Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Capistrano vs Docker: What are the differences?
Introduction
Capistrano and Docker are both widely used tools in the world of software development and deployment. While both tools can be used to deploy applications, they have significant differences in their approach and functionality. In this article, we will explore the key differences between Capistrano and Docker.
Deployment Process: Capistrano is a remote server automation tool, specifically designed to automate the deployment of web applications to servers. It follows a sequential deployment process, where the tasks are executed one after another. On the other hand, Docker is a containerization platform that allows applications to be packaged in lightweight, isolated containers. Docker follows an image-based deployment process, where each application is packaged as a container image and can be deployed as multiple instances across different environments.
Isolation and Portability: Capistrano relies on the underlying server architecture to deploy applications, resulting in dependencies on specific operating systems and server configurations. Docker, on the other hand, provides a consistent and portable environment by encapsulating the application and its dependencies within a container. This ensures that the application runs identically across different environments, making it easier to deploy and manage.
Scalability and Resource Management: Capistrano does not offer built-in support for scaling applications horizontally. It relies on the server's infrastructure for scaling. Docker, on the other hand, provides native support for container orchestration through tools like Kubernetes and Docker Swarm. These tools allow for easy scaling of containers across multiple hosts, providing better resource management and load balancing.
Dependency Management: Capistrano primarily focuses on deploying applications and may require manual management of dependencies and configurations on the server. Docker, on the other hand, allows for easy management of dependencies by encapsulating them within the container image. This ensures that the application has all the necessary dependencies, configurations, and libraries required to run smoothly.
Rollbacks and Versioning: Capistrano provides built-in support for rolling back deployments to previous versions if issues are detected. It also allows for version management, enabling easy switching between different versions of an application. Docker, however, provides more flexibility in terms of rollbacks and versioning. Each container image can be tagged with a unique version, allowing for easy rollbacks and managing multiple versions simultaneously.
Development Environment: Capistrano is primarily used for deployment and automation in production environments. It may not be as suitable for development environments, as it focuses on server automation rather than containerization. Docker, on the other hand, is widely used for creating development environments that closely resemble production environments. It allows developers to create containers with all the necessary dependencies for the development process, providing consistency and reproducibility.
In summary, Capistrano is a remote server automation tool for sequential deployment, while Docker is a containerization platform that provides isolation, portability, scalability, dependency management, and version control. Docker is more suitable for creating consistent development environments and enables easy scaling and management of applications across different environments.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of Capistrano
- Automated deployment with several custom recipes121
- Simple63
- Ruby23
- Release-folders with symlinks11
- Multistage deployment9
- Cryptic syntax2
- Integrated rollback2
- Supports aws1
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation692
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Fast and Portable6
- Easy setup6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- It's dope3
- Highly useful3
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- Package the environment with the application2
- Super2
- Asdfd0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Capistrano
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3