StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Cloud Foundry vs Dokku

Cloud Foundry vs Dokku

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry
Stacks188
Followers346
Votes5
Dokku
Dokku
Stacks180
Followers216
Votes69
GitHub Stars31.4K
Forks2.0K

Cloud Foundry vs Dokku: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of platform-as-a-service (PaaS) solutions, Cloud Foundry and Dokku are two popular options that offer differences in their approaches and capabilities. Below are the key differences between Cloud Foundry and Dokku that developers and businesses should consider.

  1. Deployment Methodology: Cloud Foundry utilizes a structured and automated approach to application deployment, managing the entire lifecycle from source code to running instances with built-in scaling and load balancing features. On the other hand, Dokku is a more simplistic platform that takes a Heroku-inspired approach, leveraging Docker containers for easy deployment without the need for complex configuration.

  2. Ease of Use: Cloud Foundry provides a comprehensive set of tools and services, but this can lead to a steeper learning curve for new users due to its complexity and extensive feature set. In contrast, Dokku is known for its simplicity and minimalism, offering a lightweight and straightforward setup that appeals to developers looking for a quick and easy deployment solution.

  3. Scalability: Cloud Foundry is designed to handle large-scale applications and enterprise-level workloads, offering robust clustering and scaling capabilities that can support high traffic volumes and complex applications. While Dokku is capable of scaling applications using Docker containers, it may require additional configuration and management efforts compared to Cloud Foundry.

  4. Community Support: Cloud Foundry has a large and active community of developers and contributors, providing extensive documentation, resources, and support for users. On the other hand, Dokku has a smaller community but benefits from its integration with popular tools and technologies like Docker and Git, making it a suitable choice for users familiar with these platforms.

  5. Integration with External Services: Cloud Foundry offers seamless integration with various external services and platforms through its marketplace, allowing users to easily add and manage services like databases, messaging systems, and monitoring tools. In contrast, Dokku relies on third-party plugins and manual configurations for integrating external services, which may require more effort and expertise from users.

  6. Customization and Flexibility: Cloud Foundry provides a standardized and opinionated platform with limited customization options, focusing on consistency and best practices for application development. In comparison, Dokku allows for more flexibility and control over the deployment environment, enabling users to tailor their setup to specific requirements and preferences.

In Summary, Cloud Foundry is a powerful and feature-rich PaaS solution suited for complex enterprise applications, while Dokku offers a simpler and more lightweight alternative that prioritizes ease of use and customization for smaller projects and individual developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry
Dokku
Dokku

Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Application and services centric lifecycle API;High performance dynamic routing;Buildpack support;Data and web services brokers;Linux Container management;Role Based Access and Teams;Active application health management;Standards based user authentication and authorization;Integrated real time logging API;Multi-provider ecosystem
Open source PAAS alternative to Heroku; No vendor lock-in; Getting started is extremely easy; Extensible & customizable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
31.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.0K
Stacks
188
Stacks
180
Followers
346
Followers
216
Votes
5
Votes
69
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Perfectly aligned with springboot
  • 1
    Free distributed tracing (zipkin)
  • 1
    Application health management
  • 1
    Free service discovery (Eureka)
Pros
  • 23
    Simple
  • 12
    Open Source
  • 11
    Free
  • 11
    Built on Docker
  • 4
    Git deploy
Integrations
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Logentries
Logentries
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
OpenStack
OpenStack
Papertrail
Papertrail
Amazon VPC
Amazon VPC
Splunk Cloud
Splunk Cloud
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Semaphore
Semaphore
Drone.io
Drone.io
CloudBees
CloudBees
Arch Linux
Arch Linux
GitLab CI
GitLab CI
Travis CI
Travis CI
CircleCI
CircleCI
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions
Debian
Debian

What are some alternatives to Cloud Foundry, Dokku?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

PythonAnywhere

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase