StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Javascript Build Tools
  5. Webpack vs gulp

Webpack vs gulp

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

gulp
gulp
Stacks15.3K
Followers9.1K
Votes1.7K
GitHub Stars33.0K
Forks4.2K
Webpack
Webpack
Stacks45.0K
Followers28.1K
Votes752
GitHub Stars65.7K
Forks9.2K

Webpack vs gulp: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Webpack and Gulp.

  1. Build and Bundling Process: Webpack is primarily used for bundling JavaScript modules and managing dependencies. It analyzes the dependencies and creates a dependency graph, allowing it to bundle all the required modules into a single file. On the other hand, Gulp is a task runner that automates the development workflow by piping the input through multiple plugins to perform tasks like minifying, concatenating, and transpiling files.

  2. Configuration Approach: Webpack requires a configuration file (webpack.config.js) to specify its behavior, such as entry points, output paths, loaders, and plugins. This configuration file provides more fine-grained control over the bundling process. Gulp, on the other hand, uses a declarative approach with a gulpfile.js. Developers define tasks using JavaScript functions, and Gulp executes these tasks in a sequential manner.

  3. Code Splitting: Webpack supports code splitting, which allows splitting the codebase into multiple chunks. This enables lazy loading, where specific parts of the application are loaded on-demand, reducing the initial load time. Gulp does not natively support code splitting and is primarily focused on performing tasks rather than managing the application's code structure.

  4. Development Server and Hot Module Replacement: Webpack provides built-in developmental server and hot module replacement (HMR) support. This allows the developer to see the changes instantly without refreshing the browser. Gulp, on the other hand, does not provide a built-in development server or HMR functionality. Developers need to use additional tools or plugins to achieve similar functionality.

  5. Extensibility and Plugin Ecosystem: Webpack has a vast plugin ecosystem, providing support for tasks beyond just bundling and code transpilation. The plugins can optimize assets, compress images, extract CSS, and more. Gulp, being a task runner, has a wide range of plugins available to automate various development tasks. However, the plugin ecosystem of Gulp is less focused on JavaScript bundling and module management compared to Webpack.

  6. Learning Curve and Community Support: Webpack has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive configuration options and advanced features. However, it also has a large and active community, providing vast resources, tutorials, and support. Gulp has a simpler learning curve, as it heavily relies on basic JavaScript knowledge. It also has a significant community, but the resources might be more focused on general task automation rather than specific use cases related to JavaScript modules.

In summary, Webpack is primarily focused on bundling and managing JavaScript modules, provides code splitting, has a complex but powerful configuration approach, and offers built-in development server and HMR. Gulp, on the other hand, is a more general-purpose task runner, focused on automating development workflows, and has a simpler configuration approach.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on gulp, Webpack

Aleksandr
Aleksandr

Contract Software Engineer - Microsoft at Microsoft-365

Dec 23, 2019

Decided

Why migrated?

I could define the next points why we have to migrate:

  • Decrease build time of our application. (It was the main cause).
  • Also jspm install takes much more time than npm install.
  • Many config files for SystemJS and JSPM. For Webpack you can use just one main config file, and you can use some separate config files for specific builds using inheritance and merge them.
301k views301k
Comments
Rob
Rob

Tech Lead at Runa

Mar 15, 2021

Decided

The developer experience Webpack gave us was not delighting anyone. It works and is stable and consistent. It is also slow and frustrating. We decided to check out Vite as an alternative when moving to Vue 3 and have been amazed. It is very early in development and there are plenty of rough edges, but it has been a breath of fresh air not waiting for anything to update. It is so fast we have found ourselves using devtools in browser less because changing styles is just as fast in code. We felt confident using the tool because although it is early in its development, the production build is still provided by Rollup which is a mature tool. We also felt optimistic that as good as it is right now, it will only continue to get better, as it is being worked on very actively. So far we are really happy with the choice.

55.8k views55.8k
Comments
António
António

Apr 13, 2021

Decided

Very simple to use and a great way to optimize repetitive tasks, like optimize PNG images, convert to WebP, create sprite images with CSS.

I didn't choose Grunt because of the fact it uses files and Gulp uses memory, making it faster for my use case since I need to work with 3000+ small images. And the fact Gulp has 32k+ stars on GitHub.

38.5k views38.5k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

gulp
gulp
Webpack
Webpack

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

By preferring code over configuration, gulp keeps simple things simple and makes complex tasks manageable.;By harnessing the power of node's streams you get fast builds that don't write intermediary files to disk.;gulp's strict plugin guidelines assure plugins stay simple and work the way you expect.;With a minimal API surface, you can pick up gulp in no time. Your build works just like you envision it: a series of streaming pipes.
Bundles ES Modules, CommonJS, and AMD modules (even combined); Can create a single bundle or multiple chunks that are asynchronously loaded at runtime (to reduce initial loading time); Dependencies are resolved during compilation, reducing the runtime size; Loaders can preprocess files while compiling, e.g. TypeScript to JavaScript, Handlebars strings to compiled functions, images to Base64, etc; Highly modular plugin system to do whatever else your application requires
Statistics
GitHub Stars
33.0K
GitHub Stars
65.7K
GitHub Forks
4.2K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
Stacks
15.3K
Stacks
45.0K
Followers
9.1K
Followers
28.1K
Votes
1.7K
Votes
752
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 451
    Build speed
  • 277
    Readable
  • 244
    Code-over-configuration
  • 210
    Open source
  • 175
    Node streams
Pros
  • 309
    Most powerful bundler
  • 182
    Built-in dev server with livereload
  • 142
    Can handle all types of assets
  • 87
    Easy configuration
  • 22
    Laravel-mix
Cons
  • 15
    Hard to configure
  • 5
    No clear direction
  • 2
    SystemJS integration is quite lackluster
  • 2
    Spaghetti-Code out of the box
  • 2
    Fire and Forget mentality of Core-Developers
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to gulp, Webpack?

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Parcel

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

rollup

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Backpack

Backpack

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

Vite

Vite

It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.

Pingy CLI

Pingy CLI

Gulp and Grunt and other heavyweight build tools are great for complicated build workflows. Sometimes you want something simpler that doesn't take lots of configuration to get up and running. That's Pingy CLI.

Microbundle

Microbundle

Zero-configuration bundler for tiny modules, powered by Rollup.

System.js

System.js

It is a Universal Module Loader for JavaScript. If you've used RequireJs or a CommonJs bundler in the past, you have probably created modules.Configurable module loader enabling dynamic ES module workflows in browsers and NodeJS.

Esbuild

Esbuild

It is an extremely fast JavaScript and CSS bundler and minifier. Current build tools for the web are 10-100x slower than they could be. The main goal of this project is to bring about a new era of build tool performance, and create an easy-to-use modern bundler along the way.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana