Papertrail vs Serilog

Overview

Papertrail

Stacks605

Followers378

Votes273

Serilog

Stacks2.1K

Followers107

Votes1

GitHub Stars7.8K

Forks840

Papertrail vs Serilog: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Cost: One key difference between Papertrail and Serilog is the cost structure. Papertrail charges based on data volume ingested, while Serilog is an open-source library and does not have any direct costs associated with its use.
Deployment: When it comes to deployment, Papertrail is a cloud-based logging service that requires no installation, making it quick and easy to set up. On the other hand, Serilog is a logging library for .NET applications that needs to be integrated within the application itself, requiring more configuration and setup.
Logging Features: Papertrail offers features such as real-time tail, searching, and alerting capabilities, making it a robust solution for log management. Serilog, on the other hand, provides structured logging to improve log readability and supports various sinks for log output.
Customization: Papertrail provides a user-friendly interface for searching and analyzing logs but has limited customization options. Serilog allows developers to create custom loggers and enrich log events with additional properties, giving more control and flexibility over logging behavior.
Performance: Papertrail is a fully managed service with scalable infrastructure, ensuring high performance and reliability for log management. Serilog, being a library integrated within the application, may require more manual optimization to achieve optimal performance in different scenarios.
Ecosystem: Another difference lies in the ecosystem surrounding Papertrail and Serilog. Papertrail integrates with various applications and services, offering a wide range of integrations for seamless log management. Serilog, being a .NET library, is well-suited for .NET applications and has a strong community support within the .NET ecosystem.

In Summary, the key differences between Papertrail and Serilog lie in their cost structures, deployment methods, logging features, customization options, performance considerations, and ecosystem support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Papertrail	Serilog
Papertrail helps detect, resolve, and avoid infrastructure problems using log messages. Papertrail's practicality comes from our own experience as sysadmins, developers, and entrepreneurs.	It provides diagnostic logging to files, the console, and elsewhere. It is easy to set up, has a clean API, and is portable between recent .NET platforms.
Intuitive Web-based log viewer;Powerful command-line tools;Long-term archive (S3);REST API;Team-wide groups and searches;Automated export for tables and charts;Search alerts;Easy SQL analytics (Hadoop);Unlimited systems and users;Encrypted logging	Structured logging; .NET logger
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 7.8K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 840
Stacks 605	Stacks 2.1K
Followers 378	Followers 107
Votes 273	Votes 1
Pros & Cons
Pros 85 Log search 43 Integrates with Heroku 43 Easy log aggregation across multiple machines 37 Simple interface 26 Backup to S3 Cons 2 Expensive 1 External Network Goes Down You Wont Be Logging	Pros 1 It's a logging library Cons 1 They are two different things 1 You can't compare this to seq
Integrations
Slack Heroku PagerDuty Amazon S3 AWS Elastic Beanstalk Amazon RDS OpsGenie New Relic Librato HipChat	.NET C++ LogRocket ASP.NET

What are some alternatives to Papertrail, Serilog?

Logmatic

Get a clear overview of what is happening across your distributed environments, and spot the needle in the haystack in no time. Build dynamic analyses and identify improvements for your software, your user experience and your business.

Loggly

It is a SaaS solution to manage your log data. There is nothing to install and updates are automatically applied to your Loggly subdomain.

Logentries

Logentries makes machine-generated log data easily accessible to IT operations, development, and business analysis teams of all sizes. With the broadest platform support and an open API, Logentries brings the value of log-level data to any system, to any team member, and to a community of more than 25,000 worldwide users.

Logstash

Logstash is a tool for managing events and logs. You can use it to collect logs, parse them, and store them for later use (like, for searching). If you store them in Elasticsearch, you can view and analyze them with Kibana.

Graylog

Centralize and aggregate all your log files for 100% visibility. Use our powerful query language to search through terabytes of log data to discover and analyze important information.

Sematext

Sematext pulls together performance monitoring, logs, user experience and synthetic monitoring that tools organizations need to troubleshoot performance issues faster.

Fluentd

Fluentd collects events from various data sources and writes them to files, RDBMS, NoSQL, IaaS, SaaS, Hadoop and so on. Fluentd helps you unify your logging infrastructure.

ELK

It is the acronym for three open source projects: Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana. Elasticsearch is a search and analytics engine. Logstash is a server‑side data processing pipeline that ingests data from multiple sources simultaneously, transforms it, and then sends it to a "stash" like Elasticsearch. Kibana lets users visualize data with charts and graphs in Elasticsearch.

Sumo Logic

Cloud-based machine data analytics platform that enables companies to proactively identify availability and performance issues in their infrastructure, improve their security posture and enhance application rollouts. Companies using Sumo Logic reduce their mean-time-to-resolution by 50% and can save hundreds of thousands of dollars, annually. Customers include Netflix, Medallia, Orange, and GoGo Inflight.

Splunk

It provides the leading platform for Operational Intelligence. Customers use it to search, monitor, analyze and visualize machine data.

Related Comparisons

Papertrail vs Serilog: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Cost: One key difference between Papertrail and Serilog is the cost structure. Papertrail charges based on data volume ingested, while Serilog is an open-source library and does not have any direct costs associated with its use.
Deployment: When it comes to deployment, Papertrail is a cloud-based logging service that requires no installation, making it quick and easy to set up. On the other hand, Serilog is a logging library for .NET applications that needs to be integrated within the application itself, requiring more configuration and setup.
Logging Features: Papertrail offers features such as real-time tail, searching, and alerting capabilities, making it a robust solution for log management. Serilog, on the other hand, provides structured logging to improve log readability and supports various sinks for log output.
Customization: Papertrail provides a user-friendly interface for searching and analyzing logs but has limited customization options. Serilog allows developers to create custom loggers and enrich log events with additional properties, giving more control and flexibility over logging behavior.
Performance: Papertrail is a fully managed service with scalable infrastructure, ensuring high performance and reliability for log management. Serilog, being a library integrated within the application, may require more manual optimization to achieve optimal performance in different scenarios.
Ecosystem: Another difference lies in the ecosystem surrounding Papertrail and Serilog. Papertrail integrates with various applications and services, offering a wide range of integrations for seamless log management. Serilog, being a .NET library, is well-suited for .NET applications and has a strong community support within the .NET ecosystem.

Papertrail vs Serilog

Overview