Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Kubernetes

59.8K
51.7K
+ 1
681
Puppet Labs

1.1K
792
+ 1
227
Add tool

Kubernetes vs Puppet Labs: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Kubernetes and Puppet Labs. Both Kubernetes and Puppet Labs are widely used in the world of DevOps and infrastructure management, but they serve different purposes and have distinct features.

  1. Scalability: Kubernetes is a container orchestration platform that focuses on managing and scaling containerized applications. It provides features like automated deployments, scaling, and load balancing. On the other hand, Puppet Labs is an infrastructure automation tool that focuses on managing the configuration of servers and applications. It helps in maintaining the desired state of the infrastructure, but it does not have the built-in scalability features that Kubernetes offers.

  2. Infrastructure Management: Kubernetes primarily deals with managing containers and containerized applications. It provides features like pod scheduling, service discovery, and container networking. Puppet Labs, on the other hand, helps in managing the infrastructure by configuring servers, installing applications, and maintaining the desired configuration state of the entire infrastructure.

  3. Declarative vs Imperative: Kubernetes follows a declarative approach where you define the desired state of your application or infrastructure, and Kubernetes takes care of maintaining that state. Puppet Labs, on the other hand, follows an imperative approach where you define the steps to configure and manage the infrastructure, and Puppet executes those steps to achieve the desired state.

  4. Community Ecosystem: Kubernetes has a larger and more vibrant community ecosystem compared to Puppet Labs. Being an open-source project developed by Google, Kubernetes has gained popularity and has a wide range of plugins, extensions, and community support. Puppet Labs also has an active community, but it is relatively smaller compared to Kubernetes.

  5. Application-specific vs Infrastructure-specific: Kubernetes primarily focuses on managing applications and their deployment, whereas Puppet Labs focuses on managing the infrastructure as a whole. Kubernetes provides features like service discovery, auto-scaling, and load balancing specifically for containerized applications, while Puppet Labs provides a comprehensive configuration management solution for servers, applications, and networks.

  6. Target Audience: Kubernetes is mainly targeted at developers, system administrators, and DevOps engineers who are involved in managing and scaling containerized applications. Puppet Labs, on the other hand, targets system administrators and infrastructure engineers who are responsible for managing the overall infrastructure configuration and maintaining the desired state.

In summary, Kubernetes is a container orchestration platform that focuses on managing containerized applications and provides scalability features, while Puppet Labs is an infrastructure automation tool that focuses on managing the configuration of servers and applications. The key differences include scalability, infrastructure management, declarative vs imperative approach, community ecosystem, application-specific vs infrastructure-specific focus, and target audience.

Advice on Kubernetes and Puppet Labs
Needs advice
on
AnsibleAnsibleChefChef
and
Puppet LabsPuppet Labs

I'm just getting started using Vagrant to help automate setting up local VMs to set up a Kubernetes cluster (development and experimentation only). (Yes, I do know about minikube)

I'm looking for a tool to help install software packages, setup users, etc..., on these VMs. I'm also fairly new to Ansible, Chef, and Puppet. What's a good one to start with to learn? I might decide to try all 3 at some point for my own curiosity.

The most important factors for me are simplicity, ease of use, shortest learning curve.

See more
Replies (2)
Recommends
on
AnsibleAnsible

I have been working with Puppet and Ansible. The reason why I prefer ansible is the distribution of it. Ansible is more lightweight and therefore more popular. This leads to situations, where you can get fully packaged applications for ansible (e.g. confluent) supported by the vendor, but only incomplete packages for Puppet.

The only advantage I would see with Puppet if someone wants to use Foreman. This is still better supported with Puppet.

See more
Gabriel Pa
Recommends
on
KubernetesKubernetes
at

If you are just starting out, might as well learn Kubernetes There's a lot of tools that come with Kube that make it easier to use and most importantly: you become cloud-agnostic. We use Ansible because it's a lot simpler than Chef or Puppet and if you use Docker Compose for your deployments you can re-use them with Kubernetes later when you migrate

See more
Decisions about Kubernetes and Puppet Labs
Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 11.1M views

Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

  • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
  • Respectively Git as revision control system
  • SourceTree as Git GUI
  • Visual Studio Code as IDE
  • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
  • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
  • SonarQube as quality gate
  • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
  • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
  • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
  • Heroku for deploying in test environments
  • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
  • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
  • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
  • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
  • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

  • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
  • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
  • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
  • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
  • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
  • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Kubernetes
Pros of Puppet Labs
  • 166
    Leading docker container management solution
  • 129
    Simple and powerful
  • 107
    Open source
  • 76
    Backed by google
  • 58
    The right abstractions
  • 25
    Scale services
  • 20
    Replication controller
  • 11
    Permission managment
  • 9
    Supports autoscaling
  • 8
    Simple
  • 8
    Cheap
  • 6
    Self-healing
  • 5
    Open, powerful, stable
  • 5
    Reliable
  • 5
    No cloud platform lock-in
  • 5
    Promotes modern/good infrascture practice
  • 4
    Scalable
  • 4
    Quick cloud setup
  • 3
    Custom and extensibility
  • 3
    Captain of Container Ship
  • 3
    Cloud Agnostic
  • 3
    Backed by Red Hat
  • 3
    Runs on azure
  • 3
    A self healing environment with rich metadata
  • 2
    Everything of CaaS
  • 2
    Gke
  • 2
    Golang
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Expandable
  • 2
    Sfg
  • 52
    Devops
  • 44
    Automate it
  • 26
    Reusable components
  • 21
    Dynamic and idempotent server configuration
  • 18
    Great community
  • 12
    Very scalable
  • 12
    Cloud management
  • 10
    Easy to maintain
  • 9
    Free tier
  • 6
    Works with Amazon EC2
  • 4
    Declarative
  • 4
    Ruby
  • 3
    Works with Azure
  • 3
    Works with OpenStack
  • 2
    Nginx
  • 1
    Ease of use

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Kubernetes
Cons of Puppet Labs
  • 16
    Steep learning curve
  • 15
    Poor workflow for development
  • 8
    Orchestrates only infrastructure
  • 4
    High resource requirements for on-prem clusters
  • 2
    Too heavy for simple systems
  • 1
    Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)
  • 1
    More moving parts to secure
  • 1
    Additional Technology Overhead
  • 3
    Steep learning curve
  • 1
    Customs types idempotence

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Kubernetes?

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

What is Puppet Labs?

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Kubernetes?
What companies use Puppet Labs?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Kubernetes?
What tools integrate with Puppet Labs?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

Kubernetesetcd+2
3
1191
Dec 8 2020 at 5:50PM

DigitalOcean

GitHubMySQLPostgreSQL+11
3
2438
PythonDockerKubernetes+7
5
1153
May 21 2020 at 12:02AM

Rancher Labs

KubernetesAmazon EC2Grafana+12
6
1530
Apr 16 2020 at 5:34AM

Rancher Labs

KubernetesRancher+2
3
970
What are some alternatives to Kubernetes and Puppet Labs?
Docker Swarm
Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.
Nomad
Nomad is a cluster manager, designed for both long lived services and short lived batch processing workloads. Developers use a declarative job specification to submit work, and Nomad ensures constraints are satisfied and resource utilization is optimized by efficient task packing. Nomad supports all major operating systems and virtualized, containerized, or standalone applications.
OpenStack
OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.
Rancher
Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.
Docker Compose
With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.
See all alternatives