Runscope vs Assertible: What are the differences?
Developers describe Runscope as "API Performance Monitoring". Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring. On the other hand, Assertible is detailed as "Automated QA tools to test and monitor your web services across deployments and environments". Reduce bugs in web applications by using Assertible to create an automated QA pipeline that helps you catch failures & ship code faster.
Runscope and Assertible are primarily classified as "API" and "Monitoring" tools respectively.
Some of the features offered by Runscope are:
- Runscope Radar: Automatically monitor your APIs from around the globe. Integrates with PagerDuty, New Relic Insights, Keen IO, HipChat, Slack and more. Test complete API workflows with powerful assertions and notifications.
- Runscope Metrics: API performance and usage reports.
- Runscope API Traffic Inspector: Log and view API calls from any language or framework to any API to solve integration problems.
On the other hand, Assertible provides the following key features:
- Integrate with your favorite tools
- Automate your QA like a pro
- Run the same tests on all environments
What is Assertible?
What is Runscope?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose Assertible?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Assertible?
What are the cons of using Runscope?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Used Runscope for monitoring API uptime and data validation in context of the Harald beacon platform.
We use Assertible to automatically monitor and test our APIs and web services after every deployment.