StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Codefresh vs TeamCity

Codefresh vs TeamCity

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TeamCity
TeamCity
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.1K
Votes316
Codefresh
Codefresh
Stacks64
Followers111
Votes47

Codefresh vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

## Introduction

Codefresh and TeamCity are two popular CI/CD tools that aid in the automation of software development processes. Both platforms offer unique features and capabilities, but key differences exist between them.

1. **Containerization Support**: Codefresh is specifically designed for containerized apps and offers seamless integration with Docker for container setup and management. On the other hand, while TeamCity supports Docker, it is not solely focused on containerization and may require additional configurations for complex container workflows.

2. **Native Kubernetes Integration**: Codefresh provides native integration with Kubernetes, allowing for simplified deployment and orchestration of applications on Kubernetes clusters. In contrast, TeamCity may require third-party plugins or additional setup to achieve similar Kubernetes integration.

3. **CI/CD Pipeline Visualization**: Codefresh offers a visually intuitive interface for designing and monitoring CI/CD pipelines, making it easier for users to track the progress of their workflows. TeamCity, on the other hand, may lack the same level of visual pipeline representation, requiring users to rely more on text-based configurations.

4. **Cloud Platform Support**: Codefresh is a cloud-native CI/CD platform, offering seamless integration with major cloud providers like AWS, GCP, and Azure for deployment and scaling of applications. While TeamCity can also deploy applications to the cloud, it may not provide the same level of out-of-the-box cloud platform support as Codefresh.

5. **Built-in GitOps Capabilities**: Codefresh includes built-in GitOps capabilities, enabling version-controlled CI/CD workflows directly from Git repositories. TeamCity may require additional setup or plugins to achieve similar GitOps functionality, potentially adding complexity to the development process.

6. **Pricing Model**: Codefresh offers a flexible and transparent pricing model based on usage, while TeamCity follows a traditional licensing model with fixed costs based on the number of users or agents, which may impact the scalability and cost-effectiveness of the tool for larger teams or projects.

## In Summary, 
Codefresh and TeamCity offer distinct advantages in terms of containerization support, Kubernetes integration, pipeline visualization, cloud platform support, GitOps capabilities, and pricing models, catering to different requirements and preferences in the CI/CD landscape.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TeamCity
TeamCity
Codefresh
Codefresh

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

Automate code analyzing, compiling, and testing processes, with having instant feedback on build progress, problems, and test failures, all in a simple, intuitive web-interface; Simplified setup: create projects from just a VCS repository URL;Run multiple builds and tests under different configurations and platforms simultaneously; Make sure your team sustains an uninterrupted workflow with the help of Pretested commits and Personal builds; Have build history insight with customizable statistics on build duration, success rate, code quality, and custom metrics; Enable cost-effective on-demand build infrastructure scaling thanks to tight integration with Amazon EC2; Easily extend TeamCity functionality and add new integrations using Java API; Great visual project representation. Track any changes made by any user in the system, filter projects and choose style of visual change status representation;
Instant Dev, test and feature preview environments: Enables all team members to run any image as a standalone or composition for feature preview, manual testing, bug reproduction and more. Collaborate on features before pushing them into staging and production.; Testing with every step: Configure your pipeline to run integration and unit tests with every step; Instantly test all code changes in the Codefresh build system before pushing to staging & production. Run integration, unit tests in parallel.; 360° view of Docker images: View commit info, test results and build logs for all images; Manage Docker image labels and status, comment and see new feature branches; search and filter based on any attribute.; Out-of-the-box Docker buildpack for all technologies: Seamlessly package your code in a Docker image. Quickly associate a Dockerfile with your repo by selecting the repository technology stack (Java, Node, PHP, etc.). Codefresh then adds a template for Dockerizing apps.; View and Access Running Container Logs: Access each container log directly from within the Codefresh platform. This lets you easily perform root-cause analysis on failed services and allows you to see logs in high debug model level.; Support for Docker Compose 1 & 2: Manage your Docker Compose file natively in one place, with support for both Docker Compose versions 1 and 2. Use a built-in wizard to write Docker Compose files quickly.; YAML file support: Customize and easily define your pipeline steps using a codefresh.yml file.
Statistics
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
64
Followers
1.1K
Followers
111
Votes
316
Votes
47
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 61
    Easy to configure
  • 37
    Reliable and high-quality
  • 32
    On premise
  • 32
    User friendly
  • 32
    Github integration
Cons
  • 3
    High costs for more than three build agents
  • 2
    Proprietary
  • 2
    User-friendly
  • 2
    User friendly
Pros
  • 11
    Fastest and easiest way to work with Docker
  • 7
    Great support/fast builds/awesome ui
  • 6
    Great onboarding
  • 5
    Freestyle build steps to support custom CI/CD scripting
  • 4
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 1
    Questionable product quality and stability
  • 1
    Expensive compared to alternatives
Integrations
Slack
Slack
Quay.io
Quay.io
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
BinTray
BinTray
Docker Cloud
Docker Cloud
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
HipChat
HipChat
BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter

What are some alternatives to TeamCity, Codefresh?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana