Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Rancher

754
1.1K
+ 1
642
Terraform

8.3K
6.3K
+ 1
294
Add tool

Rancher vs Terraform: What are the differences?

What is Rancher? Open Source Platform for Running a Private Container Service. Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

What is Terraform? Describe your complete infrastructure as code and build resources across providers. With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Rancher and Terraform are primarily classified as "Container" and "Infrastructure Build" tools respectively.

Some of the features offered by Rancher are:

  • Manage Hosts, Deploy Containers, Monitor Resources
  • User Management & Collaboration
  • Native Docker APIs & Tools

On the other hand, Terraform provides the following key features:

  • Infrastructure as Code: Infrastructure is described using a high-level configuration syntax. This allows a blueprint of your datacenter to be versioned and treated as you would any other code. Additionally, infrastructure can be shared and re-used.
  • Execution Plans: Terraform has a "planning" step where it generates an execution plan. The execution plan shows what Terraform will do when you call apply. This lets you avoid any surprises when Terraform manipulates infrastructure.
  • Resource Graph: Terraform builds a graph of all your resources, and parallelizes the creation and modification of any non-dependent resources. Because of this, Terraform builds infrastructure as efficiently as possible, and operators get insight into dependencies in their infrastructure.

"Easy to use" is the top reason why over 89 developers like Rancher, while over 80 developers mention "Infrastructure as code" as the leading cause for choosing Terraform.

Rancher and Terraform are both open source tools. Terraform with 17.4K GitHub stars and 4.77K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Rancher with 11.8K GitHub stars and 1.31K GitHub forks.

According to the StackShare community, Terraform has a broader approval, being mentioned in 490 company stacks & 298 developers stacks; compared to Rancher, which is listed in 88 company stacks and 35 developer stacks.

Decisions about Rancher and Terraform

Because Pulumi uses real programming languages, you can actually write abstractions for your infrastructure code, which is incredibly empowering. You still 'describe' your desired state, but by having a programming language at your fingers, you can factor out patterns, and package it up for easier consumption.

See more
Sergey Ivanov
Overview

We use Terraform to manage AWS cloud environment for the project. It is pretty complex, largely static, security-focused, and constantly evolving.

Terraform provides descriptive (declarative) way of defining the target configuration, where it can work out the dependencies between configuration elements and apply differences without re-provisioning the entire cloud stack.

Advantages

Terraform is vendor-neutral in a way that it is using a common configuration language (HCL) with plugins (providers) for multiple cloud and service providers.

Terraform keeps track of the previous state of the deployment and applies incremental changes, resulting in faster deployment times.

Terraform allows us to share reusable modules between projects. We have built an impressive library of modules internally, which makes it very easy to assemble a new project from pre-fabricated building blocks.

Disadvantages

Software is imperfect, and Terraform is no exception. Occasionally we hit annoying bugs that we have to work around. The interaction with any underlying APIs is encapsulated inside 3rd party Terraform providers, and any bug fixes or new features require a provider release. Some providers have very poor coverage of the underlying APIs.

Terraform is not great for managing highly dynamic parts of cloud environments. That part is better delegated to other tools or scripts.

Terraform state may go out of sync with the target environment or with the source configuration, which often results in painful reconciliation.

See more

I personally am not a huge fan of vendor lock in for multiple reasons:

  • I've seen cost saving moves to the cloud end up costing a fortune and trapping companies due to over utilization of cloud specific features.
  • I've seen S3 failures nearly take down half the internet.
  • I've seen companies get stuck in the cloud because they aren't built cloud agnostic.

I choose to use terraform for my cloud provisioning for these reasons:

  • It's cloud agnostic so I can use it no matter where I am.
  • It isn't difficult to use and uses a relatively easy to read language.
  • It tests infrastructure before running it, and enables me to see and keep changes up to date.
  • It runs from the same CLI I do most of my CM work from.
See more
Pros of Rancher
Pros of Terraform
  • 102
    Easy to use
  • 79
    Open source and totally free
  • 62
    Multi-host docker-compose support
  • 58
    Simple
  • 58
    Load balancing and health check included
  • 44
    Rolling upgrades, green/blue upgrades feature
  • 42
    Dns and service discovery out-of-the-box
  • 37
    Only requires docker
  • 34
    Multitenant and permission management
  • 29
    Easy to use and feature rich
  • 11
    Cross cloud compatible
  • 11
    Does everything needed for a docker infrastructure
  • 8
    Simple and powerful
  • 8
    Next-gen platform
  • 7
    Very Docker-friendly
  • 6
    Support Kubernetes and Swarm
  • 6
    Application catalogs with stack templates (wizards)
  • 6
    Supports Apache Mesos, Docker Swarm, and Kubernetes
  • 6
    Rolling and blue/green upgrades deployments
  • 6
    High Availability service: keeps your app up 24/7
  • 5
    Easy to use service catalog
  • 4
    Very intuitive UI
  • 4
    IaaS-vendor independent, supports hybrid/multi-cloud
  • 4
    Awesome support
  • 3
    Scalable
  • 2
    Requires less infrastructure requirements
  • 101
    Infrastructure as code
  • 68
    Declarative syntax
  • 43
    Planning
  • 26
    Simple
  • 23
    Parallelism
  • 6
    Cloud agnostic
  • 5
    It's like coding your infrastructure in simple English
  • 4
    Well-documented
  • 3
    Automates infrastructure deployments
  • 3
    Platform agnostic
  • 3
    Immutable infrastructure
  • 2
    Automation
  • 2
    Portability
  • 2
    Scales to hundreds of hosts
  • 2
    Extendable
  • 1
    Lightweight

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Rancher
Cons of Terraform
  • 7
    Hosting Rancher can be complicated
  • 1
    Doesn't have full support to GKE

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is Rancher?

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

What is Terraform?

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Rancher?
What companies use Terraform?

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Rancher?
What tools integrate with Terraform?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

PythonDockerKubernetes+7
3
605
May 21 2020 at 12:02AM
https://img.stackshare.io/stack/650371/default_35848f736f9651e77452a8a4ce3c2c953360dedf.png logo

Rancher Labs

Amazon EC2KubernetesGrafana+12
3
1064
Apr 16 2020 at 5:34AM
https://img.stackshare.io/stack/610930/default_dd31eaa73ce9b7325f68f6928685172a21da2b1f.png logo

Rancher Labs

KubernetesRancher+2
2
734
GitHubPythonGit+22
17
13041
JavaScriptGitHubPython+42
52
19265
What are some alternatives to Rancher and Terraform?
Kubernetes
Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
DC/OS
Unlike traditional operating systems, DC/OS spans multiple machines within a network, aggregating their resources to maximize utilization by distributed applications.
Portainer
Portainer is an open-source lightweight management UI which allows you to easily manage your Docker environments. Portainer is available on Windows, Linux and Mac. It has never been so easy to manage Docker !
Docker
The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere
Helm
Helm is the best way to find, share, and use software built for Kubernetes.
See all alternatives
Interest over time
How much does Rancher cost?
How much does Terraform cost?
Pricing unavailable
News about Rancher
More news