Scala vs Apache Spark

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Scala

10.8K
7.7K
+ 1
1.5K
Apache Spark

2.9K
3.5K
+ 1
140
Add tool

Apache Spark vs Scala: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Apache Spark and Scala are both popular technologies used in big data processing and analytics. While Apache Spark is a distributed computing framework, Scala is a programming language that runs on the Java Virtual Machine. Despite their differences, they can be used together to build efficient and scalable data processing applications.

  1. Performance and Scalability: Apache Spark is known for its superior performance and scalability compared to Scala. In Spark, data processing tasks are divided into smaller chunks and processed in parallel on a cluster of machines. This distributed computing approach allows Spark to handle large datasets and perform computations faster. On the other hand, Scala is a general-purpose programming language that can run on a single machine, limiting its scalability for big data processing.

  2. Data Processing Capabilities: Apache Spark provides a wide range of built-in libraries and APIs for various data processing tasks such as batch processing, real-time streaming, machine learning, and graph processing. These libraries and APIs make it easier for developers to perform complex data processing tasks without the need for additional tools or frameworks. In contrast, Scala provides a rich set of programming language features but lacks the specific data processing capabilities offered by Spark.

  3. Ease of Use: Scala is a programming language that follows a functional programming paradigm, which can be challenging for developers who are more familiar with object-oriented programming. On the other hand, Spark provides a high-level API that abstracts the underlying complexities of distributed computing, making it easier for developers to write and manage big data applications.

  4. Integration with other Technologies: Apache Spark integrates well with other big data technologies such as Hadoop, Hive, and HBase. This seamless integration allows Spark to leverage the existing infrastructure and data storage systems, making it a popular choice for big data processing. Scala, on the other hand, can be used with various libraries and frameworks, but it may require more effort to integrate with specific big data technologies.

  5. Job Execution Model: Apache Spark follows a Resilient Distributed Dataset (RDD) model, where data is stored in memory and can be processed multiple times. This in-memory processing model enables Spark to achieve faster execution times compared to traditional disk-based processing. Scala, on the other hand, follows a traditional execution model where data is read from disk and processed sequentially, which can result in slower execution times for large datasets.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Apache Spark has a large and vibrant community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources. The Spark ecosystem also includes various third-party libraries and tools that extend its functionality. This community-driven ecosystem makes it easier for developers to get help, find solutions, and leverage additional features. Scala also has a supportive community, but its ecosystem may not be as extensive as Spark's.

In summary, Apache Spark and Scala are both powerful technologies for big data processing, but they have distinct differences. Apache Spark excels in performance, scalability, and built-in data processing capabilities, while Scala offers a more general-purpose programming language with a rich set of features. Their integration with other technologies, job execution models, ease of use, and community support also differ.

Advice on Scala and Apache Spark
Needs advice
on
ScalaScala
and
Apache SparkApache Spark
in

I am new to Apache Spark and Scala both. I am basically a Java developer and have around 10 years of experience in Java.

I wish to work on some Machine learning or AI tech stacks. Please assist me in the tech stack and help make a clear Road Map. Any feedback is welcome.

Technologies apart from Scala and Spark are also welcome. Please note that the tools should be relevant to Machine Learning or Artificial Intelligence.

See more
Replies (1)
Channing Walton
Recommends
on
ScalaScala

I may be a little biased, but if you need some good introductions to Scala have a look at the free books from https://underscore.io/training/ - click through to each course and there is a free book.

See more
Nilesh Akhade
Technical Architect at Self Employed · | 5 upvotes · 529K views

We have a Kafka topic having events of type A and type B. We need to perform an inner join on both type of events using some common field (primary-key). The joined events to be inserted in Elasticsearch.

In usual cases, type A and type B events (with same key) observed to be close upto 15 minutes. But in some cases they may be far from each other, lets say 6 hours. Sometimes event of either of the types never come.

In all cases, we should be able to find joined events instantly after they are joined and not-joined events within 15 minutes.

See more
Replies (2)
Recommends
on
ElasticsearchElasticsearch

The first solution that came to me is to use upsert to update ElasticSearch:

  1. Use the primary-key as ES document id
  2. Upsert the records to ES as soon as you receive them. As you are using upsert, the 2nd record of the same primary-key will not overwrite the 1st one, but will be merged with it.

Cons: The load on ES will be higher, due to upsert.

To use Flink:

  1. Create a KeyedDataStream by the primary-key
  2. In the ProcessFunction, save the first record in a State. At the same time, create a Timer for 15 minutes in the future
  3. When the 2nd record comes, read the 1st record from the State, merge those two, and send out the result, and clear the State and the Timer if it has not fired
  4. When the Timer fires, read the 1st record from the State and send out as the output record.
  5. Have a 2nd Timer of 6 hours (or more) if you are not using Windowing to clean up the State

Pro: if you have already having Flink ingesting this stream. Otherwise, I would just go with the 1st solution.

See more
Akshaya Rawat
Senior Specialist Platform at Publicis Sapient · | 3 upvotes · 371.4K views
Recommends
on
Apache SparkApache Spark

Please refer "Structured Streaming" feature of Spark. Refer "Stream - Stream Join" at https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/structured-streaming-programming-guide.html#stream-stream-joins . In short you need to specify "Define watermark delays on both inputs" and "Define a constraint on time across the two inputs"

See more
Needs advice
on
GolangGolangNode.jsNode.js
and
ScalaScala

Finding the best server-side tool for building a personal information organizer that focuses on performance, simplicity, and scalability.

performance and scalability get a prototype going fast by keeping codebase simple find hosting that is affordable and scales well (Java/Scala-based ones might not be affordable)

See more
Replies (1)
David Annez
VP Product at loveholidays · | 5 upvotes · 297.8K views
Recommends
on
Node.jsNode.js
at

I've picked Node.js here but honestly it's a toss up between that and Go around this. It really depends on your background and skillset around "get something going fast" for one of these languages. Based on not knowing that I've suggested Node because it can be easier to prototype quickly and built right is performant enough. The scaffolding provided around Node.js services (Koa, Restify, NestJS) means you can get up and running pretty easily. It's important to note that the tooling surrounding this is good also, such as tracing, metrics et al (important when you're building production ready services).

You'll get more scalability and perf from go, but balancing them out I would say that you'll get pretty far with a well built Node.JS service (our entire site with over 1.5k requests/m scales easily and holds it's own with 4 pods in production.

Without knowing the scale you are building for and the systems you are using around it it's hard to say for certain this is the right route.

See more
Decisions about Scala and Apache Spark

We needed to incorporate Big Data Framework for data stream analysis, specifically Apache Spark / Apache Storm. The three options of languages were most suitable for the job - Python, Java, Scala.

The winner was Python for the top of the class, high-performance data analysis libraries (NumPy, Pandas) written in C, quick learning curve, quick prototyping allowance, and a great connection with other future tools for machine learning as Tensorflow.

The whole code was shorter & more readable which made it easier to develop and maintain.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Scala
Pros of Apache Spark
  • 187
    Static typing
  • 178
    Pattern-matching
  • 177
    Jvm
  • 172
    Scala is fun
  • 138
    Types
  • 95
    Concurrency
  • 88
    Actor library
  • 86
    Solve functional problems
  • 81
    Open source
  • 80
    Solve concurrency in a safer way
  • 44
    Functional
  • 24
    Fast
  • 23
    Generics
  • 18
    It makes me a better engineer
  • 17
    Syntactic sugar
  • 13
    Scalable
  • 10
    First-class functions
  • 10
    Type safety
  • 9
    Interactive REPL
  • 8
    Expressive
  • 7
    SBT
  • 6
    Case classes
  • 6
    Implicit parameters
  • 4
    Rapid and Safe Development using Functional Programming
  • 4
    JVM, OOP and Functional programming, and static typing
  • 4
    Object-oriented
  • 4
    Used by Twitter
  • 3
    Functional Proframming
  • 2
    Spark
  • 2
    Beautiful Code
  • 2
    Safety
  • 2
    Growing Community
  • 1
    DSL
  • 1
    Rich Static Types System and great Concurrency support
  • 1
    Naturally enforce high code quality
  • 1
    Akka Streams
  • 1
    Akka
  • 1
    Reactive Streams
  • 1
    Easy embedded DSLs
  • 1
    Mill build tool
  • 0
    Freedom to choose the right tools for a job
  • 61
    Open-source
  • 48
    Fast and Flexible
  • 8
    One platform for every big data problem
  • 8
    Great for distributed SQL like applications
  • 6
    Easy to install and to use
  • 3
    Works well for most Datascience usecases
  • 2
    Interactive Query
  • 2
    Machine learning libratimery, Streaming in real
  • 2
    In memory Computation

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Scala
Cons of Apache Spark
  • 11
    Slow compilation time
  • 7
    Multiple ropes and styles to hang your self
  • 6
    Too few developers available
  • 4
    Complicated subtyping
  • 2
    My coworkers using scala are racist against other stuff
  • 4
    Speed

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is Scala?

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

What is Apache Spark?

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Scala?
What companies use Apache Spark?
See which teams inside your own company are using Scala or Apache Spark.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Scala?
What tools integrate with Apache Spark?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

Mar 24 2021 at 12:57PM

Pinterest

GitJenkinsKafka+7
3
2162
MySQLKafkaApache Spark+6
2
2019
Aug 28 2019 at 3:10AM

Segment

PythonJavaAmazon S3+16
7
2570
DockerAmazon EC2Scala+8
6
2721
What are some alternatives to Scala and Apache Spark?
Kotlin
Kotlin is a statically typed programming language for the JVM, Android and the browser, 100% interoperable with Java
Python
Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.
Clojure
Clojure is designed to be a general-purpose language, combining the approachability and interactive development of a scripting language with an efficient and robust infrastructure for multithreaded programming. Clojure is a compiled language - it compiles directly to JVM bytecode, yet remains completely dynamic. Clojure is a dialect of Lisp, and shares with Lisp the code-as-data philosophy and a powerful macro system.
Java
Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!
Golang
Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.
See all alternatives