StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. CloudBees vs Rafay Systems

CloudBees vs Rafay Systems

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CloudBees
CloudBees
Stacks108
Followers164
Votes6
Rafay Systems
Rafay Systems
Stacks9
Followers21
Votes0

CloudBees vs Rafay Systems: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of CI/CD and DevOps, choosing the right platform is crucial for optimizing productivity and efficiency. CloudBees and Rafay Systems are two popular choices, each offering unique features to cater to the needs of developers and organizations.

  1. Managed Services vs. Kubernetes Platform: CloudBees focuses on providing managed services for Jenkins automation and other CI/CD tools, offering a comprehensive solution for DevOps teams. On the other hand, Rafay Systems is a Kubernetes platform that emphasizes container management, scalability, and automation for cloud-native applications.

  2. Focus on Jenkins vs. Focus on Kubernetes: CloudBees is known for its deep integration with Jenkins, enhancing its capabilities and providing advanced features for continuous integration and delivery workflows. Meanwhile, Rafay Systems places a strong emphasis on Kubernetes, offering tools and services specifically designed to optimize Kubernetes clusters and workloads.

  3. Enterprise-Grade Features vs. Scalability and Efficiency: CloudBees is renowned for its enterprise-grade features, such as high availability, security, and compliance, making it a suitable choice for large organizations with complex development environments. In contrast, Rafay Systems is praised for its scalability and efficiency in managing Kubernetes resources, allowing users to easily scale their applications as needed.

  4. Integration with Third-Party Tools vs. Ecosystem Compatibility: CloudBees offers seamless integration with a wide range of third-party tools, plugins, and services, allowing users to customize their CI/CD pipelines to meet specific requirements. Rafay Systems, on the other hand, focuses on compatibility with the Kubernetes ecosystem, ensuring that users can leverage the full capabilities of Kubernetes for their containerized applications.

  5. Cost and Pricing Models: CloudBees follows a subscription-based pricing model, offering different tiers with varying features and support levels. In comparison, Rafay Systems provides a flexible consumption-based pricing model, allowing users to pay for the resources and services they actually use, which can be beneficial for organizations looking to control costs.

  6. Support and Community Engagement: CloudBees has a strong community of users and contributors, providing support through forums, documentation, and training resources. Rafay Systems also offers support and documentation for its platform, focusing on assisting users in optimizing their Kubernetes environments for maximum efficiency and performance.

In Summary, CloudBees and Rafay Systems offer distinct approaches to CI/CD and Kubernetes management, catering to different needs and preferences in the realm of DevOps and cloud-native development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CloudBees
CloudBees
Rafay Systems
Rafay Systems

Enables organizations to build, test and deploy applications to production, utilizing continuous delivery practices. They are focused solely on Jenkins as a tool for continuous delivery both on-premises and in the cloud.

Rafay's automation framework provides multi-cluster management and app operations at scale. Create, deploy, operate, monitor, upgrade and retire Kubernetes clusters & k8s-resident applications across multi-regions, clouds and environments.

Hosted CI/CD as a Service; Flexible and governed software delivery automation; Starter Kit; Jenkins Product Support
CI/CD integration; Multi-Cloud abstractions; Customizable, In-cluster scaling; Cross-cluster deployment & scaling; Global traffic steering and API management; Dynamic workload placement; App log & metric aggregation; Operational debugging and diagnostics; Data & State synchronization; Config synchronization; Canary / Rolling upgrades; App health tracking
Statistics
Stacks
108
Stacks
9
Followers
164
Followers
21
Votes
6
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Jenkins
No community feedback yet
Integrations
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Jenkins X
Jenkins X
Codeship
Codeship
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Jenkins
Jenkins
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Docker
Docker
Gmail
Gmail
Datadog
Datadog
Slack
Slack
Amazon EKS
Amazon EKS
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Azure Cosmos DB
Azure Cosmos DB
OpenStack
OpenStack
Vault
Vault
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Kubernetes
Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to CloudBees, Rafay Systems?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase