Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
PullReview vs SonarQube: What are the differences?
Developers describe PullReview as "Automated code review for Ruby and Rails developers". PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code. On the other hand, SonarQube is detailed as "Continuous Code Quality". SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.
PullReview and SonarQube belong to "Code Review" category of the tech stack.
"Very detailed review of my code" is the top reason why over 17 developers like PullReview, while over 9 developers mention "Tracks code complexity and smell trends" as the leading cause for choosing SonarQube.
SonarQube is an open source tool with 3.78K GitHub stars and 1.06K GitHub forks. Here's a link to SonarQube's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of PullReview
- Very detailed review of my code18
- Useful10
- Github integration9
- Feels like a teacher is helping me7
- Up to date inspections5
- Ease of setup5
- Free for OSS5
- Fix the problems before they reach the master branch4
- Just awesome3
- Rails only2
- Pullreview just made our life so much easier1
- Relevant SO discussions1
Pros of SonarQube
- Tracks code complexity and smell trends26
- IDE Integration16
- Complete code Review9
- Difficult to deploy2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of PullReview
Cons of SonarQube
- Sales process is long and unfriendly7
- Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful7
- Does not integrate with Snyk1