MaaS vs OpenNebula: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between MaaS and OpenNebula

Maas (Metal as a Service) focuses on managing physical servers and providing provisioning services, while OpenNebula is a cloud management platform that primarily targets virtualized resources.

1. **Deployment Scope**: MaaS is more focused on managing physical hardware, including provisioning and monitoring of servers, while OpenNebula is designed for managing virtualized resources such as VMs, containers, and virtual networks.
2. **Use Cases**: MaaS is commonly used in data centers where physical servers need efficient management, whereas OpenNebula is preferred in cloud environments where virtual resources need orchestration and automation.
3. **Resource Management**: MaaS primarily deals with hardware resource allocation and maintenance, while OpenNebula provides advanced resource scheduling and monitoring capabilities for virtualized environments.
4. **Scaling Capabilities**: MaaS is limited in scaling capabilities as it deals with physical servers, whereas OpenNebula offers scalability by allowing easy management of virtual resources and can scale horizontally to accommodate high workloads.
5. **Integration with Cloud Services**: OpenNebula has better integration with cloud services, offering support for various hypervisors and public cloud providers, whereas MaaS mainly focuses on on-premise infrastructure management.
6. **Networking Support**: OpenNebula provides advanced networking features and integration with SDN controllers, while MaaS lacks in-depth networking capabilities and focuses more on server provisioning and monitoring.

In Summary, MaaS focuses on managing physical servers, while OpenNebula is a cloud management platform targeting virtualized resources with advanced networking and scalability capabilities.