraction, still requires users to have a good understanding of the underlying compute, storage, and networking components.
Community Support: Both Cloud Foundry and OpenStack have active and thriving open-source communities. However, Cloud Foundry has a more focused community of application developers and operators, while OpenStack has a broader community that includes infrastructure engineers, operators, and developers working on various aspects of cloud infrastructure.

In summary, Cloud Foundry and OpenStack differ in their architecture, focus, multi-tenancy support, deployment models, abstraction level, and the nature of their respective open-source communities.