Airbrake vs Errbit vs Rollbar

Overview

Airbrake

Stacks299

Followers298

Votes128

Rollbar

Stacks1.7K

Followers1.1K

Votes531

Errbit

Stacks38

Followers41

Votes44

GitHub Stars4.3K

Forks994

Airbrake vs Errbit vs Rollbar: What are the differences?

Introduction: This Markdown code outlines the key differences between Airbrake, Errbit, and Rollbar in a format suitable for a website.

Pricing Model: Airbrake offers multiple pricing tiers based on the number of notifications, users, and projects, allowing for scalability as the team grows. Errbit and Rollbar, on the other hand, offer a more straightforward pricing structure with fixed rates, making it easier to budget for.
Customization Options: Errbit provides extensive customization options, allowing users to tailor the error-tracking system to their specific needs and preferences. Rollbar offers some level of customization but may not be as flexible as Errbit in this regard. Airbrake falls in between, offering some customization features but not as extensive as Errbit.
Integration Capabilities: Rollbar specializes in seamless integrations with various platforms and services, making it a versatile option for teams with diverse tech stacks. Airbrake also offers a variety of integrations but may not cover as many platforms as Rollbar. Errbit, while capable of integrating with other tools, may require more manual setup for certain integrations.
Community Support: Errbit, being an open-source project, benefits from a strong community of developers contributing to its improvement and offering support through forums and documentation. Rollbar and Airbrake, as commercial products, provide dedicated customer support but may lack the depth of community-driven resources available for Errbit.
Performance Metrics: Rollbar stands out for its advanced performance monitoring capabilities, including real-time error tracking and detailed performance metrics that can help teams identify and address issues quickly. Airbrake and Errbit also offer performance monitoring features, but they may not be as robust or comprehensive as Rollbar's offerings.
Ease of Use: Airbrake is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive setup process, making it an easy-to-use option for teams looking to quickly implement error tracking. Rollbar and Errbit also strive for user-friendliness, but they may have a steeper learning curve or require more configuration to get started efficiently.

In Summary, the key differences between Airbrake, Errbit, and Rollbar lie in their pricing models, customization options, integration capabilities, community support, performance metrics, and ease of use.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Airbrake	Rollbar	Errbit
Airbrake collects errors for your applications in all major languages and frameworks. We alert you to new errors and give you critical context, trends and details needed to find and fix errors fast.	Rollbar is the leading continuous code improvement platform that proactively discovers, predicts, and remediates errors with real-time AI-assisted workflows. With Rollbar, developers continually improve their code and constantly innovate ra	Errbit is a tool for collecting and managing errors from other applications. It is Airbrake (formerly known as Hoptoad) API compliant, so if you are already using Airbrake, you can just point the airbrake gem to your Errbit server.
Dupe Detection- Developers will only receive an email once when an error occurs — rather than getting buried under an error email avalanche.;Auto Resolve- An action on each application deployment — that way developers can focus on the problems that exist today, not the ones from last month.;Github Aware- Airbrake is github-aware, and can link code in your Airbrake error stack traces to the corresponding locations on github.;RSS- Airbrake offers an RSS feed of error activity, so errors can be monitored using feed readers.;Lighthouse Integration- Airbrake integrates with the Lighthouse bug/ticket tracking application, for easy discussion of errors and integration with your existing workflow.;SSL Secure- Airbrake can be accessed over SSL-protected secure connections to keep your data completely private. The application itself is updated regularly with the latest security patches.;Multiple Projects- Easily track and navigate errors from multiple projects for up to 64 projects.;Fully supported platforms/languages- Ruby on Rails, iOS	Real-time visibility; Get real-time alerts on errors as they happen in an easy to read dashboard; No more noise or missed alarms with automation-grade grouping, powered by machine learning. Proactive triaging; Take proactive actions on new bugs and regressions with AI-assisted workflows; Get all the diagnostic and contextual data needed to triage errors. Root cause analysis; Get stack trace and all the data you need to debug, including request params, local var values, browsers, IPs, and more; Use Telemetry feature to retrace browser events leading up to an error. Strong security; Protect your data with encryption at rest. Broad platform support and Seamless integrations.	Your exceptions may contain sensitive data that you don't want sitting on someone else's server;Your application is behind a firewall;You'd like to brand your error catcher;You want to add customer features to your error catcher;You're crazy and love managing servers
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 4.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 994
Stacks 299	Stacks 1.7K	Stacks 38
Followers 298	Followers 1.1K	Followers 41
Votes 128	Votes 531	Votes 44
Pros & Cons
Pros 28 Reliable 25 Consolidates similar errors 22 Easy setup 15 Slack Integration 10 Github Integration Cons 0 Rejects error report if non-latin characters exists	Pros 74 Consolidates similar errors by impact 64 Centralize error management 63 Slack integration 58 Github integration 47 Usage based pricing	Pros 10 Airbrake compliant 9 Easy setup 7 Slack integration 7 Open source 5 Consolidates similar errors
Integrations
GitHub ExpressJS Chef Slack PHP JavaScript Django Zapier Heroku Python	Python Mailgun Jira Slack Java PHP Segment JavaScript GitHub Golang	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Airbrake, Rollbar, Errbit?

Sentry

Sentry’s Application Monitoring platform helps developers see performance issues, fix errors faster, and optimize their code health.

Bugsnag

Bugsnag captures errors from your web, mobile and back-end applications, providing instant visibility into user impact. Diagnostic data and tools are included to help your team prioritize, debug and fix exceptions fast.

Raygun

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.

Opbeat

Opbeat is application monitoring for developers, and gives you performance metrics, error logging, release tracking and workflow in one smart product.

Honeybadger

Honeybadger does more than report errors, it helps you work with your team to fix them. Errors can be assigned. You can comment via email. And a fine-grained permissions system means you control who has access to each specific project.

OverOps

OverOps maps the DNA of code as it’s executing in pre-prod and production to Identify all issues and anomalies, and deliver True Root Cause to the right person, without relying on logs.

TrackJS

Production error monitoring and reporting for web applications. TrackJS provides deep insights into real user errors. See the user, network, and application events that tell the story of an error so you can actually fix them.

App Enlight

App Enlight provides a helpful interface to let you and your team save time spent on debugging and reproducing exceptions and performance issues from a production environment.

elmah.io

Cloud logging for .NET web applications using ELMAH. Find bugs before you go live. Powerful search, API, integration with Slack, GitHub, Visual Studio and more

Epsagon

Epsagon enables teams to instantly visualize, understand and optimize their microservice architectures. With our unique lightweight auto-instrumentation, gaps in data and manual work associated with other APM solutions are eliminated, provi

Related Comparisons

Airbrake vs Errbit vs Rollbar: What are the differences?

Introduction: This Markdown code outlines the key differences between Airbrake, Errbit, and Rollbar in a format suitable for a website.

Pricing Model: Airbrake offers multiple pricing tiers based on the number of notifications, users, and projects, allowing for scalability as the team grows. Errbit and Rollbar, on the other hand, offer a more straightforward pricing structure with fixed rates, making it easier to budget for.
Customization Options: Errbit provides extensive customization options, allowing users to tailor the error-tracking system to their specific needs and preferences. Rollbar offers some level of customization but may not be as flexible as Errbit in this regard. Airbrake falls in between, offering some customization features but not as extensive as Errbit.
Integration Capabilities: Rollbar specializes in seamless integrations with various platforms and services, making it a versatile option for teams with diverse tech stacks. Airbrake also offers a variety of integrations but may not cover as many platforms as Rollbar. Errbit, while capable of integrating with other tools, may require more manual setup for certain integrations.
Community Support: Errbit, being an open-source project, benefits from a strong community of developers contributing to its improvement and offering support through forums and documentation. Rollbar and Airbrake, as commercial products, provide dedicated customer support but may lack the depth of community-driven resources available for Errbit.
Performance Metrics: Rollbar stands out for its advanced performance monitoring capabilities, including real-time error tracking and detailed performance metrics that can help teams identify and address issues quickly. Airbrake and Errbit also offer performance monitoring features, but they may not be as robust or comprehensive as Rollbar's offerings.
Ease of Use: Airbrake is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive setup process, making it an easy-to-use option for teams looking to quickly implement error tracking. Rollbar and Errbit also strive for user-friendliness, but they may have a steeper learning curve or require more configuration to get started efficiently.

Airbrake vs Errbit vs Rollbar

Overview