Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jira

60.6K
47.9K
+ 1
1.2K
Apache Maven

2.8K
1.7K
+ 1
414
Add tool

Apache Maven vs Jira: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Maven and Jira are two widely used tools in the software development industry that serve different purposes. Maven is a build automation tool primarily used for project management and dependency management, while Jira is a project management tool that helps teams track, manage, and prioritize their work. While both tools are essential in the software development life cycle, they differ in several key aspects.

  1. Purpose: Apache Maven is primarily designed for building and managing Java-based projects. It provides a uniform way to manage project dependencies, build processes, and project documentation. On the other hand, Jira is a versatile project management tool that can be used across various industries and domains for issue tracking, project planning, and collaboration.

  2. Functionality: Maven focuses on the build process and handles tasks such as compiling source code, running tests, packaging applications, and deploying artifacts. It provides a declarative and standardized way to manage dependencies and build configurations. Conversely, Jira offers a wide range of features for project management, such as creating and assigning tasks, tracking issue status, managing workflows, and generating reports.

  3. Collaboration and Communication: While both tools support team collaboration, Jira places more emphasis on communication and collaboration features. It provides integrated task boards, commenting systems, and notifications to keep team members informed and engaged. Maven, on the other hand, is mainly focused on the building and packaging processes and provides less functionality in terms of communication and collaboration.

  4. Integration and Extensibility: Apache Maven is known for its extensive plugin ecosystem, which allows users to customize and extend its functionality according to their specific requirements. Users can create and share Maven plugins to add new capabilities or integrate with other tools. Jira also offers integration capabilities but primarily focuses on integrating with Atlassian's suite of tools like Confluence, Bitbucket, and Bamboo.

  5. Scope and Scale: Maven is typically used at the project level, where it helps manage project dependencies and build processes for a single application. Jira, on the other hand, can handle projects of varying sizes, from small teams to large enterprises. It provides scalability features like project hierarchies, permission schemes, and project roles to support complex and large-scale project management.

  6. Community and Support: Apache Maven benefits from a large and active open-source community. It has a vast repository of community-developed plugins, extensive documentation, and active forums for support and collaboration. Jira is a product of Atlassian, a well-established software company, and enjoys professional support from the company. Atlassian also provides extensive documentation, resources, and a dedicated support team for Jira users.

In Summary, Apache Maven and Jira differ in their primary purpose, functionality, collaboration features, integration capabilities, scope, and community support. While Maven focuses on build automation and project management, Jira provides comprehensive project management features with a strong emphasis on collaboration and communication.

Decisions about Jira and Apache Maven
Jakub Olan
Node.js Software Engineer · | 4 upvotes · 301.9K views

YouTrack feels much more lightweight than Jira and additionally have all of features that Jira have, of course lacks at some analytics features, but it's more powerful at permission management and agile workflow. Additionally YouTrack have awesome integration with other JetBrains products such as incoming JetBrains Space and all other IDEs such as GoLand.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Jira
Pros of Apache Maven
  • 310
    Powerful
  • 254
    Flexible
  • 149
    Easy separation of projects
  • 113
    Run in the cloud
  • 105
    Code integration
  • 57
    Easy to use
  • 52
    Run on your own
  • 39
    Great customization
  • 38
    Easy Workflow Configuration
  • 27
    REST API
  • 12
    Great Agile Management tool
  • 7
    Integrates with virtually everything
  • 6
    Confluence
  • 5
    Complicated
  • 3
    Sentry Issues Integration
  • 138
    Dependency management
  • 70
    Necessary evil
  • 60
    I’d rather code my app, not my build
  • 48
    Publishing packaged artifacts
  • 43
    Convention over configuration
  • 18
    Modularisation
  • 11
    Consistency across builds
  • 6
    Prevents overengineering using scripting
  • 4
    Runs Tests
  • 4
    Lot of cool plugins
  • 3
    Extensible
  • 2
    Hard to customize
  • 2
    Runs on Linux
  • 1
    Runs on OS X
  • 1
    Slow incremental build
  • 1
    Inconsistent buillds
  • 1
    Undeterminisc
  • 1
    Good IDE tooling

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Jira
Cons of Apache Maven
  • 8
    Rather expensive
  • 5
    Large memory requirement
  • 2
    Slow
  • 1
    Cloud or Datacenter only
  • 6
    Complex
  • 1
    Inconsistent buillds
  • 0
    Not many plugin-alternatives

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Jira?

Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster.

What is Apache Maven?

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Jira?
What companies use Apache Maven?
See which teams inside your own company are using Jira or Apache Maven.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Jira?
What tools integrate with Apache Maven?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to Jira and Apache Maven?
Trello
Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.
Asana
Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.
Confluence
Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.
Redmine
Redmine is a flexible project management web application. Written using the Ruby on Rails framework, it is cross-platform and cross-database.
Bugzilla
Bugzilla is a "Defect Tracking System" or "Bug-Tracking System". Defect Tracking Systems allow individual or groups of developers to keep track of outstanding bugs in their product effectively. Most commercial defect-tracking software vendors charge enormous licensing fees. Despite being "free", Bugzilla has many features its expensive counterparts lack.
See all alternatives