StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Jenkins vs Spinnaker

Jenkins vs Spinnaker

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
Spinnaker
Spinnaker
Stacks233
Followers358
Votes14
GitHub Stars9.6K
Forks1.2K

Jenkins vs Spinnaker: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Jenkins and Spinnaker are both popular continuous integration and delivery tools used in the software development lifecycle. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Integration with Cloud Platforms: Jenkins primarily focuses on integrating with various cloud platforms to facilitate continuous integration and delivery processes. It provides extensive plugins and integrations for cloud service providers like AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure. On the other hand, Spinnaker is specifically designed for cloud-native applications and is more tightly integrated with cloud platforms like AWS, Google Cloud Platform, and Kubernetes.

  2. Deployment Strategies: Jenkins supports a wide range of deployment strategies, including rolling updates, blue-green deployments, and canary deployments. It allows users to define their own custom deployment strategies based on their requirements. Spinnaker, on the other hand, emphasizes the use of automated deployment pipelines. It provides built-in deployment strategies like rolling red/black deployments and canary analysis, which makes it easier for teams to implement advanced deployment patterns.

  3. Pipeline Configuration and Management: Jenkins offers a more flexible approach to pipeline configuration and management. Users can define their pipeline scripts using Jenkinsfile, written in Groovy, which allows for complex, customized workflows. Spinnaker, on the other hand, follows a more declarative approach where pipelines are defined using a YAML-based configuration file. This makes it easier for teams to version control and manage pipelines as code.

  4. Multi-Cloud Support: Jenkins is often used in hybrid or multi-cloud environments, allowing users to automate workflows across different cloud providers. It provides flexibility in integrating with different tools and technologies to meet the needs of various cloud setups. Spinnaker, on the other hand, is primarily built for multi-cloud environments and offers native support for managing deployments across multiple cloud platforms, making it a preferred choice for organizations working with diverse cloud infrastructures.

  5. Community and Support: Jenkins has a large and active community with a vast number of plugins and extensions available, which makes it highly customizable and extendable. The community actively contributes to its development and provides support to users. While Spinnaker also has an active community, it is comparatively smaller when compared to Jenkins. However, it is backed by major technology companies, including Netflix and Google, which ensures continuous development and support.

  6. User Interface and Visualization: Jenkins provides a web-based user interface that allows users to view and manage jobs, pipelines, and build status. It also offers various plugins for visualizing pipeline execution using charts and graphs. On the other hand, Spinnaker provides a more comprehensive and user-friendly interface for managing application deployments. It offers a graphical dashboard that provides a visual representation of the deployment pipelines, enabling users to easily monitor and manage their application releases.

In Summary, Jenkins focuses on integrating with various cloud platforms and offers a flexible pipeline configuration approach, while Spinnaker is designed for cloud-native applications, has built-in deployment strategies, and offers native support for managing deployments across multiple cloud platforms, making it a preferred choice for multi-cloud environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Spinnaker

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

530k views530k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
Spinnaker
Spinnaker

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
9.6K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
233
Followers
50.4K
Followers
358
Votes
2.2K
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Lack of support
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
Pros
  • 14
    Mature
Cons
  • 3
    No GitOps
  • 1
    Management overhead
  • 1
    Configuration time
  • 1
    Ease of use
Integrations
No integrations available
Stackdriver
Stackdriver
Packer
Packer
Prometheus
Prometheus
Chef
Chef
Docker
Docker
Puppet Labs
Puppet Labs
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
GitHub
GitHub
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Twilio
Twilio

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Spinnaker?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Buddy

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana