StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. Electron vs Haxe

Electron vs Haxe

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Haxe
Haxe
Stacks151
Followers59
Votes0
GitHub Stars6.6K
Forks688
Electron
Electron
Stacks11.6K
Followers10.0K
Votes148

Electron vs Haxe: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In the realm of web development, understanding the key differences between Electron and Haxe is crucial for choosing the most suitable option for your project. This markdown will outline the distinct characteristics of Electron and Haxe to aid in decision-making.

  1. Platform Compatibility: One significant difference between Electron and Haxe is their platform compatibility. Electron is commonly utilized for building desktop applications that can run on multiple platforms such as Windows, macOS, and Linux. On the other hand, Haxe is a programming language that can compile to various target platforms, including JavaScript, C++, and Flash.

  2. Use Cases: Electron is predominantly chosen for developing desktop applications that closely resemble native applications and provide access to system resources. In contrast, Haxe is typically employed for developing cross-platform applications, games, and complex multimedia applications due to its ability to target multiple platforms effectively.

  3. Development Workflow: When it comes to the development workflow, Electron provides a straightforward setup process that allows developers to create desktop applications using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. In contrast, Haxe offers a more structured approach to development by utilizing a unified language and compiler, enabling developers to target various platforms seamlessly.

  4. Community Support: In terms of community support, Electron boasts a large and active community that contributes to the development of numerous plugins, libraries, and extensions, enriching the development experience. Conversely, while Haxe has a dedicated community, it may not be as extensive as Electron's community, potentially impacting the availability of resources and support.

  5. Performance: Another key difference lies in the performance aspect. Electron applications may encounter performance issues due to their reliance on web technologies, which can lead to higher memory consumption and slower execution. However, Haxe applications are known for their high performance, thanks to the language's efficient compilation process and support for target-specific optimizations.

  6. Learning Curve: Lastly, the learning curve associated with Electron and Haxe differs significantly. Electron allows developers familiar with web technologies to transition smoothly into desktop application development, leveraging their existing knowledge. On the other hand, learning Haxe may require adapting to a new programming language and understanding its unique features, potentially posing a steeper learning curve for some developers.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Electron and Haxe is essential for selecting the appropriate technology stack based on the project requirements, platform compatibility, and development preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Haxe
Haxe
Electron
Electron

It is an open source toolkit based on a modern, high level, strictly typed programming language, a cross-compiler, a complete cross-platform standard library and ways to access each platform's native capabilities.

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Extension methods; Functional programming; Ability to target alternate platforms such as C#.NET; Ability to target devices that support only C++
Use HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Chromium and Node.js to build your app.;Electron is open source; maintained by GitHub and an active community.;Electron apps build and run on Mac, Windows, and Linux.;Automatic updates;Crash reporting;Windows installers;Debugging & profiling;Native menus & notifications
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
688
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
151
Stacks
11.6K
Followers
59
Followers
10.0K
Votes
0
Votes
148
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 0
    [object Object]
Pros
  • 69
    Easy to make rich cross platform desktop applications
  • 53
    Open source
  • 14
    Great looking apps such as Slack and Visual Studio Code
  • 8
    Because it's cross platform
  • 4
    Use Node.js in the Main Process
Cons
  • 19
    Uses a lot of memory
  • 8
    User experience never as good as a native app
  • 4
    No proper documentation
  • 4
    Does not native
  • 1
    Wrong reference for dom inspection
Integrations
C++
C++
HTML5
HTML5
Python
Python
Node.js
Node.js
C#
C#
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Haxe, Electron?

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Mustache

Mustache

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

Slim Lang

Slim Lang

Slim is a template language whose goal is to reduce the view syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic. It started as an exercise to see how much could be removed from a standard html template (<, >, closing tags, etc...). As more people took an interest in Slim, the functionality grew and so did the flexibility of the syntax.

RactiveJS

RactiveJS

Ractive was originally created at theguardian.com to produce news applications. Ractive takes your Mustache templates and transforms them into a lightweight representation of the DOM – then when your data changes, it intelligently updates the real DOM.

Sciter

Sciter

It brings a stack of web technologies to desktop UI development. Web designers, and developers, can reuse their experience and expertise in creating modern looking desktop applications.

wxWidgets

wxWidgets

It is a C++ library that lets developers create applications for Windows, macOS, Linux and other platforms with a single code base. It has popular language bindings for Python, Perl, Ruby and many other languages, and unlike other cross-platform toolkits, it gives applications a truly native look and feel because it uses the platform's native API rather than emulating the GUI. It's also extensive, free, open-source and mature.

EJS

EJS

It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. No religiousness about how to organize things. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. It's just plain JavaScript.

Qt5

Qt5

It is a full development framework with tools designed to streamline the creation of applications and user interfaces for desktop, embedded, and mobile platforms.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase