GeoEngineer聽vs聽Terraform

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

GeoEngineer

51
61
+ 1
0
Terraform

7.8K
5.8K
+ 1
293
Add tool

GeoEngineer vs Terraform: What are the differences?

What is GeoEngineer? Ruby DSL and DSL (geo) to codify then plan and execute changes to cloud resources, by Coinbase. GeoEngineer uses Terraform to plan and execute changes, so the DSL to describe resources is similar to Terraform's. GeoEngineer's DSL also provides programming and object oriented features like inheritance, abstraction, branching and looping.

What is Terraform? Describe your complete infrastructure as code and build resources across providers. With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

GeoEngineer and Terraform can be primarily classified as "Infrastructure Build" tools.

GeoEngineer and Terraform are both open source tools. Terraform with 17.7K GitHub stars and 4.83K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than GeoEngineer with 397 GitHub stars and 49 GitHub forks.

Decisions about GeoEngineer and Terraform
Kirill Shirinkin
Cloud and DevOps Consultant at mkdev | 2 upvotes 路 20K views

Ok, so first - AWS Copilot is CloudFormation under the hood, but the way it works results in you not thinking about CFN anymore. AWS found the right balance with Copilot - it's insanely simple to setup production-ready multi-account environment with many services inside, with CI/CD out of the box etc etc. It's pretty new, but even now it was enough to launch Transcripto, which uses may be a dozen of different AWS services, all bound together by Copilot.

See more

Because Pulumi uses real programming languages, you can actually write abstractions for your infrastructure code, which is incredibly empowering. You still 'describe' your desired state, but by having a programming language at your fingers, you can factor out patterns, and package it up for easier consumption.

See more
Sergey Ivanov
Overview

We use Terraform to manage AWS cloud environment for the project. It is pretty complex, largely static, security-focused, and constantly evolving.

Terraform provides descriptive (declarative) way of defining the target configuration, where it can work out the dependencies between configuration elements and apply differences without re-provisioning the entire cloud stack.

Advantages

Terraform is vendor-neutral in a way that it is using a common configuration language (HCL) with plugins (providers) for multiple cloud and service providers.

Terraform keeps track of the previous state of the deployment and applies incremental changes, resulting in faster deployment times.

Terraform allows us to share reusable modules between projects. We have built an impressive library of modules internally, which makes it very easy to assemble a new project from pre-fabricated building blocks.

Disadvantages

Software is imperfect, and Terraform is no exception. Occasionally we hit annoying bugs that we have to work around. The interaction with any underlying APIs is encapsulated inside 3rd party Terraform providers, and any bug fixes or new features require a provider release. Some providers have very poor coverage of the underlying APIs.

Terraform is not great for managing highly dynamic parts of cloud environments. That part is better delegated to other tools or scripts.

Terraform state may go out of sync with the target environment or with the source configuration, which often results in painful reconciliation.

See more
Pros of GeoEngineer
Pros of Terraform
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 100
      Infrastructure as code
    • 68
      Declarative syntax
    • 43
      Planning
    • 26
      Simple
    • 23
      Parallelism
    • 6
      Cloud agnostic
    • 5
      It's like coding your infrastructure in simple English
    • 4
      Well-documented
    • 3
      Automates infrastructure deployments
    • 3
      Platform agnostic
    • 3
      Immutable infrastructure
    • 2
      Automation
    • 2
      Scales to hundreds of hosts
    • 2
      Extendable
    • 2
      Portability
    • 1
      Lightweight

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of GeoEngineer
    Cons of Terraform
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 1
        Doesn't have full support to GKE

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is GeoEngineer?

      GeoEngineer uses Terraform to plan and execute changes, so the DSL to describe resources is similar to Terraform's. GeoEngineer's DSL also provides programming and object oriented features like inheritance, abstraction, branching and looping.

      What is Terraform?

      With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use GeoEngineer?
      What companies use Terraform?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with GeoEngineer?
      What tools integrate with Terraform?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      GitHubPythonGit+22
      17
      12955
      JavaScriptGitHubPython+42
      52
      19163
      What are some alternatives to GeoEngineer and Terraform?
      AWS CloudFormation
      You can use AWS CloudFormation鈥檚 sample templates or create your own templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run your application. You don鈥檛 need to figure out the order in which AWS services need to be provisioned or the subtleties of how to make those dependencies work.
      Packer
      Packer automates the creation of any type of machine image. It embraces modern configuration management by encouraging you to use automated scripts to install and configure the software within your Packer-made images.
      Pulumi
      Pulumi is a cloud development platform that makes creating cloud programs easy and productive. Skip the YAML and just write code. Pulumi is multi-language, multi-cloud and fully extensible in both its engine and ecosystem of packages.
      Yocto
      It is an open source collaboration project that helps developers create custom Linux-based systems regardless of the hardware architecture. It provides a flexible set of tools and a space where embedded developers worldwide can share technologies, software stacks, configurations, and best practices that can be used to create tailored Linux images for embedded and IOT devices, or anywhere a customized Linux OS is needed.
      Habitat
      Habitat is a new approach to automation that focuses on the application instead of the infrastructure it runs on. With Habitat, the apps you build, deploy, and manage behave consistently in any runtime鈥夆斺塵etal, VMs, containers, and PaaS. You'll spend less time on the environment and more time building features.
      See all alternatives
      Interest over time
      News about GeoEngineer
      More news