Integromat vs n8n: What are the differences?

Introduction

Integromat and n8n are both popular workflow automation tools that allow users to connect and automate various apps and services. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two platforms.

1. Pricing Structure: Integromat offers a pricing model based on the number of operations, meaning the number of actions performed within a scenario. On the other hand, n8n follows an open-source approach and offers a free version with limited features, while the paid version provides additional functionality and support.

2. User Interface: Integromat provides a more user-friendly and intuitive interface, allowing users to easily build and visualize workflows through a drag-and-drop interface. n8n, on the other hand, requires more technical knowledge and familiarity with workflows and JSON structures, making it more suitable for users with programming expertise.

3. Extensibility and Community Support: While both Integromat and n8n offer a wide range of supported apps and services, Integromat has a larger library of ready-made modules and integrations. Additionally, Integromat has a well-established community with active support forums and pre-built scenarios that can be readily utilized, making it easier for users to find solutions to common integration challenges.

4. On-Premises Deployment: n8n allows for self-hosting, providing users with the ability to deploy the platform on their own servers. This feature is particularly beneficial for organizations that require more control over their data and infrastructure. In contrast, Integromat is a cloud-based platform, and users do not have the option to host it on-premises.

5. Execution and Reliability: Integromat guarantees high-performance execution and reliability due to its infrastructure and optimized workflows. On the other hand, n8n's execution performance can vary depending on the environment it is deployed in, as it relies on the underlying infrastructure and resources of the hosting server.

6. Learning Curve: Integromat offers a smoother learning curve for beginners and non-technical users, as it requires minimal coding knowledge to build and automate workflows. n8n, being more technical in nature, may have a steeper learning curve for users who are not familiar with JSON, API endpoints, and workflow development concepts.

Summary: In summary, Integromat offers a more user-friendly interface, a larger library of integrations, and a cloud-based deployment option. On the other hand, n8n provides a self-hosting capability, openness through an open-source model, and more flexibility for advanced users with programming skills.