StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitHub vs Testrail

GitHub vs Testrail

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub
GitHub
Stacks295.6K
Followers259.0K
Votes10.4K
Testrail
Testrail
Stacks218
Followers265
Votes30

GitHub vs Testrail: What are the differences?

Introduction:

GitHub and TestRail are both valuable tools used in software development, but they serve different purposes. It is important to understand the key differences between these two platforms in order to choose the right tool for your specific needs.

  1. Primary Functionality: GitHub is a platform mainly used for version control and collaboration on coding projects. It provides a platform for developers to store, manage, and collaborate on coding projects. On the other hand, TestRail is a test management tool that helps teams efficiently manage, organize, and execute manual and automated tests.

  2. Focus on Development vs. Testing: GitHub is specifically tailored for developers and focuses on version control and collaboration aspects essential for software development. In contrast, TestRail is designed for quality assurance teams to aid in managing test cases, running test runs, and tracking defects throughout the testing process.

  3. Integration Capabilities: GitHub offers various integrations with different tools and services commonly used in software development, such as CI/CD pipelines, issue tracking systems, and project management tools. TestRail also provides integrations with test automation tools, bug tracking systems, and other testing-related tools to create a streamlined testing process.

  4. User Interface and User Experience: GitHub has a more developer-centric user interface optimized for coding-related tasks, like pull requests, code reviews, and branching strategies. TestRail, on the other hand, offers a user-friendly interface tailored for test case creation, execution, and reporting, making it easier for testers to manage their testing activities.

  5. Open Source vs. Licensed Software: GitHub is a widely used open-source platform that offers both free and paid plans to accommodate the needs of individual developers and organizations. TestRail, on the other hand, is a licensed software that requires a subscription fee for usage, and it provides different pricing plans based on the number of users and features required.

  6. Audience and User Base: GitHub caters to a broader audience of developers, including individual developers, open-source projects, and large enterprises, making it a versatile platform for collaborative coding. TestRail targets quality assurance and testing professionals in various industries, offering specialized features to optimize the testing process for QA teams.

In Summary, GitHub is primarily focused on version control and collaboration for developers, while TestRail is a test management tool designed for quality assurance teams to manage and track testing activities efficiently.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitHub, Testrail

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub
GitHub
Testrail
Testrail

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions
Efficiently manage test cases, plans and runs;Boost testing productivity significantly;Get real-time insights into your testing progress;Integrates with your issue tracker & test automation
Statistics
Stacks
295.6K
Stacks
218
Followers
259.0K
Followers
265
Votes
10.4K
Votes
30
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1773
    Open source friendly
  • 1463
    Easy source control
  • 1254
    Nice UI
  • 1137
    Great for team collaboration
  • 868
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 56
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 38
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
Pros
  • 10
    Designed for testers
  • 6
    Easy to use
  • 5
    Intutive
  • 5
    Easy Intergration
  • 3
    Customer Support
Cons
  • 4
    Pricey
Integrations
Grove
Grove
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Airbrake
Airbrake
Codeship
Codeship
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
BugHerd
BugHerd
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
HipChat
HipChat
CopperEgg
CopperEgg
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
Jira
Jira
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Pivotal Tracker
Pivotal Tracker
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Mantis
Mantis
Redmine
Redmine
Gemini
Gemini
Bugzilla
Bugzilla
FogBugz
FogBugz

What are some alternatives to GitHub, Testrail?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana