1. Packaging and Configuration:

   • Lando uses recipes to define application configurations which are easy to share and reuse, while Vagrant relies on manually configuring the Vagrantfile.

2. Resource Efficiency:

   • Lando is known for its lightweight resource usage compared to Vagrant, making it faster to spin up development environments.

3. Built-in Services:

   • Lando provides built-in services such as databases, caching systems, and search engines, while Vagrant requires additional provisioning tools to set up these services.

4. Ease of Use:

   • Lando is praised for its user-friendly and intuitive interface, simplifying the setup and management of development environments, whereas Vagrant may have a steeper learning curve for beginners.

5. Integrations:

   • Lando seamlessly integrates with popular CMS platforms like Drupal and WordPress, providing specific configurations for these systems, which can be more challenging to set up in Vagrant.

6. Containerization Approach:

   • Lando leverages Docker containers under the hood, allowing for greater isolation and consistency in development environments, whereas Vagrant uses virtual machines, which might be heavier and slower in comparison.

In Summary, Lando and Vagrant differ in their packaging and configuration methods, resource efficiency, built-in services, ease of use, integrations, and containerization approach.