Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Kubernetes vs Puppet Labs: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Kubernetes and Puppet Labs. Both Kubernetes and Puppet Labs are widely used in the world of DevOps and infrastructure management, but they serve different purposes and have distinct features.
Scalability: Kubernetes is a container orchestration platform that focuses on managing and scaling containerized applications. It provides features like automated deployments, scaling, and load balancing. On the other hand, Puppet Labs is an infrastructure automation tool that focuses on managing the configuration of servers and applications. It helps in maintaining the desired state of the infrastructure, but it does not have the built-in scalability features that Kubernetes offers.
Infrastructure Management: Kubernetes primarily deals with managing containers and containerized applications. It provides features like pod scheduling, service discovery, and container networking. Puppet Labs, on the other hand, helps in managing the infrastructure by configuring servers, installing applications, and maintaining the desired configuration state of the entire infrastructure.
Declarative vs Imperative: Kubernetes follows a declarative approach where you define the desired state of your application or infrastructure, and Kubernetes takes care of maintaining that state. Puppet Labs, on the other hand, follows an imperative approach where you define the steps to configure and manage the infrastructure, and Puppet executes those steps to achieve the desired state.
Community Ecosystem: Kubernetes has a larger and more vibrant community ecosystem compared to Puppet Labs. Being an open-source project developed by Google, Kubernetes has gained popularity and has a wide range of plugins, extensions, and community support. Puppet Labs also has an active community, but it is relatively smaller compared to Kubernetes.
Application-specific vs Infrastructure-specific: Kubernetes primarily focuses on managing applications and their deployment, whereas Puppet Labs focuses on managing the infrastructure as a whole. Kubernetes provides features like service discovery, auto-scaling, and load balancing specifically for containerized applications, while Puppet Labs provides a comprehensive configuration management solution for servers, applications, and networks.
Target Audience: Kubernetes is mainly targeted at developers, system administrators, and DevOps engineers who are involved in managing and scaling containerized applications. Puppet Labs, on the other hand, targets system administrators and infrastructure engineers who are responsible for managing the overall infrastructure configuration and maintaining the desired state.
In summary, Kubernetes is a container orchestration platform that focuses on managing containerized applications and provides scalability features, while Puppet Labs is an infrastructure automation tool that focuses on managing the configuration of servers and applications. The key differences include scalability, infrastructure management, declarative vs imperative approach, community ecosystem, application-specific vs infrastructure-specific focus, and target audience.
I'm just getting started using Vagrant to help automate setting up local VMs to set up a Kubernetes cluster (development and experimentation only). (Yes, I do know about minikube)
I'm looking for a tool to help install software packages, setup users, etc..., on these VMs. I'm also fairly new to Ansible, Chef, and Puppet. What's a good one to start with to learn? I might decide to try all 3 at some point for my own curiosity.
The most important factors for me are simplicity, ease of use, shortest learning curve.
I have been working with Puppet and Ansible. The reason why I prefer ansible is the distribution of it. Ansible is more lightweight and therefore more popular. This leads to situations, where you can get fully packaged applications for ansible (e.g. confluent) supported by the vendor, but only incomplete packages for Puppet.
The only advantage I would see with Puppet if someone wants to use Foreman. This is still better supported with Puppet.
If you are just starting out, might as well learn Kubernetes There's a lot of tools that come with Kube that make it easier to use and most importantly: you become cloud-agnostic. We use Ansible because it's a lot simpler than Chef or Puppet and if you use Docker Compose for your deployments you can re-use them with Kubernetes later when you migrate
Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:
- GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
- Respectively Git as revision control system
- SourceTree as Git GUI
- Visual Studio Code as IDE
- CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
- Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
- SonarQube as quality gate
- Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
- VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
- Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
- Heroku for deploying in test environments
- nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
- SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
- Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
- PostgreSQL as preferred database system
- Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)
The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:
- Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
- Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
- Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
- Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
- Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
- Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
Pros of Kubernetes
- Leading docker container management solution166
- Simple and powerful129
- Open source107
- Backed by google76
- The right abstractions58
- Scale services25
- Replication controller20
- Permission managment11
- Supports autoscaling9
- Simple8
- Cheap8
- Self-healing6
- Open, powerful, stable5
- Reliable5
- No cloud platform lock-in5
- Promotes modern/good infrascture practice5
- Scalable4
- Quick cloud setup4
- Custom and extensibility3
- Captain of Container Ship3
- Cloud Agnostic3
- Backed by Red Hat3
- Runs on azure3
- A self healing environment with rich metadata3
- Everything of CaaS2
- Gke2
- Golang2
- Easy setup2
- Expandable2
- Sfg2
Pros of Puppet Labs
- Devops52
- Automate it44
- Reusable components26
- Dynamic and idempotent server configuration21
- Great community18
- Very scalable12
- Cloud management12
- Easy to maintain10
- Free tier9
- Works with Amazon EC26
- Declarative4
- Ruby4
- Works with Azure3
- Works with OpenStack3
- Nginx2
- Ease of use1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Kubernetes
- Steep learning curve16
- Poor workflow for development15
- Orchestrates only infrastructure8
- High resource requirements for on-prem clusters4
- Too heavy for simple systems2
- Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)1
- More moving parts to secure1
- Additional Technology Overhead1
Cons of Puppet Labs
- Steep learning curve3
- Customs types idempotence1