StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Drone.io vs Gerrit Code Review

Drone.io vs Gerrit Code Review

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Drone.io
Drone.io
Stacks884
Followers456
Votes258
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review
Stacks116
Followers223
Votes67

Drone.io vs Gerrit Code Review: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Drone.io and Gerrit Code Review are two popular tools used in the software development process. Here, we will outline the key differences between these two tools.

1. Integration with Version Control Systems: Drone.io has strong integration with various Version Control Systems (VCS) such as GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab, and others, making it easier for developers to set up and use. On the other hand, Gerrit Code Review primarily focuses on integration with Git, offering more advanced code review features specific to Git repositories.

2. Continuous Integration vs. Code Review Focus: Drone.io is primarily a Continuous Integration tool, focusing on automating the build, testing, and deployment processes in software development. In contrast, Gerrit Code Review is specifically designed for code reviews, providing a platform for developers to collaborate, review, and approve changes before they are merged into the codebase.

3. Licensing and Open Source Community: Drone.io is licensed under the Apache License 2.0 and has a thriving open-source community contributing to its development and support. On the other hand, Gerrit Code Review is maintained by Google and released under the Apache License 2.0, with continuous contributions from the open-source community.

4. User Interface and User Experience: Drone.io offers a modern and intuitive user interface, making it easier for developers to navigate and configure pipelines and workflows. Conversely, Gerrit Code Review has a more traditional and text-based interface focused on providing detailed code review capabilities and feedback mechanisms for developers.

5. Extensibility and Plugin Ecosystem: Drone.io provides a robust plugin ecosystem that allows developers to extend its functionality and integrate with various third-party services and tools. In contrast, Gerrit Code Review has a more limited plugin ecosystem, with a focus on providing core code review features and integrations with specific tools like Jenkins for Continuous Integration.

6. Authentication and Security Features: Drone.io offers flexible authentication options, including support for OAuth, LDAP, and other authentication mechanisms, along with role-based access control for securing pipelines and workflows. On the other hand, Gerrit Code Review emphasizes secure code review processes, with features like signed-off-by tags and integration with identity providers for authentication and authorization.

Summary: In summary, Drone.io focuses on Continuous Integration with broad VCS support and a modern UI, while Gerrit Code Review specializes in code reviews for Git repositories with a strong emphasis on security and collaboration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Drone.io, Gerrit Code Review

Somnath
Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceonCircleCICircleCIDrone.ioDrone.ioGitHub ActionsGitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Drone.io
Drone.io
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

Free for open-source;GitHub, BitBucket integration;Browser testing;Deplot with Amazon, Heroku, Google AppEngine;Flexible scripting;Team billing;
git repository hosting; pre-commit code review; commenting on diffs; updating a single commit with multiple patch sets; project-based access control; protecting repositories
Statistics
Stacks
884
Stacks
116
Followers
456
Followers
223
Votes
258
Votes
67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 51
    Open source
  • 50
    Built on docker
  • 27
    Free for open source
  • 23
    GitHub integration
  • 18
    Easy Setup
Cons
  • 3
    Very basic documentation
Pros
  • 14
    Code review
  • 12
    Good workflow
  • 11
    Cleaner repository story
  • 10
    Open source
  • 10
    Good integration with Jenkins
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Heroku
Heroku
GitHub
GitHub
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
dotCloud
dotCloud
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to Drone.io, Gerrit Code Review?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana