Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Google Analytics vs Heap: What are the differences?
Introduction
Google Analytics and Heap are both popular tools used for web analytics. While they share some similarities, there are several key differences between the two.
Data Collection: Google Analytics collects data using a JavaScript tracking code snippet that needs to be placed on every page of a website. Heap, on the other hand, automatically captures all user interactions without any code implementation. This makes Heap easier to set up and less prone to human error.
Event Tracking: Google Analytics focuses on pageviews and goals, while Heap captures every user event by default. With Heap, you can gain a more granular understanding of user behavior and track specific events such as clicks, form submissions, and custom events without having to set them up individually.
Data Storage: Google Analytics stores data in their servers, allowing users to access it through their interface. Heap, on the other hand, stores all the raw data in its own database, giving users the ability to perform retroactive analysis and answer new questions as they arise.
Data Accessibility: Google Analytics provides a pre-built interface with predefined reports and dashboards that are easy to use, making it suitable for non-technical users. In contrast, Heap offers a more customizable interface that allows users to build their own analysis and reports, making it suitable for more advanced users who require more flexibility.
Data Analysis: Google Analytics offers features like funnels, segmentations, and attribution modeling, allowing users to perform more complex data analysis and gain insights into user behavior and conversion rates. Although Heap does offer similar analysis capabilities, it may require more customization and technical expertise to achieve the same level of depth.
Pricing: Google Analytics offers a free version with limited features, as well as a paid version for enterprise users. Heap, on the other hand, operates on a subscription-based model with different pricing tiers based on the volume of data collected. The cost of Heap can vary depending on the size of the organization and the amount of data being analyzed.
In summary, Google Analytics and Heap differ in terms of data collection, event tracking, data storage, data accessibility, data analysis capabilities, and pricing. These differences make each tool suitable for different types of users and organizations based on their specific needs and requirements.
We have integrated Panelbear on our Website, rather than Google Analytics, because it is way more respecting of the User's Privacy. Whilst Google Analytics gives us in-depth information on virtually everything, we don't even need that much. Panelbear keeps it simple and in addition to that, displays the data well structured in a simple and intuitive dashboard
Pros of Google Analytics
- Free1.5K
- Easy setup927
- Data visualization891
- Real-time stats698
- Comprehensive feature set406
- Goals tracking182
- Powerful funnel conversion reporting155
- Customizable reports139
- Custom events try83
- Elastic api53
- Updated regulary15
- Interactive Documentation8
- Google play4
- Walkman music video playlist3
- Industry Standard3
- Advanced ecommerce3
- Irina2
- Easy to integrate2
- Financial Management Challenges -2015h2
- Medium / Channel data split2
- Lifesaver2
Pros of Heap
- Automatically capture every user action36
- No code required23
- Free Plan21
- Real-time insights14
- Track custom events11
- Define user segments10
- Define active users7
- Redshift integration2
- Fun to use2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Google Analytics
- Confusing UX/UI11
- Super complex8
- Very hard to build out funnels6
- Poor web performance metrics4
- Very easy to confuse the user of the analytics3
- Time spent on page isn't accurate out of the box2