Airbrake vs Epsagon: What are the differences?
Developers describe Airbrake as "Airbrake captures and groups errors in Ruby, iOS, Django, PHP & more". Airbrake collects errors for your applications in all major languages and frameworks. We alert you to new errors and give you critical context, trends and details needed to find and fix errors fast. On the other hand, Epsagon is detailed as "Troubleshooting and Visualization for Serverless Applications". Troubleshooting and Visualization for Serverless Applications.
Airbrake and Epsagon belong to "Exception Monitoring" category of the tech stack.
Some of the features offered by Airbrake are:
- Dupe Detection- Developers will only receive an email once when an error occurs — rather than getting buried under an error email avalanche.
- Auto Resolve- An action on each application deployment — that way developers can focus on the problems that exist today, not the ones from last month.
- Github Aware- Airbrake is github-aware, and can link code in your Airbrake error stack traces to the corresponding locations on github.
On the other hand, Epsagon provides the following key features:
- serverless monitoring
- serverless troubleshooting
What is Airbrake?
What is Epsagon?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Epsagon?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Efficiently trace and detect errors in the stack without having to explicitly setup error tracking for each action.