StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data Tools
  5. Singer vs StreamSets

Singer vs StreamSets

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Singer
Singer
Stacks21
Followers34
Votes2
GitHub Stars573
Forks132
StreamSets
StreamSets
Stacks53
Followers133
Votes0

Singer vs StreamSets: What are the differences?

### Introduction
In the realm of data integration tools, Singer and StreamSets are widely used for data pipeline orchestration and management. Both platforms offer unique features and functionalities, but they also have key differences that set them apart.

### 1. **Architecture**: Singer follows a simple and lightweight architecture with modular design, focusing on data extraction and data transformation separately. In contrast, StreamSets utilizes a graphical design interface for creating data pipelines with an emphasis on real-time data processing.

### 2. **Community Support**: Singer has a robust open-source community with a growing number of taps and targets developed by various contributors. On the other hand, StreamSets also has an active community but primarily relies on its enterprise version for more advanced features and support.

### 3. **Flexibility**: Singer provides a flexible framework for data extraction and transformation through its tap and target architecture, allowing users to customize connectors based on specific requirements. StreamSets, on the other hand, offers a more structured approach with pre-built stages and connectors for streamlined pipeline development.

### 4. **Scalability**: StreamSets is known for its scalability, especially in handling large volumes of data streams and processing data in real-time efficiently. While Singer can also handle data processing at scale, it may require more manual configuration and optimization for high-volume data pipelines.

### 5. **Ease of Use**: StreamSets offers a user-friendly graphical interface with drag-and-drop functionalities, making it easy for users with limited technical expertise to create complex data pipelines. Singer, on the other hand, requires a higher level of technical proficiency due to its modular design and command-line interface.

### 6. **System Integration**: StreamSets provides seamless integration with various systems and technologies, including cloud platforms, databases, and big data frameworks, making it a popular choice for organizations with diverse data ecosystems. Singer, while capable of integrating with multiple systems, may require additional plugins or custom development for certain integrations.

In Summary, Singer and StreamSets offer distinct advantages in data integration, with Singer focusing on simplicity and customization while StreamSets excels in scalability and system integration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Singer
Singer
StreamSets
StreamSets

Singer powers data extraction and consolidation for all of your organization’s tools: advertising platforms, web analytics, payment processors, email service providers, marketing automation, databases, and more.

An end-to-end data integration platform to build, run, monitor and manage smart data pipelines that deliver continuous data for DataOps.

-
Only StreamSets provides a single design experience for all design patterns (batch, streaming, CDC, ETL, ELT, and ML pipelines) for 10x greater developer productivity; smart data pipelines that are resilient to change for 80% less breakages; and a single pane of glass for managing and monitoring all pipelines across hybrid and cloud architectures to eliminate blind spots and control gaps.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
573
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
132
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
21
Stacks
53
Followers
34
Followers
133
Votes
2
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Open source
  • 1
    Multiple inputs "taps"
Cons
  • 2
    No user community
  • 1
    Crashes
Integrations
GitLab
GitLab
FreshDesk
FreshDesk
Braintree
Braintree
HubSpot
HubSpot
Marketo
Marketo
Shippo
Shippo
Close.io
Close.io
Harvest
Harvest
Urban Airship
Urban Airship
FullStory
FullStory
HBase
HBase
Databricks
Databricks
Amazon Redshift
Amazon Redshift
MySQL
MySQL
gRPC
gRPC
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
Amazon Kinesis
Amazon Kinesis
Cassandra
Cassandra
Hadoop
Hadoop
Redis
Redis

What are some alternatives to Singer, StreamSets?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase