Alternatives to Box logo

Alternatives to Box

Dropbox, OneDrive, Google Drive, CloudFlare, and Amazon CloudFront are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Box.
237
44

What is Box and what are its top alternatives?

Box is a cloud storage and collaboration platform that allows users to securely store, manage, and share their files online. It offers features such as file synchronization, file sharing, and collaboration tools like document editing and task management. However, some limitations of Box include limited storage capacity for free accounts, restrictions on file size uploads, and a higher price point compared to some competitors.

  1. Dropbox: Dropbox is a popular cloud storage service that offers similar features to Box, including file synchronization, file sharing, and collaboration tools. It provides seamless integration with third-party apps and platforms. Pros of Dropbox include user-friendly interface and excellent file versioning, while cons include limited storage space for free accounts.

  2. Google Drive: Google Drive is another prominent cloud storage service that offers collaboration tools like real-time editing and commenting. It seamlessly integrates with other Google services like Docs, Sheets, and Slides. Pros of Google Drive include generous free storage capacity and easy integration with Google Workspace, while cons include potential privacy concerns.

  3. OneDrive: OneDrive is Microsoft's cloud storage service that offers seamless integration with Windows devices and Microsoft Office applications. It provides features such as file synchronization, file sharing, and collaboration tools. Pros of OneDrive include easy access to Office apps and generous free storage space, while cons include occasional syncing issues.

  4. Tresorit: Tresorit is a secure cloud storage service that focuses on encryption and privacy. It offers end-to-end encryption for files and provides features like file sharing and collaboration tools. Pros of Tresorit include high level of security and privacy, while cons include limited free storage capacity.

  5. Sync.com: Sync.com is a cloud storage service that prioritizes security and privacy. It offers end-to-end encryption and features like file sharing and collaboration tools. Pros of Sync.com include zero-knowledge encryption and generous free storage space, while cons include limited third-party app integrations.

  6. pCloud: pCloud is a cloud storage service that offers a balance between storage capacity and security. It provides features like file synchronization, file sharing, and collaboration tools. Pros of pCloud include affordable pricing and robust encryption, while cons include limited collaboration features.

  7. Mega: Mega is a cloud storage service that emphasizes privacy and security with end-to-end encryption. It offers features such as file sharing and collaboration tools. Pros of Mega include generous free storage space and strong security measures, while cons include slower upload speeds.

  8. Zoho WorkDrive: Zoho WorkDrive is a cloud storage and collaboration platform that integrates seamlessly with other Zoho productivity apps. It offers features like file synchronization, file sharing, and team collaboration tools. Pros of Zoho WorkDrive include seamless integration with Zoho apps and affordable pricing, while cons include limited storage capacity.

  9. Nextcloud: Nextcloud is an open-source self-hosted cloud storage solution that puts a strong emphasis on privacy and security. It offers features like file synchronization, file sharing, and collaboration tools. Pros of Nextcloud include full control over data and privacy, while cons include technical expertise required for self-hosting.

  10. OwnCloud: OwnCloud is another open-source self-hosted cloud storage solution that provides users with full control over their data. It offers features like file synchronization, file sharing, and collaboration tools. Pros of OwnCloud include complete data control and customization options, while cons include potential setup and maintenance complexities.

Top Alternatives to Box

  • Dropbox
    Dropbox

    Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more. ...

  • OneDrive
    OneDrive

    Outlook.com is a free, personal email service from Microsoft. Keep your inbox clutter-free with powerful organizational tools, and collaborate easily with OneDrive and Office Online integration. ...

  • Google Drive
    Google Drive

    Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer. ...

  • CloudFlare
    CloudFlare

    Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...

  • Amazon CloudFront
    Amazon CloudFront

    Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance. ...

  • Akamai
    Akamai

    If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward. ...

  • MaxCDN
    MaxCDN

    The MaxCDN Content Delivery Network efficiently delivers your site’s static file through hundreds of servers instead of slogging through a single host. This "smart route" technology distributes your content to your visitors via the city closest to them. ...

  • Incapsula
    Incapsula

    Through an application-aware, global content delivery network (CDN), Incapsula provides any website and web application with best-of-breed security, DDoS protection, load balancing and failover solutions. ...

Box alternatives & related posts

Dropbox logo

Dropbox

23.3K
18.2K
1.7K
Build the power of Dropbox into your apps
23.3K
18.2K
+ 1
1.7K
PROS OF DROPBOX
  • 434
    Easy to work with
  • 256
    Free
  • 216
    Popular
  • 176
    Shared file hosting
  • 167
    'just works'
  • 100
    No brainer
  • 79
    Integration with external services
  • 76
    Simple
  • 49
    Good api
  • 38
    Least cost (free) for the basic needs case
  • 11
    It just works
  • 8
    Convenient
  • 7
    Accessible from all of my devices
  • 5
    Command Line client
  • 4
    Synchronizing laptop and desktop - work anywhere
  • 4
    Can even be used by your grandma
  • 3
    Reliable
  • 3
    Sync API
  • 3
    Mac app
  • 3
    Cross platform app
  • 2
    Ability to pay monthly without losing your files
  • 2
    Delta synchronization
  • 2
    Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliably
  • 2
    Backups, local and cloud
  • 2
    Extended version history
  • 2
    Beautiful UI
  • 1
    YC Company
  • 1
    What a beautiful app
  • 1
    Easy/no setup
  • 1
    So easy
  • 1
    The more the merrier
  • 1
    Easy to work with
  • 1
    For when client needs file without opening firewall
  • 1
    Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliabl
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Official Linux app
  • 0
    The more the merrier
CONS OF DROPBOX
  • 3
    Personal vs company account is confusing
  • 1
    Replication kills CPU and battery

related Dropbox posts

Shared insights
on
Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

See more
Shared insights
on
BoxBoxDropboxDropboxKloudlessKloudless

Anyone recommend a good connector like Kloudless for connecting a SaaS app to Dropbox/Box etc? Cheers

See more
OneDrive logo

OneDrive

291
195
6
Save your files and photos to OneDrive and get them from any device, anywhere
291
195
+ 1
6
PROS OF ONEDRIVE
  • 2
    FREE
  • 2
    Simple
  • 1
    Back up
  • 1
    Stable service
CONS OF ONEDRIVE
    Be the first to leave a con

    related OneDrive posts

    Google Drive logo

    Google Drive

    81.9K
    68.1K
    2.1K
    A safe place for all your files
    81.9K
    68.1K
    + 1
    2.1K
    PROS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
    • 505
      Easy to use
    • 326
      Gmail integration
    • 312
      Enough free space
    • 268
      Collaboration
    • 249
      Stable service
    • 128
      Desktop and mobile apps
    • 97
      Offline sync
    • 79
      Apps
    • 74
      15 gb storage
    • 50
      Add-ons
    • 9
      Integrates well
    • 6
      Easy to use
    • 3
      Simple back-up tool
    • 2
      Amazing
    • 2
      Beautiful
    • 2
      Fast upload speeds
    • 2
      The more the merrier
    • 2
      So easy
    • 2
      Wonderful
    • 2
      Linux terminal transfer tools
    • 2
      It has grown to a stable in the cloud office
    • 1
      UI
    • 1
      Windows desktop
    • 1
      G Suite integration
    CONS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
    • 7
      Organization via web ui sucks
    • 2
      Not a real database

    related Google Drive posts

    Tom Klein

    Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

    See more
    Shared insights
    on
    Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

    I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

    Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

    See more
    CloudFlare logo

    CloudFlare

    76.6K
    22.5K
    1.8K
    The Web Performance & Security Company.
    76.6K
    22.5K
    + 1
    1.8K
    PROS OF CLOUDFLARE
    • 424
      Easy setup, great cdn
    • 277
      Free ssl
    • 199
      Easy setup
    • 190
      Security
    • 180
      Ssl
    • 98
      Great cdn
    • 77
      Optimizer
    • 71
      Simple
    • 44
      Great UI
    • 28
      Great js cdn
    • 12
      Apps
    • 12
      HTTP/2 Support
    • 12
      DNS Analytics
    • 12
      AutoMinify
    • 9
      Rocket Loader
    • 9
      Ipv6
    • 9
      Easy
    • 8
      IPv6 "One Click"
    • 8
      Fantastic CDN service
    • 7
      DNSSEC
    • 7
      Nice DNS
    • 7
      SSHFP
    • 7
      Free GeoIP
    • 7
      Amazing performance
    • 7
      API
    • 7
      Cheapest SSL
    • 6
      SPDY
    • 6
      Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else
    • 5
      Ubuntu
    • 5
      Asynchronous resource loading
    • 4
      Global Load Balancing
    • 4
      Performance
    • 4
      Easy Use
    • 3
      CDN
    • 2
      Registrar
    • 2
      Support for SSHFP records
    • 1
      Web3
    • 1
      Прохси
    • 1
      HTTPS3/Quic
    CONS OF CLOUDFLARE
    • 2
      No support for SSHFP records
    • 2
      Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits

    related CloudFlare posts

    Tom Klein

    Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

    See more
    Johnny Bell

    When I first built my portfolio I used GitHub for the source control and deployed directly to Netlify on a push to master. This was a perfect setup, I didn't need any knowledge about #DevOps or anything, it was all just done for me.

    One of the issues I had with Netlify was I wanted to gzip my JavaScript files, I had this setup in my #Webpack file, however Netlify didn't offer an easy way to set this.

    Over the weekend I decided I wanted to know more about how #DevOps worked so I decided to switch from Netlify to Amazon S3. Instead of creating any #Git Webhooks I decided to use Buddy for my pipeline and to run commands. Buddy is a fantastic tool, very easy to setup builds, copying the files to my Amazon S3 bucket, then running some #AWS console commands to set the content-encoding of the JavaScript files. - Buddy is also free if you only have a few pipelines, so I didn't need to pay anything 🤙🏻.

    When I made these changes I also wanted to monitor my code, and make sure I was keeping up with the best practices so I implemented Code Climate to look over my code and tell me where there code smells, issues, and other issues I've been super happy with it so far, on the free tier so its also free.

    I did plan on using Amazon CloudFront for my SSL and cacheing, however it was overly complex to setup and it costs money. So I decided to go with the free tier of CloudFlare and it is amazing, best choice I've made for caching / SSL in a long time.

    See more
    Amazon CloudFront logo

    Amazon CloudFront

    21.3K
    10.7K
    935
    Content delivery with low latency and high data transfer speeds
    21.3K
    10.7K
    + 1
    935
    PROS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
    • 245
      Fast
    • 166
      Cdn
    • 157
      Compatible with other aws services
    • 125
      Simple
    • 108
      Global
    • 41
      Cheap
    • 36
      Cost-effective
    • 27
      Reliable
    • 19
      One stop solution
    • 9
      Elastic
    • 1
      Object store
    • 1
      HTTP/2 Support
    CONS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
    • 3
      UI could use some work
    • 1
      Invalidations take so long

    related Amazon CloudFront posts

    Russel Werner
    Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 32 upvotes · 2.8M views

    StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

    Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

    #StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

    See more
    Julien DeFrance
    Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 16 upvotes · 3.2M views

    Back in 2014, I was given an opportunity to re-architect SmartZip Analytics platform, and flagship product: SmartTargeting. This is a SaaS software helping real estate professionals keeping up with their prospects and leads in a given neighborhood/territory, finding out (thanks to predictive analytics) who's the most likely to list/sell their home, and running cross-channel marketing automation against them: direct mail, online ads, email... The company also does provide Data APIs to Enterprise customers.

    I had inherited years and years of technical debt and I knew things had to change radically. The first enabler to this was to make use of the cloud and go with AWS, so we would stop re-inventing the wheel, and build around managed/scalable services.

    For the SaaS product, we kept on working with Rails as this was what my team had the most knowledge in. We've however broken up the monolith and decoupled the front-end application from the backend thanks to the use of Rails API so we'd get independently scalable micro-services from now on.

    Our various applications could now be deployed using AWS Elastic Beanstalk so we wouldn't waste any more efforts writing time-consuming Capistrano deployment scripts for instance. Combined with Docker so our application would run within its own container, independently from the underlying host configuration.

    Storage-wise, we went with Amazon S3 and ditched any pre-existing local or network storage people used to deal with in our legacy systems. On the database side: Amazon RDS / MySQL initially. Ultimately migrated to Amazon RDS for Aurora / MySQL when it got released. Once again, here you need a managed service your cloud provider handles for you.

    Future improvements / technology decisions included:

    Caching: Amazon ElastiCache / Memcached CDN: Amazon CloudFront Systems Integration: Segment / Zapier Data-warehousing: Amazon Redshift BI: Amazon Quicksight / Superset Search: Elasticsearch / Amazon Elasticsearch Service / Algolia Monitoring: New Relic

    As our usage grows, patterns changed, and/or our business needs evolved, my role as Engineering Manager then Director of Engineering was also to ensure my team kept on learning and innovating, while delivering on business value.

    One of these innovations was to get ourselves into Serverless : Adopting AWS Lambda was a big step forward. At the time, only available for Node.js (Not Ruby ) but a great way to handle cost efficiency, unpredictable traffic, sudden bursts of traffic... Ultimately you want the whole chain of services involved in a call to be serverless, and that's when we've started leveraging Amazon DynamoDB on these projects so they'd be fully scalable.

    See more
    Akamai logo

    Akamai

    1.9K
    439
    0
    The leading platform for cloud, mobile, media and security across any device, anywhere.
    1.9K
    439
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF AKAMAI
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF AKAMAI
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Akamai posts

        MaxCDN logo

        MaxCDN

        1.6K
        553
        100
        Our CDN makes your site load faster!
        1.6K
        553
        + 1
        100
        PROS OF MAXCDN
        • 47
          Easy setup
        • 33
          Speed to my clients
        • 15
          Great service & Customer Support
        • 5
          Shared and Affordable SSL
        CONS OF MAXCDN
          Be the first to leave a con

          related MaxCDN posts

          Justin Dorfman
          Open Source Program Manager at Reblaze · | 4 upvotes · 244.3K views

          When my SSL cert MaxCDN was expiring on my personal site I decided it was a good time to revamp some things. Since GitHub Services is depreciated I can no longer have #CDN cache purges automated among other things. So I decided on the following: GitHub Pages, Netlify, Let's Encrypt and Jekyll. Staying the same was Bootstrap, jQuery, Grunt & #GoogleFonts.

          What's awesome about GitHub Pages is that it has a #CDN (Fastly) built-in and anytime you push to master, it purges the cache instantaneously without you have to do anything special. Netlify is magic, I highly recommend it to anyone using #StaticSiteGenerators.

          For the most part, everything went smoothly. The only things I had issues with were the following:

          • If you want to point www to GitHub Pages you need to rename the repo to www
          • If you edit something in the _config.yml you need to restart bundle exec jekyll s or changes won't show
          • I had to disable the Grunt htmlmin module. I replaced it with Jekyll layout that compresses HTML for #webperf

          Last but certainly not least, I made a donation to Let's Encrypt. If you use their service consider doing it too: https://letsencrypt.org/donate/

          See more
          Todd Gardner

          We migrated the hosting of our CDN, which is used to serve the JavaScript Error collection agent, from Amazon CloudFront to MaxCDN. During our test, we found MaxCDN to be more reliable and less expensive for serving he file.

          The reports and controls were also considerably better.

          See more
          Incapsula logo

          Incapsula

          1.3K
          72
          5
          Cloud-based service that makes websites safer, faster and more reliable.
          1.3K
          72
          + 1
          5
          PROS OF INCAPSULA
          • 5
            Best of them
          CONS OF INCAPSULA
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Incapsula posts