StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. In Browser Testing
  5. Ghost Inspector vs Testrail

Ghost Inspector vs Testrail

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ghost Inspector
Ghost Inspector
Stacks64
Followers117
Votes22
Testrail
Testrail
Stacks218
Followers265
Votes30

Ghost Inspector vs Testrail: What are the differences?

  1. Integration Capabilities: Ghost Inspector offers integration with popular tools like Slack, Jira, and GitHub, allowing for seamless collaboration and reporting. In contrast, Testrail has its own plugin system that allows for integrations with a wider range of tools, giving users more flexibility in their workflows.

  2. Focus on Automation: Ghost Inspector primarily focuses on automated browser testing, making it a preferred choice for teams looking to streamline their testing processes. On the other hand, Testrail is more comprehensive, offering test case management, test execution, and reporting capabilities in addition to automation features.

  3. User Interface: Ghost Inspector boasts a user-friendly, intuitive interface that caters to both technical and non-technical users alike, simplifying the testing process. Testrail, while user-friendly, is more geared towards testers and QA professionals, offering advanced features that cater to their specific needs.

  4. Customization Options: Testrail provides extensive customization options, allowing users to tailor their testing workflows and reports to meet their unique requirements. Ghost Inspector, while offering some level of customization, may not be as flexible in catering to highly specific testing needs.

  5. Scalability: Testrail is known for its scalability, making it suitable for teams of all sizes, from small businesses to large enterprises. Ghost Inspector is more suited for small to medium-sized teams or projects due to its focus on simplified automated testing processes.

  6. Price Point: Ghost Inspector offers a more cost-effective solution compared to Testrail, making it a budget-friendly choice for teams looking for a comprehensive automated testing tool at a lower price point.

In Summary, Ghost Inspector and Testrail differ in integration capabilities, focus on automation, user interface, customization options, scalability, and price point.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Ghost Inspector
Ghost Inspector
Testrail
Testrail

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

Automated browser testing from the cloud;Chrome extension for test recording;GUI editor for test building and editing;Screenshot comparison for catching display issues;API for integration into your CI setup;Selenium test export option
Efficiently manage test cases, plans and runs;Boost testing productivity significantly;Get real-time insights into your testing progress;Integrates with your issue tracker & test automation
Statistics
Stacks
64
Stacks
218
Followers
117
Followers
265
Votes
22
Votes
30
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Simple test editor
  • 3
    No code required
  • 3
    Runscope integration
  • 2
    Screenshot comparison
  • 2
    Videos of every test run
Cons
  • 1
    Support Cross-device testing (device, web)
  • 0
    Load & Performance testing
  • 0
    Flash Support inside browser
Pros
  • 10
    Designed for testers
  • 6
    Easy to use
  • 5
    Easy Intergration
  • 5
    Intutive
  • 3
    Customer Support
Cons
  • 4
    Pricey
Integrations
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Runscope
Runscope
GitHub
GitHub
Heroku
Heroku
CircleCI
CircleCI
Travis CI
Travis CI
AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
HipChat
HipChat
GitHub
GitHub
Jira
Jira
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Pivotal Tracker
Pivotal Tracker
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Mantis
Mantis
Redmine
Redmine
Gemini
Gemini
Bugzilla
Bugzilla

What are some alternatives to Ghost Inspector, Testrail?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Zapier

Zapier

Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana