Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AppDynamics vs Jaeger: What are the differences?
Introduction
AppDynamics and Jaeger are two popular tools used for application performance monitoring and distributed tracing. While they both serve similar purposes, there are several key differences between the two.
Deployment and Architecture: AppDynamics is a commercial tool that requires a dedicated infrastructure setup for deployment. It consists of an agent installed on each application server, which collects performance data and sends it to a centralized controller. On the other hand, Jaeger is an open-source project that follows a distributed architecture. It uses a lightweight agent called a "Jaeger client" that is embedded within the application code, allowing for more flexibility in deployment models.
Cost: AppDynamics is a commercial product and comes with a licensing cost. The cost is usually based on factors like the number of applications, endpoints, and users. In contrast, Jaeger is an open-source project and is free to use. This difference in cost can be a determining factor for organizations with budget constraints.
Ease of Use: AppDynamics provides a user-friendly interface and offers a range of advanced features out-of-the-box. It provides detailed visualizations, analytics, and alerting capabilities, making it easier for users to monitor and troubleshoot application performance issues. Jaeger, despite its powerful tracing capabilities, has a steeper learning curve and requires more manual configuration and customization for setting up monitoring and analysis.
Integration and Ecosystem: AppDynamics integrates well with other tools and technologies commonly used in enterprise environments. It has built-in support for a wide range of frameworks, application servers, and databases. AppDynamics also provides extensive APIs for seamless integration with third-party tools and custom applications. Jaeger, being an open-source project, has a smaller ecosystem and limited integration options. However, it is built on open standards and can be extended or customized according to specific requirements.
Visibility and Scalability: AppDynamics offers deep visibility into application performance, including real-time metrics, transaction tracing, and code-level diagnostics. It provides detailed insights into application behavior, resource consumption, and end-user experience. AppDynamics also scales well for large-scale deployments, handling high traffic and complex distributed architectures effectively. Jaeger, on the other hand, focuses primarily on distributed tracing and provides detailed information about the flow of requests between different components of a distributed system. While it excels in tracing capabilities, it may not provide the same level of visibility and scalability as AppDynamics in terms of overall application performance monitoring.
In Summary, AppDynamics is a commercial tool with a centralized architecture, advanced features, and extensive integration options, while Jaeger is an open-source project with a distributed architecture, powerful tracing capabilities, and cost-effectiveness. The choice between the two depends on specific requirements, budget constraints, and the need for a comprehensive application performance monitoring solution versus a focused distributed tracing tool.
Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.
Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS
Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure
Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server
Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.
Please advise on the above. Thanks!
Hi Folks,
I am trying to evaluate Site24x7 against AppDynamics, Dynatrace, and New Relic. Has anyone used Site24X7? If so, what are your opinions on the tool? I know that the license costs are very low compared to other tools in the market. Other than that, are there any major issues anyone has encountered using the tool itself?
what are the most important things you are looking for the tools to do? each has their strong points... are you looking to monitor new tech like containers, k8s, and microservices?
Pros of AppDynamics
- Deep code visibility21
- Powerful13
- Real-Time Visibility8
- Great visualization7
- Easy Setup6
- Comprehensive Coverage of Programming Languages6
- Deep DB Troubleshooting4
- Excellent Customer Support3
Pros of Jaeger
- Open Source7
- Easy to install7
- Feature Rich UI6
- CNCF Project5
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of AppDynamics
- Expensive5
- Poor to non-existent integration with aws services2