Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Material-UI vs Quasar Framework: What are the differences?
Introduction:
In this article, we will explore the key differences between Material-UI and Quasar Framework, two popular front-end development frameworks. Both frameworks offer a range of features and components to enhance the design and functionality of websites. However, they differ in several aspects that developers should consider when choosing the right framework for their projects.
1. Design Philosophy:
Material-UI follows the Material Design principles, which provide a clean and modern visual language with a focus on simplicity and usability. On the other hand, Quasar Framework offers a flexible and customizable design system inspired by both Material Design and iOS design guidelines, giving developers more options for styling their applications.
2. Component Library:
Material-UI provides a comprehensive set of pre-built React components, such as buttons, forms, navigation menus, and more. These components are highly customizable and can be easily integrated into React applications. Quasar Framework, on the other hand, offers a wider variety of components for multiple frameworks, including Vue.js, React, and Angular, making it suitable for developers working with different platforms.
3. Integration with Frameworks:
Material-UI is specifically designed for React applications and has extensive support for React features and functionalities. It seamlessly integrates with React's state management infrastructure, allowing developers to build complex applications easily. Quasar Framework, on the other hand, is built to support multiple frameworks, providing a more versatile solution for developers who work with different frameworks.
4. Theming and Styling:
Material-UI provides a powerful theming system that allows developers to easily customize the styles and colors of their applications. It also offers a range of pre-defined themes and color palettes to choose from. Quasar Framework, on the other hand, offers a more flexible theming system that allows developers to create their own custom themes or use pre-built ones. It also provides a set of utility classes to quickly style components.
5. Supported Platforms:
Material-UI is primarily focused on web applications and provides components and features that are optimized for web development. Quasar Framework, on the other hand, supports multiple platforms, including web, mobile, and desktop applications. It provides tools and components that are specifically designed for each platform, making it a more versatile choice for developers working on different projects.
6. Community and Support:
Material-UI has a large and active community of developers, providing a wealth of resources, documentation, and community-driven projects. It is well-established and widely used in the React ecosystem, making it easier to find support and solutions to common issues. Quasar Framework, although less popular, also has an active community, and its documentation and support resources are growing rapidly.
In summary, Material-UI and Quasar Framework differ in their design philosophy, component library, integration with frameworks, theming and styling options, supported platforms, and community and support. Developers should consider these differences to choose the framework that best suits their project requirements and development preferences.
Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.
https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085
Pros of Material-UI
- React141
- Material Design82
- Ui components60
- CSS framework30
- Component26
- Looks great15
- Responsive13
- Good documentation12
- LESS9
- Ui component8
- Open source7
- Flexible6
- Code examples6
- JSS5
- Supports old browsers out of the box3
- Interface3
- Angular3
- Very accessible3
- Fun3
- Typescript support2
- # of components2
- Designed for Server Side Rendering2
- Support for multiple styling systems1
- Accessibility1
- Easy to work with1
- Css1
Pros of Quasar Framework
- Excellent documentation59
- Deploy one codebase to web, desktop, mobile, and more44
- Lots of UI components40
- Extensive collection of components39
- Being able to bundle for almost all platform is awesome33
- Quasar App Extensions27
- Excelent performance27
- Great community25
- Open Source20
- Attention to Security16
- Material Design15
- It is easy because of vue11
- 1 Cross Platform Android, IOS and Desktop10
- Cross Platform Andriod, IOS and Desktop10
- SSR8
- Vue 3 Support7
- Active and helpful community6
- Treeshaking4
- Simple to use3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Material-UI
- Hard to learn. Bad documentation36
- Hard to customize29
- Hard to understand Docs22
- Bad performance9
- Extra library needed for date/time pickers7
- For editable table component need to use material-table7
- Typescript Support2
- # of components1
Cons of Quasar Framework
- Stackoverflow 1.5k Questions4