StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. Amazon S3 vs iCloud

Amazon S3 vs iCloud

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Stacks55.1K
Followers40.2K
Votes2.0K
iCloud
iCloud
Stacks92
Followers83
Votes0

Amazon S3 vs iCloud: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between Amazon S3 and iCloud

1. Pricing and Storage Limitations: Amazon S3 offers more flexible pricing options with pay-as-you-go and volume-based pricing structures. It also provides unlimited storage capacity and does not have specific limitations on the amount of data that can be stored. On the other hand, iCloud has limited storage capacity and provides different pricing tiers based on storage size, which may restrict the amount of data that can be stored.

2. Object Type and Access Control: Amazon S3 is capable of storing any type of object, including media files, documents, and databases. It offers fine-grained access control and allows users to manage access permissions for individual objects. In contrast, iCloud is primarily designed for storing personal files and media content, limiting the type of objects that can be stored. It also has more simplified access control options.

3. Data Accessibility and Platform Support: Amazon S3 is accessible from any platform and can be integrated into various applications and services. It has a richer set of APIs and software development kits (SDKs) that support different programming languages. On the other hand, iCloud is primarily tailored for Apple devices and has limited cross-platform compatibility. It offers seamless integration with iOS, macOS, and other Apple ecosystem products.

4. Scalability and Performance: Amazon S3 is highly scalable and can handle a massive amount of data and concurrent requests. It is designed for high-performance applications and supports parallel uploads and downloads, enabling faster data transfer speeds. Conversely, iCloud may experience limitations in scalability and performance, as it is primarily focused on individual user storage and synchronization across Apple devices.

5. Data Redundancy and Durability: Amazon S3 provides a high level of data redundancy and durability through its multiple data centers and replication mechanisms. It automatically stores multiple copies of each object to ensure data availability in the event of hardware failures or disasters. iCloud also offers data redundancy, but the level may be comparatively lower, primarily relying on device-to-device synchronization and backups.

6. Integration and Additional Services: Amazon S3 is tightly integrated with other Amazon Web Services (AWS) offerings, such as Amazon EC2 and AWS Lambda, allowing seamless data exchange and processing. It also offers several additional services like data analytics, machine learning, and serverless computing. In contrast, iCloud focuses more on personal content synchronization and does not provide an extensive range of additional services.

In summary, Amazon S3 and iCloud differ in terms of pricing and storage limitations, object type and access control, data accessibility and platform support, scalability and performance, data redundancy and durability, as well as integration and additional services.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon S3, iCloud

Gabriel
Gabriel

CEO at NaoLogic Inc

Dec 24, 2019

Decided

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

330k views330k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon S3
Amazon S3
iCloud
iCloud

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Sign in to iCloud to access your photos, videos, documents, notes, contacts, and more. Use your Apple ID or create a new account to start using Apple services.

Write, read, and delete objects containing from 1 byte to 5 terabytes of data each. The number of objects you can store is unlimited.;Each object is stored in a bucket and retrieved via a unique, developer-assigned key.;A bucket can be stored in one of several Regions. You can choose a Region to optimize for latency, minimize costs, or address regulatory requirements. Amazon S3 is currently available in the US Standard, US West (Oregon), US West (Northern California), EU (Ireland), Asia Pacific (Singapore), Asia Pacific (Tokyo), Asia Pacific (Sydney), South America (Sao Paulo), and GovCloud (US) Regions. The US Standard Region automatically routes requests to facilities in Northern Virginia or the Pacific Northwest using network maps.;Objects stored in a Region never leave the Region unless you transfer them out. For example, objects stored in the EU (Ireland) Region never leave the EU.;Authentication mechanisms are provided to ensure that data is kept secure from unauthorized access. Objects can be made private or public, and rights can be granted to specific users.;Options for secure data upload/download and encryption of data at rest are provided for additional data protection.;Uses standards-based REST and SOAP interfaces designed to work with any Internet-development toolkit.;Built to be flexible so that protocol or functional layers can easily be added. The default download protocol is HTTP. A BitTorrent protocol interface is provided to lower costs for high-scale distribution.;Provides functionality to simplify manageability of data through its lifetime. Includes options for segregating data by buckets, monitoring and controlling spend, and automatically archiving data to even lower cost storage options. These options can be easily administered from the Amazon S3 Management Console.;Reliability backed with the Amazon S3 Service Level Agreement.
-
Statistics
Stacks
55.1K
Stacks
92
Followers
40.2K
Followers
83
Votes
2.0K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 590
    Reliable
  • 492
    Scalable
  • 456
    Cheap
  • 329
    Simple & easy
  • 83
    Many sdks
Cons
  • 7
    Permissions take some time to get right
  • 6
    Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly
  • 6
    Requires a credit card
  • 3
    Complex to set up
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Amazon S3, iCloud?

Google Drive

Google Drive

Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer.

Dropbox

Dropbox

Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more.

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Box

Box

The Box API gives you access to the content management features you see in our web app and lets you extend them for use in your own app. It strives to be RESTful and is organized around the main resources you’re familiar with from the Box web interface.

Minio

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase