Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

TeamCity

1.1K
1.1K
+ 1
316
Terraform

18.6K
14.6K
+ 1
344
Add tool

TeamCity vs Terraform: What are the differences?

Introduction

TeamCity and Terraform are both popular tools used in software development and infrastructure management. While they serve different purposes, it is important to understand the key differences between them in order to make informed decisions about their usage. Here are six key differences between TeamCity and Terraform:

  1. Build Automation vs Infrastructure Provisioning: TeamCity is a build automation tool that focuses on continuous integration and deployment. It allows users to compile, test, and build software applications automatically. On the other hand, Terraform is an infrastructure provisioning tool that helps in creating and managing infrastructure resources such as servers, networks, and storage.

  2. Centralized vs Decentralized Configuration: TeamCity uses a centralized configuration approach where build configurations are stored and managed in a central server. This allows for easier management of build configurations and consistency across different projects. In contrast, Terraform uses a decentralized configuration approach where infrastructure configurations are written in code and stored in version control systems. This enables collaboration and makes it easier to manage infrastructure changes.

  3. Compatibility and Integration: TeamCity is specifically designed to integrate with various development tools, including version control systems, issue tracking systems, and testing frameworks. It offers out-of-the-box integrations with popular tools like Git, GitHub, JIRA, and Selenium. On the other hand, Terraform is designed to work with multiple cloud providers, such as AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. It provides a consistent way to manage infrastructure across different cloud platforms.

  4. Targeted Users: TeamCity is primarily targeted towards development teams and focuses on improving the software development and delivery process. It provides features like code analysis, automatic testing, and release management. On the other hand, Terraform is targeted towards infrastructure engineers and operators who are responsible for managing infrastructure resources. It provides a way to define and manage infrastructure as code.

  5. Deployment Scope: TeamCity is typically used for deploying applications and services within the development environment or continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. It is not designed for managing infrastructure resources at scale. In contrast, Terraform is specifically designed for managing infrastructure resources, and it can be used to provision and manage infrastructure across various environments, including development, staging, and production.

  6. Approach to Infrastructure Changes: TeamCity focuses on managing the build and deployment process by automatically triggering builds and deploying applications. It does not handle infrastructure changes directly, and any infrastructure changes need to be managed outside of TeamCity. On the other hand, Terraform provides a declarative approach to infrastructure changes. Infrastructure configurations are defined in code, and Terraform can automatically provision, modify, and destroy infrastructure resources based on the desired state.

In Summary, TeamCity is a build automation tool focused on continuous integration and deployment, whereas Terraform is an infrastructure provisioning tool used to create and manage infrastructure resources. TeamCity has a centralized configuration approach, while Terraform uses a decentralized configuration approach. TeamCity integrates with development tools, while Terraform works with cloud providers. TeamCity is targeted towards development teams, while Terraform is for infrastructure engineers. TeamCity is used for deploying applications within CI/CD pipelines, while Terraform can manage infrastructure across different environments. TeamCity does not handle infrastructure changes directly, while Terraform provides a declarative approach to infrastructure changes.

Decisions about TeamCity and Terraform

Because Pulumi uses real programming languages, you can actually write abstractions for your infrastructure code, which is incredibly empowering. You still 'describe' your desired state, but by having a programming language at your fingers, you can factor out patterns, and package it up for easier consumption.

See more
Sergey Ivanov
Overview

We use Terraform to manage AWS cloud environment for the project. It is pretty complex, largely static, security-focused, and constantly evolving.

Terraform provides descriptive (declarative) way of defining the target configuration, where it can work out the dependencies between configuration elements and apply differences without re-provisioning the entire cloud stack.

Advantages

Terraform is vendor-neutral in a way that it is using a common configuration language (HCL) with plugins (providers) for multiple cloud and service providers.

Terraform keeps track of the previous state of the deployment and applies incremental changes, resulting in faster deployment times.

Terraform allows us to share reusable modules between projects. We have built an impressive library of modules internally, which makes it very easy to assemble a new project from pre-fabricated building blocks.

Disadvantages

Software is imperfect, and Terraform is no exception. Occasionally we hit annoying bugs that we have to work around. The interaction with any underlying APIs is encapsulated inside 3rd party Terraform providers, and any bug fixes or new features require a provider release. Some providers have very poor coverage of the underlying APIs.

Terraform is not great for managing highly dynamic parts of cloud environments. That part is better delegated to other tools or scripts.

Terraform state may go out of sync with the target environment or with the source configuration, which often results in painful reconciliation.

See more

I personally am not a huge fan of vendor lock in for multiple reasons:

  • I've seen cost saving moves to the cloud end up costing a fortune and trapping companies due to over utilization of cloud specific features.
  • I've seen S3 failures nearly take down half the internet.
  • I've seen companies get stuck in the cloud because they aren't built cloud agnostic.

I choose to use terraform for my cloud provisioning for these reasons:

  • It's cloud agnostic so I can use it no matter where I am.
  • It isn't difficult to use and uses a relatively easy to read language.
  • It tests infrastructure before running it, and enables me to see and keep changes up to date.
  • It runs from the same CLI I do most of my CM work from.
See more

Context: I wanted to create an end to end IoT data pipeline simulation in Google Cloud IoT Core and other GCP services. I never touched Terraform meaningfully until working on this project, and it's one of the best explorations in my development career. The documentation and syntax is incredibly human-readable and friendly. I'm used to building infrastructure through the google apis via Python , but I'm so glad past Sung did not make that decision. I was tempted to use Google Cloud Deployment Manager, but the templates were a bit convoluted by first impression. I'm glad past Sung did not make this decision either.

Solution: Leveraging Google Cloud Build Google Cloud Run Google Cloud Bigtable Google BigQuery Google Cloud Storage Google Compute Engine along with some other fun tools, I can deploy over 40 GCP resources using Terraform!

Check Out My Architecture: CLICK ME

Check out the GitHub repo attached

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of TeamCity
Pros of Terraform
  • 61
    Easy to configure
  • 37
    Reliable and high-quality
  • 32
    User friendly
  • 32
    On premise
  • 32
    Github integration
  • 18
    Great UI
  • 16
    Smart
  • 12
    Free for open source
  • 12
    Can run jobs in parallel
  • 8
    Crossplatform
  • 5
    Chain dependencies
  • 5
    Fully-functional out of the box
  • 4
    Great support by jetbrains
  • 4
    REST API
  • 4
    Projects hierarchy
  • 4
    100+ plugins
  • 3
    Personal notifications
  • 3
    Free for small teams
  • 3
    Build templates
  • 3
    Per-project permissions
  • 2
    Upload build artifacts
  • 2
    Smart build failure analysis and tracking
  • 2
    Ide plugins
  • 2
    GitLab integration
  • 2
    Artifact dependencies
  • 2
    Official reliable support
  • 2
    Build progress messages promoting from running process
  • 1
    Repository-stored, full settings dsl with ide support
  • 1
    Built-in artifacts repository
  • 1
    Powerful build chains / pipelines
  • 1
    TeamCity Professional is FREE
  • 0
    High-Availability
  • 0
    Hosted internally
  • 121
    Infrastructure as code
  • 73
    Declarative syntax
  • 45
    Planning
  • 28
    Simple
  • 24
    Parallelism
  • 8
    Well-documented
  • 8
    Cloud agnostic
  • 6
    It's like coding your infrastructure in simple English
  • 6
    Immutable infrastructure
  • 5
    Platform agnostic
  • 4
    Extendable
  • 4
    Automation
  • 4
    Automates infrastructure deployments
  • 4
    Portability
  • 2
    Lightweight
  • 2
    Scales to hundreds of hosts

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of TeamCity
Cons of Terraform
  • 3
    High costs for more than three build agents
  • 2
    Proprietary
  • 2
    User-friendly
  • 2
    User friendly
  • 1
    Doesn't have full support to GKE

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is TeamCity?

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

What is Terraform?

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use TeamCity?
What companies use Terraform?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with TeamCity?
What tools integrate with Terraform?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

GitGitHubPython+22
17
14315
JavaScriptGitHubPython+42
53
22266
What are some alternatives to TeamCity and Terraform?
Jenkins
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
Appveyor
AppVeyor aims to give powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment tools to every .NET developer without the hassle of setting up and maintaining their own build server.
Hudson
It monitors the execution of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron. Among those things, currently it focuses on the two jobs
Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.
FinalBuilder
With FinalBuilder you don't need to edit xml, or write scripts. Visually define and debug your build scripts, then schedule them with windows scheduler, or integrate them with Continua CI, Jenkins or any other CI Server.
See all alternatives