Alternatives to Raygun logo

Alternatives to Raygun

Airbrake, New Relic, Sentry, Gatling, and Bugsnag are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Raygun.
129
158
+ 1
198

What is Raygun and what are its top alternatives?

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.
Raygun is a tool in the Performance Monitoring category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Raygun

  • Airbrake
    Airbrake

    Airbrake collects errors for your applications in all major languages and frameworks. We alert you to new errors and give you critical context, trends and details needed to find and fix errors fast. ...

  • New Relic
    New Relic

    The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too. ...

  • Sentry
    Sentry

    Sentry’s Application Monitoring platform helps developers see performance issues, fix errors faster, and optimize their code health. ...

  • Gatling
    Gatling

    Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support. ...

  • Bugsnag
    Bugsnag

    Bugsnag captures errors from your web, mobile and back-end applications, providing instant visibility into user impact. Diagnostic data and tools are included to help your team prioritize, debug and fix exceptions fast. ...

  • AppDynamics
    AppDynamics

    AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics. ...

  • Crashlytics
    Crashlytics

    Instead of just showing you the stack trace, Crashlytics performs deep analysis of each and every thread. We de-prioritize lines that don't matter while highlighting the interesting ones. This makes reading stack traces easier, faster, and far more useful! Crashlytics' intelligent grouping can take 50,000 crashes, distill them down to 20 unique issues, and then tell you which 3 are the most important to fix. ...

  • Stackify
    Stackify

    Stackify offers the only developers-friendly innovative cloud based solution that fully integrates application performance management (APM) with error and log. Allowing them to easily monitor, detect and resolve application issues faster ...

Raygun alternatives & related posts

Airbrake logo

Airbrake

258
283
128
Airbrake captures and groups errors in Ruby, iOS, Django, PHP & more.
258
283
+ 1
128
PROS OF AIRBRAKE
  • 28
    Reliable
  • 25
    Consolidates similar errors
  • 22
    Easy setup
  • 15
    Slack Integration
  • 10
    Github Integration
  • 7
    Email notifications
  • 6
    Includes a free plan
  • 5
    Android Application to view errors.
  • 4
    Search and filtering
  • 4
    Shows request parameters
  • 2
    Heroku integration
CONS OF AIRBRAKE
  • 0
    Rejects error report if non-latin characters exists

related Airbrake posts

New Relic logo

New Relic

19.5K
7.4K
1.9K
New Relic is the industry’s largest and most comprehensive cloud-based observability platform.
19.5K
7.4K
+ 1
1.9K
PROS OF NEW RELIC
  • 415
    Easy setup
  • 344
    Really powerful
  • 244
    Awesome visualization
  • 194
    Ease of use
  • 151
    Great ui
  • 107
    Free tier
  • 81
    Great tool for insights
  • 66
    Heroku Integration
  • 55
    Market leader
  • 49
    Peace of mind
  • 21
    Push notifications
  • 20
    Email notifications
  • 17
    Heroku Add-on
  • 16
    Error Detection and Alerting
  • 12
    Multiple language support
  • 11
    Server Resources Monitoring
  • 11
    SQL Analysis
  • 9
    Transaction Tracing
  • 8
    Apdex Scores
  • 8
    Azure Add-on
  • 7
    Analysis of CPU, Disk, Memory, and Network
  • 6
    Detailed reports
  • 6
    Performance of External Services
  • 6
    Error Analysis
  • 6
    Application Availability Monitoring and Alerting
  • 6
    Application Response Times
  • 5
    JVM Performance Analyzer (Java)
  • 5
    Most Time Consuming Transactions
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Top Database Operations
  • 4
    Browser Transaction Tracing
  • 3
    Application Map
  • 3
    Pagoda Box integration
  • 3
    Custom Dashboards
  • 3
    Weekly Performance Email
  • 2
    Easy visibility
  • 2
    App Speed Index
  • 2
    Easy to setup
  • 2
    Background Jobs Transaction Analysis
  • 1
    Incident Detection and Alerting
  • 1
    Worst Transactions by User Dissatisfaction
  • 1
    Metric Data Resolution
  • 1
    Metric Data Retention
  • 1
    Team Collaboration Tools
  • 1
    Rails integration
  • 1
    Super Expensive
  • 1
    Access to Performance Data API
  • 1
    Real User Monitoring Overview
  • 1
    Real User Monitoring Analysis and Breakdown
  • 1
    Free
  • 1
    Best of the best, what more can you ask for
  • 1
    Best monitoring on the market
  • 1
    Time Comparisons
  • 0
    Exceptions
  • 0
    Ddd
CONS OF NEW RELIC
  • 19
    Pricing model doesn't suit microservices
  • 10
    UI isn't great
  • 7
    Visualizations aren't very helpful
  • 7
    Expensive
  • 5
    Hard to understand why things in your app are breaking

related New Relic posts

Farzeem Diamond Jiwani
Software Engineer at IVP · | 5 upvotes · 797.2K views

Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.

Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS

Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure

Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server

Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.

Please advise on the above. Thanks!

See more
Sebastian Gębski

Regarding Continuous Integration - we've started with something very easy to set up - CircleCI , but with time we're adding more & more complex pipelines - we use Jenkins to configure & run those. It's much more effort, but at some point we had to pay for the flexibility we expected. Our source code version control is Git (which probably doesn't require a rationale these days) and we keep repos in GitHub - since the very beginning & we never considered moving out. Our primary monitoring these days is in New Relic (Ruby & SPA apps) and AppSignal (Elixir apps) - we're considering unifying it in New Relic , but this will require some improvements in Elixir app observability. For error reporting we use Sentry (a very popular choice in this class) & we collect our distributed logs using Logentries (to avoid semi-manual handling here).

See more
Sentry logo

Sentry

11.6K
7.3K
858
See performance issues, fix errors faster, and optimize code health.
11.6K
7.3K
+ 1
858
PROS OF SENTRY
  • 235
    Consolidates similar errors and makes resolution easy
  • 121
    Email Notifications
  • 108
    Open source
  • 84
    Slack integration
  • 71
    Github integration
  • 48
    Easy
  • 44
    User-friendly interface
  • 28
    The most important tool we use in production
  • 18
    Hipchat integration
  • 17
    Heroku Integration
  • 15
    Good documentation
  • 14
    Free tier
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 9
    Self-hosted
  • 7
    Realiable
  • 6
    Provides context, and great stack trace
  • 4
    Feedback form on error pages
  • 4
    Love it baby
  • 3
    Easy Integration
  • 3
    Gitlab integration
  • 3
    Filter by custom tags
  • 3
    Super user friendly
  • 3
    Captures local variables at each frame in backtraces
  • 1
    Performance measurements
CONS OF SENTRY
  • 12
    Confusing UI
  • 2
    Bundle size

related Sentry posts

Johnny Bell

For my portfolio websites and my personal OpenSource projects I had started exclusively using React and JavaScript so I needed a way to track any errors that we're happening for my users that I didn't uncover during my personal UAT.

I had narrowed it down to two tools LogRocket and Sentry (I also tried Bugsnag but it did not make the final two). Before I get into this I want to say that both of these tools are amazing and whichever you choose will suit your needs well.

I firstly decided to go with LogRocket the fact that they had a recorded screen capture of what the user was doing when the bug happened was amazing... I could go back and rewatch what the user did to replicate that error, this was fantastic. It was also very easy to setup and get going. They had options for React and Redux.js so you can track all your Redux.js actions. I had a fairly large Redux.js store, this was ended up being a issue, it killed the processing power on my machine, Chrome ended up using 2-4gb of ram, so I quickly disabled the Redux.js option.

After using LogRocket for a month or so I decided to switch to Sentry. I noticed that Sentry was openSorce and everyone was talking about Sentry so I thought I may as well give it a test drive. Setting it up was so easy, I had everything up and running within seconds. It also gives you the option to wrap an errorBoundry in React so get more specific errors. The simplicity of Sentry was a breath of fresh air, it allowed me find the bug that was shown to the user and fix that very simply. The UI for Sentry is beautiful and just really clean to look at, and their emails are also just perfect.

I have decided to stick with Sentry for the long run, I tested pretty much all the JS error loggers and I find Sentry the best.

See more
Gatling logo

Gatling

229
282
20
Open-source load testing for DevOps and CI/CD
229
282
+ 1
20
PROS OF GATLING
  • 5
    Loadrunner
  • 5
    Great detailed reports
  • 5
    Can run in cluster mode
  • 3
    Scala based
  • 2
    Load test as code
CONS OF GATLING
  • 2
    Steep Learning Curve
  • 1
    Hard to test non-supported protocols
  • 0
    Not distributed

related Gatling posts

Shared insights
on
LocustLocustGatlingGatlingJenkinsJenkins

I am looking for a performance testing tool that I can use for testing the documents accessed by many users simultaneously. I also want to integrate Jenkins with the performance automation tool. I am not able to decide which shall I choose Gatling or Locust. But for me, Jenkins integration is important. I am looking for suggestions for this scenario.

See more
Vrashab Jian
Shared insights
on
Flood IOFlood IOLocustLocustGatlingGatling

I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

See more
Bugsnag logo

Bugsnag

1.1K
578
267
Bugsnag provides production error monitoring and management for front-end, mobile and back-end applications
1.1K
578
+ 1
267
PROS OF BUGSNAG
  • 45
    Lots of 3rd party integrations
  • 42
    Really reliable
  • 37
    Includes a free plan
  • 25
    No usage or rate limits
  • 23
    Design
  • 21
    Slack integration
  • 21
    Responsive support
  • 19
    Free tier
  • 11
    Unlimited
  • 6
    No Rate
  • 5
    Email notifications
  • 3
    Great customer support
  • 3
    React Native
  • 3
    Integrates well with Laravel
  • 3
    Reliable, great UI and insights, used for all our apps
CONS OF BUGSNAG
  • 1
    Error grouping doesn't always work

related Bugsnag posts

Johnny Bell

For my portfolio websites and my personal OpenSource projects I had started exclusively using React and JavaScript so I needed a way to track any errors that we're happening for my users that I didn't uncover during my personal UAT.

I had narrowed it down to two tools LogRocket and Sentry (I also tried Bugsnag but it did not make the final two). Before I get into this I want to say that both of these tools are amazing and whichever you choose will suit your needs well.

I firstly decided to go with LogRocket the fact that they had a recorded screen capture of what the user was doing when the bug happened was amazing... I could go back and rewatch what the user did to replicate that error, this was fantastic. It was also very easy to setup and get going. They had options for React and Redux.js so you can track all your Redux.js actions. I had a fairly large Redux.js store, this was ended up being a issue, it killed the processing power on my machine, Chrome ended up using 2-4gb of ram, so I quickly disabled the Redux.js option.

After using LogRocket for a month or so I decided to switch to Sentry. I noticed that Sentry was openSorce and everyone was talking about Sentry so I thought I may as well give it a test drive. Setting it up was so easy, I had everything up and running within seconds. It also gives you the option to wrap an errorBoundry in React so get more specific errors. The simplicity of Sentry was a breath of fresh air, it allowed me find the bug that was shown to the user and fix that very simply. The UI for Sentry is beautiful and just really clean to look at, and their emails are also just perfect.

I have decided to stick with Sentry for the long run, I tested pretty much all the JS error loggers and I find Sentry the best.

See more
James Smith
Co-founder and CEO at James Smith · | 1 upvote · 210.9K views
Shared insights
on
LeakCanaryLeakCanaryBugsnagBugsnag
at

There’s a tool called LeakCanary that was built by the team at Square. It detects memory allocations and can spot when this scenario is occurring. LeakCanary has been billed as a memory leak detection library for #Android (and you’ll be happy to know there’s a Bugsnag integration for it as well!).

See more
AppDynamics logo

AppDynamics

267
537
59
Application management for the cloud generation
267
537
+ 1
59
PROS OF APPDYNAMICS
  • 18
    Deep code visibility
  • 11
    Powerful
  • 7
    Great visualization
  • 7
    Real-Time Visibility
  • 6
    Easy Setup
  • 5
    Comprehensive Coverage of Programming Languages
  • 3
    Deep DB Troubleshooting
  • 2
    Excellent Customer Support
CONS OF APPDYNAMICS
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 2
    Poor to non-existent integration with aws services

related AppDynamics posts

Farzeem Diamond Jiwani
Software Engineer at IVP · | 5 upvotes · 797.2K views

Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.

Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS

Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure

Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server

Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.

Please advise on the above. Thanks!

See more

Hi Folks,

I am trying to evaluate Site24x7 against AppDynamics, Dynatrace, and New Relic. Has anyone used Site24X7? If so, what are your opinions on the tool? I know that the license costs are very low compared to other tools in the market. Other than that, are there any major issues anyone has encountered using the tool itself?

See more
Crashlytics logo

Crashlytics

986
576
338
The world's most powerful, yet lightest weight crash reporting solution. Free for everybody.
986
576
+ 1
338
PROS OF CRASHLYTICS
  • 77
    Crash tracking
  • 56
    Mobile exception tracking
  • 53
    Free
  • 37
    Easy deployment
  • 25
    Ios
  • 15
    Great ui
  • 11
    Great reports
  • 10
    Android
  • 8
    Advanced Logging
  • 7
    Monitor Tester Lifecycle
  • 3
    Mac APP and IDE Plugins
  • 3
    Great User Experience
  • 3
    In Real-Time
  • 3
    iOS SDK
  • 3
    Security
  • 2
    Real-time
  • 2
    Crash Reporting
  • 2
    Beta distribution
  • 2
    Mobile Analytics
  • 2
    Best UI
  • 2
    Deep Workflow Integration
  • 2
    Android SDK
  • 2
    The UI is simple and it just works
  • 2
    Light
  • 2
    Seamless
  • 2
    Painless App Distribution
  • 1
    Easy iOS Integration
  • 1
    IOS QA Deploy and tracking
CONS OF CRASHLYTICS
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Crashlytics posts

    Stackify logo

    Stackify

    32
    61
    56
    Performance. Metrics. Errors. Logs. One platform
    32
    61
    + 1
    56
    PROS OF STACKIFY
    • 8
      Error tracking
    • 7
      Monitoring
    • 7
      Easy setup
    • 7
      Log management
    • 6
      Real-time application health
    • 6
      Alerting
    • 6
      Application performance
    • 5
      exception tracking
    • 2
      Application Performance management
    • 1
      Good for .NET and Windows Server
    • 1
      Great APM with integrated log & exception management
    CONS OF STACKIFY
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Stackify posts