What is Codeception and what are its top alternatives?
Codeception is a popular PHP testing framework that offers a BDD-style approach to writing functional and acceptance tests. It supports various testing types such as acceptance, functional, and unit tests, making it versatile for testing web applications. Codeception provides clear and readable test scenarios using Gherkin language, integration with popular PHP frameworks like Laravel and Symfony, and great documentation. However, it may have a steep learning curve for beginners, and some users find the configuration process cumbersome.
- PHPUnit: PHPUnit is a robust unit testing framework for PHP with a focus on simplicity and ease of use. Key features include assertion methods for different data types, support for test dependencies, and the ability to generate code coverage reports. Pros: Widely used and well-documented, Cons: Primarily for unit testing.
- Behat: Behat is a behavior-driven development (BDD) framework that uses Gherkin syntax for test scenarios. It promotes collaboration between developers, QA, and non-technical stakeholders. Key features include clear test automation and human-readable scenarios. Pros: Promotes communication and collaboration, Cons: Limited to BDD.
- PHPUnit-Selenium: PHPUnit-Selenium is an extension to PHPUnit that enables Selenium WebDriver integration for browser automation testing. Key features include cross-browser testing, parallel execution, and support for JavaScript testing. Pros: Integrate Selenium with PHPUnit, Cons: Setup can be complex.
- Kahlan: Kahlan is a full-featured unit and Behavior Driven Development (BDD) test framework for PHP that offers a readable and expressive syntax. Key features include test doubles, code coverage, and a flexible matcher system. Pros: Expressive syntax, Cons: Limited online resources.
- CodeCeption Cest: CodeCeption Cest provides an alternative way of organizing tests using a class-based approach with methods representing test scenarios. Key features include easy-to-read test structure, data sharing between tests, and PHPUnit integration. Pros: Improved test organization, Cons: Limited customization options.
- Atoum: Atoum is a simple, modern, and intuitive PHP unit testing framework that focuses on developer productivity. Key features include a fluent and expressive syntax, built-in mocking, and code coverage reports. Pros: Lightweight and fast, Cons: Limited community support.
- PHPSpec: PHPSpec is a design by example (DbE) framework that encourages developers to design their code using behavior specifications before implementing functionality. Key features include easy setup, intuitive syntax, and support for TDD. Pros: Focuses on design-first approach, Cons: Steeper learning curve.
- Peridot: Peridot is a highly extensible and event-driven testing framework for PHP that aims to provide a flexible and enjoyable testing experience. Key features include asynchronous tests, custom reporters, and plugins support. Pros: Extensible and customizable, Cons: Limited online resources.
- Jest: Jest is a JavaScript testing framework with a focus on simplicity and performance. Key features include snapshot testing, code coverage reports, and built-in mocking capabilities. Pros: Fast and easy to use, Cons: Limited to JavaScript testing.
- Mockery: Mockery is a simple yet flexible PHP mock object framework for unit testing. Key features include fluent API for creating mocks, customizable behavior, and support for stubbing and mocking. Pros: Easy to use and powerful, Cons: Limited to mocking in unit tests.
Top Alternatives to Codeception
SeleniumSelenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well. ...
PHPUnitPHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks. ...
BehatIt is an open source Behavior-Driven Development framework for PHP. It is a tool to support you in delivering software that matters through continuous communication, deliberate discovery and test-automation. ...
CodeceptJSIt is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it. ...
CypressCypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website. ...
CucumberCucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs. ...
TestCafeIt is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports. ...
PhpSpecIt is a tool which can help you write clean and working PHP code using behaviour driven development or BDD. BDD is a technique derived from test-first development. ...
Codeception alternatives & related posts
- Automates browsers177
- Testing154
- Essential tool for running test automation101
- Record-Playback24
- Remote Control24
- Data crawling8
- Supports end to end testing7
- Easy set up6
- Functional testing6
- The Most flexible monitoring system4
- End to End Testing3
- Easy to integrate with build tools3
- Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm2
- Record and playback2
- Compatible with Python2
- Easy to scale2
- Integration Tests2
- Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework0
- Flaky tests8
- Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)4
- Update browser drivers2
related Selenium posts
When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.
For our digital QA organization to support a complex hybrid monolith/microservice architecture, our team took on the lofty goal of building out a commonized UI test automation framework. One of the primary requisites included a technical minimalist threshold such that an engineer or analyst with fundamental knowledge of JavaScript could automate their tests with greater ease. Just to list a few: - Nightwatchjs - Selenium - Cucumber - GitHub - Go.CD - Docker - ExpressJS - React - PostgreSQL
With this structure, we're able to combine the automation efforts of each team member into a centralized repository while also providing new relevant metrics to business owners.
- TDD Unit Testing5
- TDD Integration Testing2
- Software Quality2
- TDD Acceptance Testing2
- TDD Unit Testing1
- Unit Testing1
- The de facto standard for xUnit testing in PHP1
- Mocked services require more effort and understanding1
related PHPUnit posts
What is the best solution (PHPUnit or Behat) for test automation (unit and functional tests)?
- BDD Acceptance Testing1
- Easy Ubiquitous language integration reusing code1
related Behat posts
What is the best solution (PHPUnit or Behat) for test automation (unit and functional tests)?
- Readability10
- Full browser control9
- Cross browser support9
- Open source8
- Community6
- Flexible Driver5
- Great documentation3
- Agnostic2
- Small community2
- Not a framework by itself1
related CodeceptJS posts
Is it acceptable to compare CodeceptJS with Robot Framework? What are the pros and cons for them?
Cypress
- Open source29
- Great documentation22
- Simple usage20
- Fast18
- Cross Browser testing10
- Easy us with CI9
- Npm install cypress only5
- Good for beginner automation engineers2
- Cypress is weak at cross-browser testing21
- Switch tabs : Cypress can'nt support14
- No iFrame support12
- No page object support9
- No multiple domain support9
- No file upload support8
- No support for multiple tab control8
- No xPath support8
- No support for Safari7
- Cypress doesn't support native app7
- Re-run failed tests retries not supported yet7
- No support for multiple browser control7
- $20/user/thread for reports5
- Adobe4
- Using a non-standard automation protocol4
- Not freeware4
- No 'WD wire protocol' support3
related Cypress posts
When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.
We are in the process of adopting Next.js as our React framework and using Storybook to help build our React components in isolation. This new part of our frontend is written in TypeScript, and we use Emotion for CSS/styling. For delivering data, we use GraphQL and Apollo. Jest, Percy, and Cypress are used for testing.
- Simple Syntax20
- Simple usage8
- Huge community5
- Nice report3
related Cucumber posts
For our digital QA organization to support a complex hybrid monolith/microservice architecture, our team took on the lofty goal of building out a commonized UI test automation framework. One of the primary requisites included a technical minimalist threshold such that an engineer or analyst with fundamental knowledge of JavaScript could automate their tests with greater ease. Just to list a few: - Nightwatchjs - Selenium - Cucumber - GitHub - Go.CD - Docker - ExpressJS - React - PostgreSQL
With this structure, we're able to combine the automation efforts of each team member into a centralized repository while also providing new relevant metrics to business owners.
I am a QA heading to a new company where they all generally use Visual Studio Code, my experience is with IntelliJ IDEA and PyCharm. The language they use is JavaScript and so I will be writing my test framework in javaScript so the devs can more easily write tests without context switching.
My 2 questions: Does VS Code have Cucumber Plugins allowing me to write behave tests? And more importantly, does VS Code have the same refactoring tools that IntelliJ IDEA has? I love that I have easy access to a range of tools that allow me to refactor and simplify my code, making code writing really easy.
- Cross-browser testing8
- Open source4
- Easy setup/installation4
- Built in waits4
- UI End to End testing3
- Supports Devices without extra software/package2
- Both client and server side debug1
- No longer free9
- BDD Unit Testing1
- Better for code optimisation (BDD over TDD)1
- Mocked dependant services by default1
- Less support; devs are more used to PHP Unit1