StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. WhaTap vs Zabbix

WhaTap vs Zabbix

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Zabbix
Zabbix
Stacks684
Followers981
Votes66
GitHub Stars5.3K
Forks1.1K
WhaTap
WhaTap
Stacks7
Followers4
Votes0

WhaTap vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

  1. Monitoring Approach: WhaTap focuses on monitoring modern cloud-native environments with a focus on microservices, containers, and Kubernetes clusters. On the other hand, Zabbix is more traditional and primarily used for monitoring physical servers, virtual machines, and network devices.

  2. Ease of Use: WhaTap offers a user-friendly and intuitive interface, making it easier for users to navigate through the system and set up monitoring quickly. Alternatively, Zabbix has a steeper learning curve with a more complex setup process and configuration.

  3. Scalability: WhaTap is designed to scale effortlessly with growing infrastructure by leveraging cloud-native technologies such as auto-scaling and microservices architecture. In contrast, Zabbix may require manual intervention and tuning to handle large-scale deployments effectively.

  4. Integration Capabilities: WhaTap provides seamless integration with various cloud platforms, container orchestration tools, and popular DevOps tools, allowing for centralized monitoring and management. Zabbix, while offering integrations, may not have the same level of out-of-the-box compatibility with modern technologies.

  5. Real-time Monitoring: WhaTap emphasizes real-time monitoring and analytics, providing instant insights into system performance and issues to facilitate rapid decision-making. Zabbix offers real-time monitoring as well, but the setup may require additional customization and configuration.

  6. Community Support: Zabbix boasts a large and active community of users, developers, and contributors, providing a wealth of resources, plugins, and extensions. WhaTap, being a newer player in the market, may have a smaller community and ecosystem of add-ons and support resources.

In Summary, the key differences between WhaTap and Zabbix lie in their monitoring approach, ease of use, scalability, integration capabilities, real-time monitoring features, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Zabbix, WhaTap

vivek
vivek

Jun 8, 2020

Needs adviceonCentreonCentreonZabbixZabbixDatadogDatadog

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

796k views796k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Zabbix
Zabbix
WhaTap
WhaTap

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

It provides improvement points to locate the source of problems in hidden areas that were not found in other products.

Smart, Highly Automated Metric Collection; Advanced Problem Detection; Intelligent Alerting and Remediation
Easy to install and quickly experience; Real-time monitoring; Integrated monitoring; Microservice Architecture; Extensibility
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
684
Stacks
7
Followers
981
Followers
4
Votes
66
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 21
    Free
  • 9
    Alerts
  • 5
    Service/node/network discovery
  • 5
    Templates
  • 4
    Base metrics from the box
Cons
  • 5
    The UI is in PHP
  • 2
    Puppet module is sluggish
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Slack
Slack
Jira
Jira
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Grafana
Grafana
Ansible
Ansible
Skype
Skype
Chef
Chef
Bugzilla
Bugzilla
HipChat
HipChat
ServiceNow.com
ServiceNow.com
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
OpsGenie
OpsGenie
Zapier
Zapier
Librato
Librato
VictorOps
VictorOps
Geckoboard
Geckoboard
bip.io
bip.io

What are some alternatives to Zabbix, WhaTap?

Pingdom

Pingdom

Pingdom is an uptime monitoring service. When problems happen with a site that Pingdom monitors, it immediately alerts the owner so the problem can be taken care of.

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Better Stack

Better Stack

Better Stack is a radically better infrastructure monitoring platform that calls the right person on your team if anything goes wrong. Schedule on-call duties, receive helpful alerts, and collaborate on solving incidents faster than ever.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

UptimeRobot

UptimeRobot

It is all about helping you to keep your websites up. It monitors your websites every 5 minutes and alerts you if your sites are down.

Netdata

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Sensu

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

StatusCake

StatusCake

Monitoring a website is one thing – finding the best way to alert you to downtime another. At StatusCake we give you as many options as possible to decide when & how often you’re contacted. Whether it’s by email, SMS, push notifications for iOS & Android or integration with third party apps including Zapier and PagerDuty – you decide how you want to be alerted and when!

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana