AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket

Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit

135
129
+ 1
179
Bitbucket
Bitbucket

12K
8.9K
+ 1
2.8K
Add tool

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?

What is AWS CodeCommit? Fully-managed source control service that makes it easy for companies to host secure and highly scalable private Git repositories. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

What is Bitbucket? One place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private repositories. Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

AWS CodeCommit and Bitbucket can be categorized as "Code Collaboration & Version Control" tools.

Some of the features offered by AWS CodeCommit are:

  • Collaboration
  • Encryption
  • Access Control

On the other hand, Bitbucket provides the following key features:

  • Unlimited private repositories, charged per user
  • Best-in-class Jira integration
  • Built-in CI/CD

"Free private repos" is the top reason why over 39 developers like AWS CodeCommit, while over 896 developers mention "Free private repos" as the leading cause for choosing Bitbucket.

PayPal, Salesforce, and Starbucks are some of the popular companies that use Bitbucket, whereas AWS CodeCommit is used by iMedicare, Complete Business Online, and Sidecar Interactive. Bitbucket has a broader approval, being mentioned in 1735 company stacks & 1449 developers stacks; compared to AWS CodeCommit, which is listed in 24 company stacks and 17 developer stacks.

- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is AWS CodeCommit?

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

What is Bitbucket?

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose AWS CodeCommit?
Why do developers choose Bitbucket?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

Sign up to add, upvote and see more consMake informed product decisions

What companies use AWS CodeCommit?
What companies use Bitbucket?

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with AWS CodeCommit?
What tools integrate with Bitbucket?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to AWS CodeCommit and Bitbucket?
GitHub
GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
GitLab
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.
SVN (Subversion)
Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.
See all alternatives
Decisions about AWS CodeCommit and Bitbucket
Michael Kelly
Michael Kelly
Senior Software Engineer at StackShare · | 14 upvotes · 172.4K views
atACK FoundryACK Foundry
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitLab Pages
GitLab Pages
GitLab CI
GitLab CI
GitHub
GitHub
GitLab
GitLab
#OpenSourceCloud

I use GitLab when building side-projects and MVPs. The interface and interactions are close enough to those of GitHub to prevent cognitive switching costs between professional and personal projects hosted on different services.

GitLab also provides a suite of tools including issue/project management, CI/CD with GitLab CI, and validation/landing pages with GitLab Pages. With everything in one place, on an #OpenSourceCloud GitLab makes it easy for me to manage much larger projects on my own, than would be possible with other solutions or tools.

It's petty I know, but I can also read the GitLab code diffs far more easily than diffs on GitHub or Bitbucket...they just look better in my opinion.

See more
GitHub
GitHub
GitLab
GitLab
Bitbucket
Bitbucket

Bitbucket provides 5 private repositories for free that is I believe the best feature. GitLab seems very simmilar to GitHub. The only reason I've choosen GitHub is its popularity. It seems faster than GitLab, uglier than Bitbucket and featured as others. The best open source projects are hosted on GitHub. Many applications are integrated with GitHub like my favourite #GitKraken.

See more
Alex A
Alex A
Founder at PRIZ Guru · | 3 upvotes · 44.6K views
atPRIZ GuruPRIZ Guru
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Git
Git

An easy one this time - source control. Well, should we even think about anything else but Git these days? :) As for the repository, we use Bitbucket for only historical reasons. We used it since the time when the pricing model was more convenient than GitHub. And Bitbucket does the work for us perfectly, so no real reason to switch.

See more
Priit Kaasik
Priit Kaasik
Engineering Lead at Katana MRP · | 7 upvotes · 57.4K views
atKatana MRPKatana MRP
Sketch
Sketch
InVision
InVision
Slack
Slack
Microsoft Office 365
Microsoft Office 365
Jira
Jira
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Confluence
Confluence

How we ended up choosing Confluence as our internal web / wiki / documentation platform at Katana.

It happened because we chose Bitbucket over GitHub . We had Katana's first hackaton to assemble and test product engineering platform. It turned out that at that time you could have Bitbucket's private repositories and a team of five people for free - Done!

This decision led us to using Bitbucket pipelines for CI, Jira for Kanban, and finally, Confluence. We also use Microsoft Office 365 and started with using OneNote, but SharePoint is still a nightmare product to use to collaborate, so OneNote had to go.

Now, when thinking of the key value of Confluence to Katana then it is Product Requirements Management. We use Page Properties macros, integrations (with Slack , InVision, Sketch etc.) to manage Product Roadmap, flash out Epic and User Stories.

We ended up with using Confluence because it is the best fit for our current engineering ecosystem.

See more
GitLab
GitLab
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitHub
GitHub

I use GitHub because it's the coolest kid on the block for open source. Searching for repos you need/want is easy.

Especially with the apache foundation moving their workloads to them, unlimited private repos, and a package registry on the way, they are becoming the one stop shop for open source needs.

I'm curious to see how the GitHub Sponsors(patreon for developers) plays out, and what it'll do for open source. Hopefully, they design it in a way where it's not abused by big tech to "plant" developers that look like they're building open source when they're actually building proprietary tools.

Bitbucket GitLab

See more
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitLab
GitLab
GitHub
GitHub
#Githubmarketplace

A bit difference in GitHub and GitLab though both are Version Control repository management services which provides key component in the software development workflow. A decision of choosing GitHub over GitLab is major leap extension from code management, to deployment and monitoring alongside looking beyond the code base hosting provided best fitted tools for developer communities.

  • Authentication stages - With GitLab you can set and modify people’s permissions according to their role. In GitHub, you can decide if someone gets a read or write access to a repository.
  • Built-In Continuous Integrations - GitLab offers its very own CI for free. No need to use an external CI service. And if you are already used to an external CI, you can obviously integrate with Jenkins, etc whereas GitHub offers various 3rd party integrations – such as Travis CI, CircleCI or Codeship – for running and testing your code. However, there’s no built-in CI solution at the moment.
  • Import/Export Resources - GitLab offers detailed documentation on how to import your data from other vendors – such as GitHub, Bitbucket to GitLab. GitHub, on the other hand, does not offer such detailed documentation for the most common git repositories. However, GitHub offers to use GitHub Importer if you have your source code in Subversion, Mercurial, TFS and others.

Also when it comes to exporting data, GitLab seems to do a pretty solid job, offering you the ability to export your projects including the following data:

  • Wiki and project repositories
  • Project uploads
  • The configuration including webhooks and services
  • Issues with comments, merge requests with diffs and comments, labels, milestones, snippets, and other project entities.

GitHub, on the other hand, seems to be more restrictive when it comes to export features of existing GitHub repositories. * Integrations - #githubmarketplace gives you an essence to have multiple and competitive integrations whereas you will find less in the GitLab.

So go ahead with better understanding.

See more
Robert Zuber
Robert Zuber
CTO at CircleCI · | 5 upvotes · 6.1K views
atCircleCICircleCI
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitHub
GitHub
CircleCI
CircleCI

When you interact with CircleCI's web application, all of your requests are hitting the #API hosts. We handle the majority of our authentication via #OAuth from GitHub or Bitbucket. We provide programmatic access to everything exposed in the UI through an API token that you can generate once you have authenticated.

See more
Interest over time
Reviews of AWS CodeCommit and Bitbucket
Avatar of AnakinPt
Lead Engineer at Fineos
Review ofAWS CodeCommitAWS CodeCommit

The pull requests are only merged by FF what makes all the merges hard to manage. The IAM configuration is very awkward and the unavailability to add git hooks to prevent commits to be made into the server makes this tool not much usable for a software development company.

How developers use AWS CodeCommit and Bitbucket
Avatar of Wing Tang Wong
Wing Tang Wong uses BitbucketBitbucket

I was looking for an alternative to GitHub, where I could store my own private repositories. BitBucket filled that need and has performed extremely well.

I use Bitbucket's git repositories as a low cost config sync between servers.

Avatar of MOKA Analytics
MOKA Analytics uses BitbucketBitbucket

We use Bitbucket and Bitbucket Pipelines because of its tight integration with JIRA and code authorization features.

The primary drawback is that its extension ecosystem (e.g., PR review tools) is miles behind Github

Avatar of Volkan Özçelik
Volkan Özçelik uses AWS CodeCommitAWS CodeCommit

I use CodeCommit for projects that require a tighter integration with the AWS ecosystem.

Otherwise, my default source control system as a service of choice is: GitHub.

Avatar of Blair Gemmer
Blair Gemmer uses BitbucketBitbucket

Best GIT repository management software that allows free closed-source projects. Also works seamlessly with other Atlassian products.

Avatar of Aquarius Logics
Aquarius Logics uses BitbucketBitbucket

Great private repository capabilities that can be used for continuous integration in conjunction with Jira and Bamboo.

Avatar of papaver
papaver uses BitbucketBitbucket

had to use it as a couple of clients had repos on it. worst of the git services. i try to stay far far away.

How much does AWS CodeCommit cost?
How much does Bitbucket cost?
News about AWS CodeCommit
More news