Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Karma vs Rainforest QA: What are the differences?
Karma: Spectacular Test Runner for JavaScript. Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like; Rainforest QA: Front-end QA as a service. Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.
Karma and Rainforest QA can be primarily classified as "Browser Testing" tools.
Some of the features offered by Karma are:
- Test on Real Devices
- Remote Control
- Testing Framework Agnostic
On the other hand, Rainforest QA provides the following key features:
- Infinitely Scalable, On-Demand QA Team
- Cross Browser Testing
- Regression, Functional, and Exploratory Testing
"Test Runner" is the primary reason why developers consider Karma over the competitors, whereas "Cross-browser testing" was stated as the key factor in picking Rainforest QA.
Karma is an open source tool with 10.7K GitHub stars and 1.61K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Karma's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of Karma
- Test Runner61
- Open source35
- Continuous Integration27
- Great for running tests22
- Test on Real Devices18
- Backed by google11
- Easy Debugging5
- Remote Control2
Pros of Rainforest QA
- Cross-browser testing13
- Powerful API7
- QA7
- Super-simple test creation7
- Easy way to get real front-end smoke tests6
- Simple5
- CI Integration5
- Manual regression testing results in 30 mins3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Karma
- Slow, because tests are run in a real browser1
- Requires the use of hacks to find tests dynamically1