StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Error Tracking
  4. Exception Monitoring
  5. Backtrace vs Sentry

Backtrace vs Sentry

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sentry
Sentry
Stacks15.1K
Followers9.4K
Votes864
GitHub Stars42.4K
Forks4.5K
Backtrace
Backtrace
Stacks30
Followers22
Votes0

Backtrace vs Sentry: What are the differences?

Introduction

Below, we compare the key differences between Backtrace and Sentry.

  1. Architecture and Scalability: Backtrace and Sentry differ in their architecture and scalability. Backtrace is built on a distributed architecture with an emphasis on scalability, allowing it to handle large volumes of data and provide efficient workflows for bug tracking and resolution. On the other hand, Sentry is designed to be more lightweight and can be easily integrated into existing applications without significant performance overhead.

  2. Error Reporting and Monitoring: Both Backtrace and Sentry offer error reporting and monitoring capabilities. However, Backtrace provides more comprehensive error reporting features, including deep crash analysis, support for custom error data, and the ability to collect a wide range of context information at the time of error. Sentry, although it also provides error tracking and monitoring, may not offer the same level of granular crash analysis and data collection options.

  3. Integrations and Ecosystem: Backtrace and Sentry differ in their integrations and overall ecosystem. Backtrace has a vast ecosystem of integrations with various languages, frameworks, and services, allowing for seamless integration with existing development workflows and tools. In contrast, Sentry offers a more focused integrations ecosystem but still covers major programming languages and frameworks.

  4. Workflow and Collaboration: When it comes to workflow and collaboration features, Backtrace and Sentry provide different approaches. Backtrace prioritizes team collaboration and offers features like triaging, assigning, and resolving issues. It also provides advanced filtering and search capabilities to streamline bug tracking. Sentry, although it also offers collaboration features, focuses more on monitoring and alerting, providing real-time notifications and incident management functionality.

  5. Data Privacy and Security: Backtrace and Sentry have different approaches to data privacy and security. Backtrace allows for on-premises deployment, providing more control over sensitive data and meeting specific compliance requirements. On the other hand, Sentry primarily operates in a cloud-based environment, which may have implications for organizations with strict data privacy and security requirements.

  6. Pricing and Licensing: Backtrace and Sentry differ in their pricing and licensing models. Backtrace offers multiple pricing plans, including free and enterprise versions, with different levels of support and feature sets. Sentry also provides free and paid plans, but its pricing is primarily based on the number of events captured and stored, which may be a determinant factor for organizations with high event volumes.

In Summary, Backtrace and Sentry have key differences in their architecture, error reporting capabilities, integrations, workflow approach, data privacy, and pricing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Sentry, Backtrace

Nicholas
Nicholas

Jun 1, 2020

Decided

I essentially inherited a Shopify theme that was originally created by an agency. After discovering a number of errors being thrown in the Dev Console just by scrolling through the website, I needed more visibility over any errors happening in the field. Having used both Sentry and TrackJS, I always got lost in the TrackJS interface, so I felt more comfortable introducing Sentry. The Sentry free tier is also very generous, although it turns out the theme threw over 15k errors in less than a week.

I highly recommend setting up error tracking from day one. Theoretically, you should never need to upgrade from the free tier if you're keeping on top of the errors...

250k views250k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Sentry
Sentry
Backtrace
Backtrace

Sentry’s Application Monitoring platform helps developers see performance issues, fix errors faster, and optimize their code health.

It is the first debugging platform built for enterprise-grade software. It improves system availability, software quality and team efficiency by bringing automation to incident detection, response and resolution. The debugging platform automatically snapshots faulting applications and their surrounding environments then, analyzes and archives them in a centralized object store so bugs don't get missed and get fixed faster.

Real-Time Updates: For the first time, developers can fix code-level issues anywhere in the stack well before users even encounter an error.;Complete Context: Spend more time where it matters, rather than investing in low-impact issues.;Integrate Everywhere: Drop-in integration for every major platform, framework, and language -- JavaScript, Python, PHP, Ruby, Node, Java, .NET, mobile.;Root Cause: See the events that lead to errors so you always debug the right thing the first time.;Private & Secure: Sentry is SOC-2 compliant with GDPR, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and Privacy Shield by default.;Open Source: Sentry is 100% open source and available on GitHub.
Automated capture, notification, and analysis of software errors for SREs/Ops and Developers; Automated analysis crawls application state + code to give you a head start on root cause analysis; Captures a rich data set which includes stacktrace across all threads, reachable variables, system information and much more; Includes support for C/C++; Powerful customizable graphs, visualizations, queries; Custom grouping and classification; Workflow Integration into Slack, HipChat, GitHub, JIRA, etc; Completely extensible crash format and debugger; Orders of magnitudes faster than today's debuggers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
42.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
15.1K
Stacks
30
Followers
9.4K
Followers
22
Votes
864
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 238
    Consolidates similar errors and makes resolution easy
  • 121
    Email Notifications
  • 108
    Open source
  • 84
    Slack integration
  • 71
    Github integration
Cons
  • 12
    Confusing UI
  • 4
    Bundle size
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Sprint.ly
Sprint.ly
C#
C#
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Twilio
Twilio
Auth0
Auth0
Golang
Golang
Datadog
Datadog
Backbone.js
Backbone.js
Django
Django
Swift
Swift
GitHub
GitHub
Slack
Slack
Datadog
Datadog
Jira
Jira
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Stride
Stride

What are some alternatives to Sentry, Backtrace?

Rollbar

Rollbar

Rollbar is the leading continuous code improvement platform that proactively discovers, predicts, and remediates errors with real-time AI-assisted workflows. With Rollbar, developers continually improve their code and constantly innovate ra

Bugsnag

Bugsnag

Bugsnag captures errors from your web, mobile and back-end applications, providing instant visibility into user impact. Diagnostic data and tools are included to help your team prioritize, debug and fix exceptions fast.

Raygun

Raygun

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.

Opbeat

Opbeat

Opbeat is application monitoring for developers, and gives you performance metrics, error logging, release tracking and workflow in one smart product.

Airbrake

Airbrake

Airbrake collects errors for your applications in all major languages and frameworks. We alert you to new errors and give you critical context, trends and details needed to find and fix errors fast.

Honeybadger

Honeybadger

Honeybadger does more than report errors, it helps you work with your team to fix them. Errors can be assigned. You can comment via email. And a fine-grained permissions system means you control who has access to each specific project.

Errbit

Errbit

Errbit is a tool for collecting and managing errors from other applications. It is Airbrake (formerly known as Hoptoad) API compliant, so if you are already using Airbrake, you can just point the airbrake gem to your Errbit server.

OverOps

OverOps

OverOps maps the DNA of code as it’s executing in pre-prod and production to Identify all issues and anomalies, and deliver True Root Cause to the right person, without relying on logs.

TrackJS

TrackJS

Production error monitoring and reporting for web applications. TrackJS provides deep insights into real user errors. See the user, network, and application events that tell the story of an error so you can actually fix them.

App Enlight

App Enlight

App Enlight provides a helpful interface to let you and your team save time spent on debugging and reproducing exceptions and performance issues from a production environment.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana