StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitHub vs Terraform

GitHub vs Terraform

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub
GitHub
Stacks295.6K
Followers259.0K
Votes10.4K
Terraform
Terraform
Stacks22.9K
Followers14.7K
Votes344
GitHub Stars47.0K
Forks10.1K

GitHub vs Terraform: What are the differences?

Introduction:

GitHub and Terraform are both widely used in the software development industry, but they serve different purposes and have distinct features. Understanding the key differences between GitHub and Terraform is crucial for developers and organizations to effectively manage their code and infrastructure. Below are the key differences between the two platforms.

  1. Version Control vs. Infrastructure as Code: GitHub is primarily used as a version control system for managing source code, allowing developers to collaboratively work on projects, track changes, and merge code branches. On the other hand, Terraform is an infrastructure as code tool that enables the provisioning and management of infrastructure resources. It helps automate the creation, modification, and destruction of infrastructure components such as virtual machines, networks, and storage.

  2. Primary Functionality: GitHub focuses on facilitating collaborative software development through features like code repositories, project management tools, issue tracking, and pull requests. It provides a platform for developers to host and share their code, collaborate with teams, and enable version control. In contrast, Terraform specializes in infrastructure provisioning and management by defining infrastructure configurations using declarative language syntax, enabling automation and consistency in infrastructure deployments.

  3. Target Audience: GitHub primarily caters to software developers, enabling them to store and manage their code, collaborate with other developers, and leverage features for code review and continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD). Meanwhile, Terraform is designed for infrastructure and operations teams responsible for managing and deploying infrastructure resources in a reproducible and scalable manner. It helps bridge the gap between developers and infrastructure management by enabling infrastructure as code practices.

  4. Deployment Scope: GitHub focuses on code deployment through approaches like continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, which automate the testing, building, and deployment of applications. It helps streamline the release and delivery of software products. On the other hand, Terraform targets the deployment of infrastructure resources, allowing for the automation and management of large-scale infrastructure deployments across cloud providers, virtualized environments, and other platforms.

  5. Third-Party Integrations: GitHub has a robust ecosystem of integrations, plugins, and extensions that allow developers to enhance their development workflow. It offers integrations with popular development tools, issue trackers, project management systems, and continuous integration tools. In comparison, Terraform provides integrations with various cloud providers and infrastructure platforms, allowing users to define and manage resources across multiple clouds and on-premises environments in a unified manner.

  6. Granularity of Control: While GitHub provides fine-grained control over code repositories, access privileges, and collaboration workflows, Terraform offers granular control over infrastructure resources. Terraform enables the definition of infrastructure configurations down to the resource level, allowing users to specify the exact specifications, dependencies, and behavior of individual resources within their infrastructure stacks.

In Summary, GitHub primarily serves as a version control system and collaborative platform for software development, while Terraform focuses on infrastructure provisioning and management through infrastructure as code practices.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

GitHub
GitHub
Terraform
Terraform

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions
Infrastructure as Code: Infrastructure is described using a high-level configuration syntax. This allows a blueprint of your datacenter to be versioned and treated as you would any other code. Additionally, infrastructure can be shared and re-used.;Execution Plans: Terraform has a "planning" step where it generates an execution plan. The execution plan shows what Terraform will do when you call apply. This lets you avoid any surprises when Terraform manipulates infrastructure.;Resource Graph: Terraform builds a graph of all your resources, and parallelizes the creation and modification of any non-dependent resources. Because of this, Terraform builds infrastructure as efficiently as possible, and operators get insight into dependencies in their infrastructure.;Change Automation: Complex changesets can be applied to your infrastructure with minimal human interaction. With the previously mentioned execution plan and resource graph, you know exactly what Terraform will change and in what order, avoiding many possible human errors
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
47.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
10.1K
Stacks
295.6K
Stacks
22.9K
Followers
259.0K
Followers
14.7K
Votes
10.4K
Votes
344
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1774
    Open source friendly
  • 1463
    Easy source control
  • 1254
    Nice UI
  • 1137
    Great for team collaboration
  • 868
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 56
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 38
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
Pros
  • 121
    Infrastructure as code
  • 73
    Declarative syntax
  • 45
    Planning
  • 28
    Simple
  • 24
    Parallelism
Cons
  • 1
    Doesn't have full support to GKE
Integrations
Grove
Grove
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Airbrake
Airbrake
Codeship
Codeship
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
BugHerd
BugHerd
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
HipChat
HipChat
CopperEgg
CopperEgg
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
Heroku
Heroku
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
CloudFlare
CloudFlare
DNSimple
DNSimple
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Consul
Consul
Equinix Metal
Equinix Metal
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
OpenStack
OpenStack
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine

What are some alternatives to GitHub, Terraform?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Ansible

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Capistrano

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Salt

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana