StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Azure App Service vs Cloud Foundry

Azure App Service vs Cloud Foundry

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry
Stacks188
Followers346
Votes5
Azure App Service
Azure App Service
Stacks312
Followers380
Votes11

Azure App Service vs Cloud Foundry: What are the differences?

  1. Key Difference 1: Architecture Azure App Service is a Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering provided by Microsoft Azure, while Cloud Foundry is an open-source, multi-cloud application platform primarily used for deploying and managing applications.

  2. Key Difference 2: Hosting Options Azure App Service allows applications to be hosted on Microsoft's cloud infrastructure, providing a fully managed environment. In contrast, Cloud Foundry can be deployed on various cloud providers, giving users the flexibility to choose the hosting environment that best suits their needs.

  3. Key Difference 3: Support for Multiple Languages Azure App Service supports a wide range of programming languages including .NET, Java, Node.js, Python, and others. Cloud Foundry, on the other hand, offers support for multiple languages through buildpacks, which allows users to run applications written in various languages.

  4. Key Difference 4: Ecosystem and Marketplace Azure App Service provides an extensive ecosystem and marketplace that offers a wide range of services and extensions to enhance and integrate with applications. Cloud Foundry also has a vibrant ecosystem and marketplace, but it primarily focuses on providing a consistent platform for running applications rather than offering integrated services.

  5. Key Difference 5: Deployment and Scaling Azure App Service provides easy deployment options, allowing users to deploy applications directly from source control systems or through continuous integration and delivery pipelines. It also offers auto-scaling capabilities to handle increased workload. Cloud Foundry supports containerization technologies like Docker and provides a built-in orchestration layer for deploying and scaling applications.

  6. Key Difference 6: Vendor Lock-in Being a Microsoft Azure service, Azure App Service may have some degree of vendor lock-in as it relies on Azure-specific features and services. Cloud Foundry, being an open-source platform, offers more flexibility and avoids vendor lock-in by allowing deployment on various cloud providers.

In summary, Azure App Service is a PaaS offering provided by Microsoft Azure, while Cloud Foundry is an open-source, multi-cloud application platform. The key differences between the two lie in the architecture, hosting options, language support, ecosystem/marketplace, deployment/scaling options, and vendor lock-in.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry
Azure App Service
Azure App Service

Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.

Quickly build, deploy, and scale web apps created with popular frameworks .NET, .NET Core, Node.js, Java, PHP, Ruby, or Python, in containers or running on any operating system. Meet rigorous, enterprise-grade performance, security, and compliance requirements by using the fully managed platform for your operational and monitoring tasks.

Application and services centric lifecycle API;High performance dynamic routing;Buildpack support;Data and web services brokers;Linux Container management;Role Based Access and Teams;Active application health management;Standards based user authentication and authorization;Integrated real time logging API;Multi-provider ecosystem
-
Statistics
Stacks
188
Stacks
312
Followers
346
Followers
380
Votes
5
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Perfectly aligned with springboot
  • 1
    Application health management
  • 1
    Free service discovery (Eureka)
  • 1
    Free distributed tracing (zipkin)
Pros
  • 6
    .Net Framework
  • 5
    Visual studio
Integrations
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Logentries
Logentries
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
OpenStack
OpenStack
Papertrail
Papertrail
Amazon VPC
Amazon VPC
Splunk Cloud
Splunk Cloud
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Python
Python
.NET
.NET
Ruby
Ruby
PHP
PHP
Node.js
Node.js
.NET Core
.NET Core

What are some alternatives to Cloud Foundry, Azure App Service?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase