Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Pusher

601
1.4K
+ 1
234
SignalR

488
1.2K
+ 1
146
Socket.IO

12.9K
10.7K
+ 1
785

Pusher vs SignalR vs Socket.IO: What are the differences?

Introduction:

The following Markdown code provides a comparison of the key differences between Pusher, SignalR, and Socket.IO, which are real-time communication libraries commonly used in web development.

  1. Scalability and Performance:

    • Pusher provides a highly scalable infrastructure that allows for seamless real-time communication between clients, making it suitable for large-scale applications.
    • SignalR also offers good scalability and performance, allowing for efficient communication between clients, but it may require additional configuration to handle a high number of simultaneous connections.
    • Socket.IO is known for its ability to handle a massive number of concurrent connections, making it highly scalable and performant.
  2. Supported Platforms and Languages:

    • Pusher provides SDKs and libraries for various platforms and languages, including JavaScript, iOS, Android, and multiple backend languages. This allows developers to easily integrate real-time functionality into their applications across different platforms.
    • SignalR is primarily focused on the Microsoft technology stack, providing libraries for .NET, ASP.NET, and .NET Core. It offers a seamless integration with these technologies, making it an ideal choice for Windows-based applications.
    • Socket.IO is language-agnostic and supports multiple platforms, including JavaScript, Node.js, and various backend languages. This flexibility allows developers to use Socket.IO with different programming languages and frameworks.
  3. Data Exchange Protocol:

    • Pusher utilizes a WebSocket-based protocol to establish a persistent connection between clients and servers. It also supports fallback mechanisms such as HTTP long polling or HTTP streaming for environments where WebSocket is not available.
    • SignalR also supports WebSocket as the primary transport protocol, but it can automatically switch to other transport mechanisms like Server-Sent Events (SSE) or long polling based on the client's capabilities.
    • Socket.IO uses a custom protocol that is designed for real-time communication. It supports WebSocket as the default transport, but it also has built-in support for alternative transport options like HTTP long polling or JSONP.
  4. Authentication and Authorization:

    • Pusher provides various mechanisms for authentication and authorization, allowing developers to implement secure access control for real-time communication. This includes private channels, presence channels, and webhooks for authorization.
    • SignalR supports different authentication modes, including ASP.NET's built-in authentication mechanisms, token-based authentication, and custom authentication options. It also provides authorization attributes for controlling access to specific Hubs or methods.
    • Socket.IO does not provide built-in authentication and authorization mechanisms. Developers need to implement their own authentication logic on top of Socket.IO for securing real-time communication.
  5. Community and Support:

    • Pusher has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources. It also offers dedicated customer support for paid plans.
    • SignalR is backed by Microsoft and has a strong community presence. It has official documentation and support resources available through Microsoft channels.
    • Socket.IO has a vibrant open-source community and extensive documentation. It benefits from being widely adopted and has numerous community-contributed resources and support.
  6. Additional Features and Ecosystem:

    • Pusher provides additional features like presence detection, private channels, webhooks, and client libraries for various platforms. It also integrates well with other services in the Pusher ecosystem, such as Channels, Beams, or ChatKit.
    • SignalR offers features like automatic reconnection, connection monitoring, and support for multiple communication patterns such as Hubs, Persistent Connections, and Streams. It also integrates seamlessly with other components of the ASP.NET ecosystem.
    • Socket.IO offers various features like automatic reconnection, room-based communication, and real-time analytics. It has integrations with other tools and libraries in the Node.js and JavaScript ecosystem.

In summary, Pusher excels in scalability and cross-platform support, SignalR is well-integrated with the Microsoft technology stack and provides seamless Windows-based application development experience, and Socket.IO is highly scalable, language-agnostic, and offers extensive flexibility for real-time communication.

Advice on Pusher, SignalR, and Socket.IO
Needs advice
on
ApolloApolloFirebaseFirebase
and
Socket.IOSocket.IO

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

See more
Replies (3)
Timothy Malstead
Junior Full Stack Developer at Freelance · | 7 upvotes · 463.4K views
Recommends
on
FirebaseFirebase

I would recommend looking hard into Firebase for this project, especially if you do not have dedicated full-stack or backend members on your team.

The real time database, as you mentioned, is a great option, but I would also look into Firestore. Similar to RTDB, it adds more functions and some cool methods as well. Also, another great thing about Firebase is you have easy access to storage and dead simple auth as well.

Node.js Express MongoDB Socket.IO and Apollo are great technologies as well, and may be the better option if you do not wish to cede as much control to third parties in your application.

Overall, I say if you wish to focus more time developing your React application instead of other parts of your stack, Firebase is a great way to do that.

See more
Recommends
on
AblyAbly

Hello Noam 👋,

I suggest taking a look at Ably, it has all the realtime features you need and the platform is designed to guarantee critical functionality at scale.

Here is an in depth comparison between Ably and Firebase

See more
Recommends
on
8base8base

Hey Noam,

I would recommend you to take a look into 8base. It has features you've requested, also relation database and GraphQL API which will help you to develop rapidly.

Thanks, Ilya

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Pusher
Pros of SignalR
Pros of Socket.IO
  • 55
    An easy way to give customers realtime features
  • 40
    Websockets
  • 34
    Simple
  • 27
    Easy to get started with
  • 25
    Free plan
  • 12
    Heroku Add-on
  • 11
    Easy and fast to configure and to understand
  • 9
    JSON
  • 6
    Happy
  • 6
    Azure Add-on
  • 5
    Support
  • 4
    Push notification
  • 32
    Supports .NET server
  • 25
    Real-time
  • 18
    Free
  • 16
    Fallback to SSE, forever frame, long polling
  • 15
    WebSockets
  • 10
    Simple
  • 9
    Open source
  • 8
    Ease of use
  • 8
    JSON
  • 5
    Cool
  • 0
    Azure
  • 219
    Real-time
  • 143
    Node.js
  • 141
    Event-based communication
  • 102
    Open source
  • 102
    WebSockets
  • 26
    Binary streaming
  • 21
    No internet dependency
  • 10
    Large community
  • 9
    Fallback to polling if WebSockets not supported
  • 6
    Push notification
  • 5
    Ease of access and setup
  • 1
    Test

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Pusher
Cons of SignalR
Cons of Socket.IO
  • 10
    Costly
  • 2
    Expertise hard to get
  • 2
    Requires jQuery
  • 1
    Weak iOS and Android support
  • 1
    Big differences between ASP.NET and Core versions
  • 12
    Bad documentation
  • 4
    Githubs that complement it are mostly deprecated
  • 3
    Doesn't work on React Native
  • 2
    Small community
  • 2
    Websocket Errors

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Pusher?

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

What is SignalR?

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

What is Socket.IO?

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Pusher?
What companies use SignalR?
What companies use Socket.IO?

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Pusher?
What tools integrate with SignalR?
What tools integrate with Socket.IO?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

GitHubGitDocker+34
29
42435
JavaScriptGitHubNode.js+26
20
4948
What are some alternatives to Pusher, SignalR, and Socket.IO?
PubNub
PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.
Firebase
Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.
Chat by Stream
Chat API and SDK. With a beautiful UI Kit, easy to use React Components and powerful API. Add Chat to any application in a matter of hours. The tech uses Go, RocksDB and Raft. By the creators of Stream, the API that powers activity feeds for more than 300 million users.
Twilio
Twilio offers developers a powerful API for phone services to make and receive phone calls, and send and receive text messages. Their product allows programmers to more easily integrate various communication methods into their software and programs.
ws
It is a simple to use, blazing fast, and thoroughly tested WebSocket client and server implementation.
See all alternatives