StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Bamboo vs Buildkite

Bamboo vs Buildkite

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Buildkite
Buildkite
Stacks210
Followers231
Votes115
Bamboo
Bamboo
Stacks504
Followers549
Votes17

Bamboo vs Buildkite: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between Bamboo and Buildkite

Bamboo and Buildkite are both popular continuous integration and deployment tools that offer various features to streamline the software development and release processes. However, they differ in several key aspects.

1. Pricing Model: Bamboo follows a traditional licensing model, where users have to pay based on the number of build agents they require. On the other hand, Buildkite offers a flexible pricing structure that is based on the number of concurrent build and deployment pipelines.

2. Scalability and Performance: Bamboo is known for its scalability and performance, particularly for larger organizations, as it can handle a substantial number of build agents and integrate with Atlassian’s ecosystem seamlessly. In contrast, Buildkite offers a lightweight and highly scalable solution that is based on a distributed architecture. It can efficiently manage and scale large build systems without a centralized bottleneck.

3. Flexibility and Customization: Buildkite provides extensive flexibility and customization options for defining and configuring build and deployment pipelines. It allows users to utilize their own scripts and tools to fit their specific requirements. On the other hand, Bamboo provides a more opinionated approach, offering less flexibility and customization options compared to Buildkite.

4. User Interface and Ease of Use: Bamboo offers a user-friendly and intuitive interface that is well-integrated with other Atlassian products such as Jira and Bitbucket. It provides a seamless experience for Atlassian users. Buildkite, on the other hand, has a clean and minimalistic UI that focuses on simplicity and ease of use, making it easier for users to navigate and understand the platform.

5. Integration Ecosystem: Bamboo has strong integration capabilities with other Atlassian products and offers a comprehensive ecosystem for managing software development and deployment processes. It provides seamless integration with Jira, Bitbucket, and other Atlassian tools. Buildkite, on the other hand, offers fewer integrations out of the box, but provides an open API that allows users to build custom integrations and extensions.

6. Community and Support: Bamboo benefits from the support of a large and active community due to its association with Atlassian. It provides extensive documentation, community forums, and a wide range of resources. Buildkite, being a relatively newer tool, has a smaller community but offers responsive and helpful support to its users.

In summary, Bamboo and Buildkite differ in terms of pricing, scalability, flexibility, user interface, integration ecosystem, and community support. While Bamboo offers a more opinionated and integrated approach for Atlassian users, Buildkite provides a lightweight and flexible solution with a focus on customization and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Buildkite
Buildkite
Bamboo
Bamboo

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.

Fast and stable builds; Open source agent runs on almost any machine and architecture; Freedom to use your own internal or pre-release tools and services; Powerful distributed build tools; Key/value targeting of agents; Dynamic job allocation allows adding and removing build machines; Shared key/value and binary artifact stores for easily distributing build jobs regardless of machine or network; Integration with pull requests, deployments and releases; GitHub, Github Enterprise, Bitbucket, Gitlab or your own SCM; Slack, Hipchat, Webhooks, and LIFX notifications; Extensible per-project with agent hooks, webhooks and the rest API; GitHub Enterprise is supported standard; SSO
-
Statistics
Stacks
210
Stacks
504
Followers
231
Followers
549
Votes
115
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 18
    Great customer support
  • 17
    Github integration
  • 16
    Easy setup
  • 16
    Easy to use
  • 12
    Simplicity
Pros
  • 10
    Integrates with other Atlassian tools
  • 4
    Great notification scheme
  • 2
    Great UI
  • 1
    Has Deployment Projects
Cons
  • 6
    Expensive
  • 1
    Low community support
  • 1
    Bad integration with docker
  • 1
    Bad UI
Integrations
Slack
Slack
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
GitLab
GitLab
Heroku
Heroku
HipChat
HipChat
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Git
Git
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
TestFlight
TestFlight
Confluence
Confluence
Jira
Jira
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
HipChat
HipChat

What are some alternatives to Buildkite, Bamboo?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Snap CI

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana