Overview

CircleCI

Stacks13.0K

Followers7.1K

Votes974

Jenkins

Stacks59.2K

Followers50.4K

Votes2.2K

GitHub Stars24.6K

Forks9.2K

AWS CodeBuild

Stacks378

Followers485

Votes43

AWS CodeBuild vs CircleCI vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Introduction:

AWS CodeBuild, CircleCI, and Jenkins are all continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) platforms that help automate the process of building, testing, and deploying software. While they share the same goal, there are key differences that set them apart.

1. Scalability and Cloud-native Approach: AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), meaning it leverages the scalability and reliability of AWS infrastructure. It can easily scale up or down based on the demands of the project. In contrast, CircleCI and Jenkins are self-hosted solutions that require manual configuration and management of the underlying infrastructure.

2. Build and Test Environments: AWS CodeBuild provides a variety of pre-configured build environments based on commonly known programming languages and frameworks. These environments are automatically managed and updated by AWS. CircleCI and Jenkins require users to set up their own build environments, which can be time-consuming and complex.

3. Integration with Other AWS Services: AWS CodeBuild integrates seamlessly with other AWS services, allowing developers to easily incorporate other AWS tools, such as AWS CodeCommit, AWS CodeDeploy, and AWS CodePipeline into their CI/CD workflows. CircleCI and Jenkins also offer integrations with external services, but they may require additional setup and configuration.

4. Pricing Model: AWS CodeBuild charges users based on the total build duration and the number of build minutes consumed. CircleCI offers a usage-based pricing model, where the cost is determined by the amount of parallelism and the number of containers used. Jenkins, on the other hand, is open source and free to use, but users are responsible for the cost of hosting and managing their own infrastructure.

5. Ease of Use: AWS CodeBuild provides a user-friendly web interface and CLI (Command Line Interface) that allows developers to easily create, configure, and manage build projects. CircleCI also offers a user-friendly web interface, while Jenkins requires more technical expertise to set up and configure. Jenkins relies heavily on configuration files and plugins for customization.

6. Community and Ecosystem: Jenkins has a large and active community, with a vast array of plugins and integrations available. It has been around for a long time and has a wealth of documentation and resources. CircleCI has a growing community and offers an extensive library of predefined and customizable orb (configurations). AWS CodeBuild, being an AWS service, benefits from the broader AWS ecosystem and integrates well with other AWS services.

In Summary, AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed, cloud-native solution with seamless integrations with other AWS services and a user-friendly interface. CircleCI offers flexibility in pricing and a growing community, while Jenkins provides extensive customization options and a large, established community.

🔥 Trending in Continuous Integration on StackShare

TeamCity Pipelines Continuous Integration

JetBrains' next gen CI/CD with self-optimizing pipelines

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

3

Advice on CircleCI, Jenkins, AWS CodeBuild

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Azure Pipelines

.NET

Jenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k

Comments

Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

CircleCI	Jenkins	AWS CodeBuild
Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.	In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.	AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers.
Language-Inclusive Support;Custom Environments;Flexible Resource Allocation;SSH Or Local Builds For Easy Debugging;Improved Caching;Unmatched Security;Parallelism;Insights	Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support	Fully Managed Build Service;Continuous Scaling;Enables Continuous Integration;Integrates seamlessly with AWS services;FAQs: https://aws.amazon.com/codebuild/faqs/
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 24.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 9.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 13.0K	Stacks 59.2K	Stacks 378
Followers 7.1K	Followers 50.4K	Followers 485
Votes 974	Votes 2.2K	Votes 43
Pros & Cons
Pros 226 Github integration 177 Easy setup 153 Fast builds 94 Competitively priced 74 Slack integration Cons 12 Unstable 6 Scammy pricing structure 0 Aggressive Github permissions	Pros 523 Hosted internally 469 Free open source 318 Great to build, deploy or launch anything async 243 Tons of integrations 211 Rich set of plugins with good documentation Cons 13 Workarounds needed for basic requirements 10 Groovy with cumbersome syntax 8 Plugins compatibility issues 7 Limited abilities with declarative pipelines 7 Lack of support	Pros 7 Pay per minute 5 Parameter Store integration for passing secrets 4 Integrated with AWS 3 Streaming logs to Amazon CloudWatch 3 Bit bucket integration Cons 2 Poor branch support
Integrations
dotCloud GitHub Xcode Azure Container Service Slack Heroku JavaScript Node.js Python Amazon EC2	No integrations available	AWS Elastic Beanstalk AWS CodeCommit Amazon S3 GitHub Bitbucket AWS CloudFormation GitHub Enterprise

What are some alternatives to CircleCI, Jenkins, AWS CodeBuild?

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Appveyor

AppVeyor aims to give powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment tools to every .NET developer without the hassle of setting up and maintaining their own build server.