Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Docker vs SourceTree: What are the differences?
Introduction
This Markdown code provides the key differences between Docker and SourceTree, two popular technologies used in web development and software management.
Containerization: Docker is a containerization platform that allows developers to package their applications and its dependencies into a standardized unit called a container. On the other hand, SourceTree is a graphical user interface (GUI) tool for managing Git repositories. While Docker manages containers, SourceTree focuses on managing Git repositories and performing Git-related operations.
Platform: Docker is a cross-platform technology that can be used on various operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux. It provides a consistent platform for deploying and running applications. In contrast, SourceTree is primarily designed for macOS and Windows operating systems, limiting its platform compatibility.
Functionality: Docker offers a wide range of functionalities for building, shipping, and running applications. It allows for easy scalability, version control, and orchestration of containers. On the other hand, SourceTree mainly focuses on providing a user-friendly interface for working with Git repositories. It offers features like branch management, resolving merge conflicts, and visualizing commit history.
User Interface: Docker primarily uses command-line interface (CLI) for interacting with its features and functionalities. Although it also has a web-based interface called Docker Dashboard, the majority of interactions and management tasks are performed through the CLI. In contrast, SourceTree provides a GUI that simplifies Git operations by providing visual representations of branches, commits, and files.
Integration: Docker seamlessly integrates with various tools and services commonly used in the software development lifecycle. It supports integration with popular version control systems, continuous integration/delivery (CI/CD) pipelines, and cloud platforms. SourceTree, being a Git-specific tool, offers integration with various Git hosting services like GitHub and Bitbucket, as well as with external Git clients like GitKraken.
Learning Curve: Using Docker requires a certain learning curve, as it involves understanding containerization concepts, Dockerfile configuration, and Docker command-line operations. However, once these concepts are grasped, Docker offers a powerful and flexible environment for deploying applications. On the other hand, SourceTree aims to simplify the Git workflow by providing an intuitive graphical interface. It is generally easier to start using SourceTree for managing Git repositories, especially for users who are less comfortable with command-line operations.
In Summary, Docker and SourceTree differ in terms of their primary focus, functionality, user interface, platform compatibility, integration options, and learning curve. While Docker provides a containerization platform for running applications, SourceTree is a graphical user interface tool for managing Git repositories.
I explored many Git Desktop tools for the Mac and my final decision was to use Fork. What I love about for that it contains three features, I like about a Git Client tool.
It allows * to handle day to day git operations (least important for me as I am cli junkie) * it helps to investigate the history * most important of all, it has a repo manager which many other tools are missing.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation692
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Easy setup6
- Fast and Portable6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- Highly useful3
- It's dope3
- Package the environment with the application2
- Super2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- Asdfd0
Pros of SourceTree
- Visual history and branch view205
- Beautiful UI164
- Easy repository browsing134
- Gitflow support87
- Interactive stage or discard by hunks or lines75
- Great branch visualization22
- Ui/ux and user-friendliness18
- Best Git Client UI/Features8
- Search commit messages7
- Available for Windows and macOS5
- Log only one file1
- Search file content1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3
Cons of SourceTree
- Crashes often12
- So many bugs8
- Fetching is slow sometimes7
- No dark theme (Windows)5
- Extremely slow5
- Very unstable5
- Can't select text in diff (windows)4
- Freezes quite frequently3
- Can't scale window from top corners3
- UI blinking2
- Windows version worse than mac version2
- Installs to AppData folder (windows)2
- Diff makes tab indentation look like spaces2
- Windows and Mac versions are very different2
- Diff appears as if space indented even if its tabs2
- Doesn't have an option for git init2
- Useless for merge conflict resolution2
- Doesn't differentiate submodules from parent repos2
- Requires bitbucket account2
- Generally hard to like1
- No reflog support1
- Bases binary check on filesize1
- Can't add remotes by right clicking remotes (windows)1