Apache Maven vs Jira

Overview

Jira

Stacks62.5K

Followers49.5K

Votes1.2K

Apache Maven

Stacks3.4K

Followers1.7K

Votes414

GitHub Stars4.8K

Forks2.8K

Apache Maven vs Jira: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Maven and Jira are two widely used tools in the software development industry that serve different purposes. Maven is a build automation tool primarily used for project management and dependency management, while Jira is a project management tool that helps teams track, manage, and prioritize their work. While both tools are essential in the software development life cycle, they differ in several key aspects.

Purpose: Apache Maven is primarily designed for building and managing Java-based projects. It provides a uniform way to manage project dependencies, build processes, and project documentation. On the other hand, Jira is a versatile project management tool that can be used across various industries and domains for issue tracking, project planning, and collaboration.
Functionality: Maven focuses on the build process and handles tasks such as compiling source code, running tests, packaging applications, and deploying artifacts. It provides a declarative and standardized way to manage dependencies and build configurations. Conversely, Jira offers a wide range of features for project management, such as creating and assigning tasks, tracking issue status, managing workflows, and generating reports.
Collaboration and Communication: While both tools support team collaboration, Jira places more emphasis on communication and collaboration features. It provides integrated task boards, commenting systems, and notifications to keep team members informed and engaged. Maven, on the other hand, is mainly focused on the building and packaging processes and provides less functionality in terms of communication and collaboration.
Integration and Extensibility: Apache Maven is known for its extensive plugin ecosystem, which allows users to customize and extend its functionality according to their specific requirements. Users can create and share Maven plugins to add new capabilities or integrate with other tools. Jira also offers integration capabilities but primarily focuses on integrating with Atlassian's suite of tools like Confluence, Bitbucket, and Bamboo.
Scope and Scale: Maven is typically used at the project level, where it helps manage project dependencies and build processes for a single application. Jira, on the other hand, can handle projects of varying sizes, from small teams to large enterprises. It provides scalability features like project hierarchies, permission schemes, and project roles to support complex and large-scale project management.
Community and Support: Apache Maven benefits from a large and active open-source community. It has a vast repository of community-developed plugins, extensive documentation, and active forums for support and collaboration. Jira is a product of Atlassian, a well-established software company, and enjoys professional support from the company. Atlassian also provides extensive documentation, resources, and a dedicated support team for Jira users.

In Summary, Apache Maven and Jira differ in their primary purpose, functionality, collaboration features, integration capabilities, scope, and community support. While Maven focuses on build automation and project management, Jira provides comprehensive project management features with a strong emphasis on collaboration and communication.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jira, Apache Maven

Jakub

Node.js Software Engineer at Araclx

Mar 6, 2020

Decidedon

YouTrack

Jira

JetBrains Space

YouTrack feels much more lightweight than Jira and additionally have all of features that Jira have, of course lacks at some analytics features, but it's more powerful at permission management and agile workflow. Additionally YouTrack have awesome integration with other JetBrains products such as incoming JetBrains Space and all other IDEs such as GoLand.

329k views329k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jira	Apache Maven
Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster.	Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.
Create user stories and issues, plan sprints, and distribute tasks across your software team; Prioritize and discuss your team’s work in full context with complete visibility; Ship with confidence and sanity knowing the information you have is always up-to-date; Improve team performance based on real-time, visual data that your team can put to use	Simple project setup that follows best practices - get a new project or module started in seconds;Consistent usage across all projects means no ramp up time for new developers coming onto a project;Superior dependency management including automatic updating, dependency closures (also known as transitive dependencies);Able to easily work with multiple projects at the same time;A large and growing repository of libraries and metadata to use out of the box, and arrangements in place with the largest Open Source projects for real-time availability of their latest releases;Extensible, with the ability to easily write plugins in Java or scripting languages;Instant access to new features with little or no extra configuration;Ant tasks for dependency management and deployment outside of Maven
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 4.8K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.8K
Stacks 62.5K	Stacks 3.4K
Followers 49.5K	Followers 1.7K
Votes 1.2K	Votes 414
Pros & Cons
Pros 310 Powerful 254 Flexible 149 Easy separation of projects 113 Run in the cloud 105 Code integration Cons 8 Rather expensive 5 Large memory requirement 2 Slow 1 Cloud or Datacenter only	Pros 138 Dependency management 70 Necessary evil 60 I’d rather code my app, not my build 48 Publishing packaged artifacts 43 Convention over configuration Cons 6 Complex 1 Inconsistent buillds 0 Not many plugin-alternatives
Integrations
Acunote Pivotal Tracker Bugsnag SnapEngage HipChat New Relic Zendesk Zopim UserVoice Balsamiq	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Jira, Apache Maven?

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Pants

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

Bugify

Bugify offers a simple way of managing issues for your projects.

JitPack

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

SBT

It is similar to Java's Maven and Ant. Its main features are: Native support for compiling Scala code and integrating with many Scala test frameworks.

Buck

Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

ZenTao

You can effortlessly stay on top of your product development, create and delegate tasks, test your software, customize, store and secure your documents and more.

Apache Ant

Ant is a Java-based build tool. In theory, it is kind of like Make, without Make's wrinkles and with the full portability of pure Java code.

Bugzilla

Bugzilla is a "Defect Tracking System" or "Bug-Tracking System". Defect Tracking Systems allow individual or groups of developers to keep track of outstanding bugs in their product effectively. Most commercial defect-tracking software vendors charge enormous licensing fees. Despite being "free", Bugzilla has many features its expensive counterparts lack.

Related Comparisons

Apache Maven vs Jira: What are the differences?

Introduction

Purpose: Apache Maven is primarily designed for building and managing Java-based projects. It provides a uniform way to manage project dependencies, build processes, and project documentation. On the other hand, Jira is a versatile project management tool that can be used across various industries and domains for issue tracking, project planning, and collaboration.
Functionality: Maven focuses on the build process and handles tasks such as compiling source code, running tests, packaging applications, and deploying artifacts. It provides a declarative and standardized way to manage dependencies and build configurations. Conversely, Jira offers a wide range of features for project management, such as creating and assigning tasks, tracking issue status, managing workflows, and generating reports.
Collaboration and Communication: While both tools support team collaboration, Jira places more emphasis on communication and collaboration features. It provides integrated task boards, commenting systems, and notifications to keep team members informed and engaged. Maven, on the other hand, is mainly focused on the building and packaging processes and provides less functionality in terms of communication and collaboration.
Integration and Extensibility: Apache Maven is known for its extensive plugin ecosystem, which allows users to customize and extend its functionality according to their specific requirements. Users can create and share Maven plugins to add new capabilities or integrate with other tools. Jira also offers integration capabilities but primarily focuses on integrating with Atlassian's suite of tools like Confluence, Bitbucket, and Bamboo.
Scope and Scale: Maven is typically used at the project level, where it helps manage project dependencies and build processes for a single application. Jira, on the other hand, can handle projects of varying sizes, from small teams to large enterprises. It provides scalability features like project hierarchies, permission schemes, and project roles to support complex and large-scale project management.
Community and Support: Apache Maven benefits from a large and active open-source community. It has a vast repository of community-developed plugins, extensive documentation, and active forums for support and collaboration. Jira is a product of Atlassian, a well-established software company, and enjoys professional support from the company. Atlassian also provides extensive documentation, resources, and a dedicated support team for Jira users.

Apache Maven vs Jira

Overview

Apache Maven vs Jira: What are the differences?