Crowdin vs Smartling

Overview

Crowdin

Stacks101

Followers97

Votes33

Smartling

Stacks8

Followers20

Votes0

Crowdin vs Smartling: What are the differences?

## Introduction
In the realm of localization and translation management platforms, both Crowdin and Smartling are top contenders. Understanding the key differences between them can help organizations choose the right tool for their localization needs.

1. **Integration Capabilities**: Crowdin offers seamless integration with various tools and platforms such as Bitbucket, GitHub, Jira, and Slack, making it easy to incorporate localization into the existing development workflow. On the other hand, Smartling provides integration with a narrower range of tools and platforms, focusing more on enterprise-level integrations like Adobe Experience Manager and Salesforce Marketing Cloud.

2. **Pricing Structure**: Crowdin follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, allowing users to pay for the services they use without being tied down to long-term contracts. In contrast, Smartling typically requires users to commit to annual contracts, which may be less flexible for organizations with fluctuating localization needs.

3. **Collaboration Tools**: Crowdin emphasizes collaboration among team members, offering features like real-time translation editing, comments, and in-context localization. Smartling, on the other hand, focuses more on workflow automation and project management, providing robust tools for streamlining the localization process.

4. **Customization Options**: Crowdin provides extensive customization options, allowing users to tailor the platform to their specific localization requirements. Smartling, while customizable to a certain extent, may be more limited in terms of flexibility and adaptability to unique localization workflows.

5. **Support for Various File Formats**: Crowdin supports a wide range of file formats, making it versatile and accommodating for different types of localization projects. Smartling, while also supporting many common file formats, may have limitations in handling more specialized or less commonly used file types.

6. **Focus on User Experience**: Crowdin places a strong emphasis on user experience, with an intuitive interface and user-friendly features that make localization management accessible to users of all levels. Smartling, while also user-friendly, may prioritize enterprise-level functionality and scalability over simplicity in user interface design.

In Summary, understanding the nuances of localization platforms like Crowdin and Smartling can help organizations make informed decisions when choosing the right tool for their localization needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Crowdin	Smartling
Crowdin is localization management software enchanced by AI for teams. Translate your apps, websites, games, documentation, marketing campaigns, and other content into 100+ languages. Create a native experience for your global customers.	Smartling takes the complexity, cost and time out of the translation process by providing companies with an automated, cloud-based translation management platform and comprehensive translation services.
Translation Memory - no need to translate the same strings again; Glossary - keep your project terminology consistent; Screenshots - provide context to get relevant translations; 600+ Integrations: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Google Play, Android Studio, Sketch, Figma; Quality Assurance checks - no typos, missing symbols, and other mismatches; In-Context - check how would ready translations look with your web application; Machine Translations - pre-translate using a translation engine of your choice; Reports - estimate and count translation costs, track translation’s progress and more; Tasks - create, discuss, track progress to make sure translations and proofreads are done in time;	Translation memory;Custom workflows;Business intelligence;Website proxy tool;Translation quality tools; Integrations
Statistics
Stacks 101	Stacks 8
Followers 97	Followers 20
Votes 33	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 10 Powerful tools and excellent customer support 4 Steep prices 🙁 4 Allows community-based translation 4 It's great tool for localization 3 GitHub integration (opens PR on translation done)	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Google Drive Constant Contact Unbounce Dropbox Squarespace Shopify ActiveCampaign Contentful prismic.io Status.io	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Crowdin, Smartling?

Localazy

Reportedly (by developers) the most friendly localization and translation management platform.

Phrase

The Phrase Localization Platform is a unique, AI-powered language platform that integrates translation, scoring, and automation tools in one place for businesses and language service providers.

Weblate

Weblate is a libre software web-based continuous localization system used by over 1150+ opensource projects & companies in over 115+ countries around the World.

GitLocalize

GitLocalize is a continuous localization tool built for communities and teams that want to simplify their workflow when translating their content. GitLocalize automatically syncs with your repository so you can keep your workflow on GitHub.

OneSky

OneSky provides a powerful cloud-based translation management system (TMS) that streamlines the entire translation management process for mobile apps, websites and documents. OneSky offers professional translation services and application testing solutions in 60+ languages. Over 3,000 companies have used OneSky to expand their global presence.

Transifex

Transifex is a cloud-based localization platform built to help you manage the translation and localization of your app, website, video subtitles, and more. It acts as a repository for your content (think GitHub for translation) and includes tools for developers to get that content into Transifex automatically. Transifex also provides translators a web interface to submit translations.

Tran.sl

Real time marketplace of translation services. We help companies make their products global by translating their software, social media and user generated content. Social media localization, document translation, software localization, API

shipi18n

Shipi18n is a translation API built for developers. Translate JSON and i18n files to 100+ languages while automatically preserving placeholders like {name}, {{count}}, and %s. Key features: • Native i18next support with CLDR pluralization (auto-generates _one, _few, _many, _other) • Placeholder preservation for ICU MessageFormat • 90-day translation memory caching • Key-based pricing (pay per unique string, not API calls) Developer tools: npm SDK, CLI, GitHub Action, Vite plugin, i18next backend

Soniox

Transcribe and translate speech in over 60 languages, in real-time, with high accuracy.

i18next

It is an internationalization-framework written in and for JavaScript. But it's much more than that! It goes beyond just providing the standard i18n features such as (plurals, context, interpolation, format). It provides you with a complete solution to localize your product from web to mobile and desktop.

Related Comparisons

Crowdin vs Smartling: What are the differences?

## Introduction
In the realm of localization and translation management platforms, both Crowdin and Smartling are top contenders. Understanding the key differences between them can help organizations choose the right tool for their localization needs.

1. **Integration Capabilities**: Crowdin offers seamless integration with various tools and platforms such as Bitbucket, GitHub, Jira, and Slack, making it easy to incorporate localization into the existing development workflow. On the other hand, Smartling provides integration with a narrower range of tools and platforms, focusing more on enterprise-level integrations like Adobe Experience Manager and Salesforce Marketing Cloud.

2. **Pricing Structure**: Crowdin follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, allowing users to pay for the services they use without being tied down to long-term contracts. In contrast, Smartling typically requires users to commit to annual contracts, which may be less flexible for organizations with fluctuating localization needs.

3. **Collaboration Tools**: Crowdin emphasizes collaboration among team members, offering features like real-time translation editing, comments, and in-context localization. Smartling, on the other hand, focuses more on workflow automation and project management, providing robust tools for streamlining the localization process.

4. **Customization Options**: Crowdin provides extensive customization options, allowing users to tailor the platform to their specific localization requirements. Smartling, while customizable to a certain extent, may be more limited in terms of flexibility and adaptability to unique localization workflows.

5. **Support for Various File Formats**: Crowdin supports a wide range of file formats, making it versatile and accommodating for different types of localization projects. Smartling, while also supporting many common file formats, may have limitations in handling more specialized or less commonly used file types.

6. **Focus on User Experience**: Crowdin places a strong emphasis on user experience, with an intuitive interface and user-friendly features that make localization management accessible to users of all levels. Smartling, while also user-friendly, may prioritize enterprise-level functionality and scalability over simplicity in user interface design.

In Summary, understanding the nuances of localization platforms like Crowdin and Smartling can help organizations make informed decisions when choosing the right tool for their localization needs.

Crowdin vs Smartling

Overview